I paid Distant Guns 65 $ so it's not 70.

It is overpriced but I already said that value of dollar have declined over
the years.

And I already agreed that Distant Guns was overpriced so I don't actually
understand why you again brought this up?

But, heh, I won an argument as it seems about remakes and release of old
game as any of you didn't list me a game that EA for example released again
for 40 $ and it was originally released in 2000. It't good to see that this
peasant from The Balkans can won arguments easily, still. :o)))

Just for a record! :o)) Or if you still want flame go ahead and list me 2 PC
games that were released in 2000. and then rereleased in 2006. with minor
changes, all for 40 $. There isn't any so you lost argument here. I won.
Tralalala.

BTW, that is just showing how some companies treat their customers.

If wargames are such a different entity and not similiar to other games then
why they are not priced at 150$? Budget releases are 5 UK pounds. Sold Out
for example.

On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:01:38 +0200, "Bloodstar"
microsoft.com> wrote:

because of your claim that...

- Mario claims that most new games are priced similar to DG
- Frank asks for examples
- We've exceeded Mario's attention span and he shuffles off into the
distance mumbling about....

Bloodstar wrote:

But that is only if you buy it now. If you buy it next month it will be
$90.00 for the same package.