<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>comp.softsys.stat.spss</title>
<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/</link>
<description>Posts for comp.softsys.stat.spss</description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:56 PDT</lastBuildDate>
  
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[What's wrong with this syntax?]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/what_s_wrong_with_this_syntax_69095918t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/what_s_wrong_with_this_syntax_69095918t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[THANKS IN ADVANCE!<br><br>DO IF sex=1 .<br>EXECUTE.<br><br>IF (age >=10 & age <11 & HeightPercentileforage>=5 &<br>HeightPercentileforage<10 & SystolicBP <97) HSBP=1.<br>EXECUTE .<br>IF (age >=10 & age <11 & HeightPercentileforage>=5 &<br>HeightPercentileforage<10 & SystolicBP >= 97 & SystolicBP <111)<br>HSBP=2.<br>EXECUTE .<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/what_s_wrong_with_this_syntax_69095918t.html"><b>7</b> Comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/what_s_wrong_with_this_syntax_69095918m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:56 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Violating the homogeneity of variance assumption]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/violating_the_homogeneity_of_variance_assumption_69065454t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/violating_the_homogeneity_of_variance_assumption_69065454t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Howdy all, <br><br>I examined scores (below, average, high) as my DV for three age<br>groups. I did a one-way ANOVA.  Results of the Test for Homogeneity of<br>Variances are:<br><br>Levene Statistic=24.258<br>df1 = 2<br>df2=4102<br>sig=.000<br><br>My ANOVA results are F(2,4102)=15.789, p=.000. Eta squared (SS between<br>groups/SS total)=.008.<br><br>I believe I may have violated the homogeneity of variance assumption<br>since its sig is less than .05, but I'm not sure I know what this<br>means. Help please? Thanks.<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/violating_the_homogeneity_of_variance_assumption_69065454t.html"><b>10</b> Comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/violating_the_homogeneity_of_variance_assumption_69065454m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:47:15 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Version 16 GUI problem]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/version_16_gui_problem_69059822t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/version_16_gui_problem_69059822t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[I can't remember if I've mentioned this issue in the group before, but<br>I couldn't find anything on it in the archives just now.  Just thought<br>I'd mention it in case anyone else is running into the same problem.<br><br>In version 16, I often find that the GUI is only accessible from the<br>data window.  If I try to access it from a syntax window, for example,<br>quite often, nothing happens.  I have to bring the data window to the<br>front, and access the GUI from there.  And before anyone asks, YES, I<br>have applied all of the relevant patches & hotfixes.  (Windoze version<br>of SPSS <a href="http://16.0.2" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">16.0.2</a>, running under XP Professional, SP2.)<br><br>--<br>Bruce Weaver<br>bweaver@lakeheadu.ca<br><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir</a><br>"When all else fails, RTFM."<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/version_16_gui_problem_69059822t.html"><b>2</b> Comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/version_16_gui_problem_69059822m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:59:39 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[compute percentiles from Z-scores]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/compute_percentiles_from_z_scores_69026286t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/compute_percentiles_from_z_scores_69026286t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Dear all,<br><br>Has anyone a macro/syntax or a formula I could use to calculate<br>percentiles & percentile ranks from Z-scores?<br><br>Thanks<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/compute_percentiles_from_z_scores_69026286t.html"><b>2</b> Comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/compute_percentiles_from_z_scores_69026286m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:44:42 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Re: Median across variables in new column]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68996846t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68996846t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:38:08 -0700 (PDT), graefe.andreas@<a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">gmail.com</a><br>wrote:<br><br>>Thanks, Rich.<br>><br>>So, one remaining question: it seems as if it's always necessary to<br>>FLIP the data in order to calcualate the median in SPSS.<br><br>Huh?  Read my response.  Getting the median in another<br>form, one line at a time,  is what the (untested) code was about...  <br><br>><br>>In my case, this means I'm not able to perform this since I have data<br>>sheets with 5 million rows...<br><br> ... and it works the same for 5 million rows as for 300,000 rows. <br><br><br><br>-- <br>Rich Ulrich <br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68996846t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68996846m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:30:52 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Re: Median across variables in new column]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68933870t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68933870t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[RichUlrich wrote:<br>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:46:41 -0700 (PDT), graefe.andreas@<a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">gmail.com</a><br>> wrote:<br>> <br>>> Hi,<br>>><br>>> I open a new post since I'm afraid the other one (http://<br>>> <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.stat.spss/browse_thread/thread" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.stat.spss/browse_thread/thread</a>/<br>>> 8726eacae27ea0a7#) is too old to get any answers.<br>>><br>>> I have a huge data file (about 300,000 rows) with ten variables, v1 to<br>>> v10. For these ten variables, I want to calculate the median in a new<br>>> column / variable.<br>>><br>>> Experimenting with copy and paste from other posts, I came to this:<br>> <br>> [snip, what follows]<br>> <br>> Perhaps I miss the question, but I think you want the<br>> median of ten variables that exist in one line.  For that,<br>> I do not imagine how VARSTOCASES could help;  it seems<br>> like that proper first step should be FLIP, to transpose<br>> the data. (Is that what that VARSTOCASES achieves?)<br><br>Yes.  If you have 10 variables per subject, VARSTOCASES will <br>change it to one variable per subject with 10 rows of data, and an <br>index variable with numbers 1-10.  Then you can use AGGREGATE <br>(with ID as the break variable) to compute the median for each <br>subject, which is what the OP wanted.<br><br><br>> However, I would not do that with 300,000 lines.  <br><br>I don't understand your point here, Rich.<br><br>-- <br>Bruce Weaver<br>bweaver@lakeheadu.ca<br><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir</a><br>"When all else fails, RTFM."<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68933870t.html"><b>1</b> Comment</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/median_across_variables_in_new_column_68933870m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:37:35 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Re: Can anyone help with optimal scaling in SPSS?]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_in_spss_68915438t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_in_spss_68915438t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Peter-D wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> can anybody give me some advice on optimal scaling in SPSS?<br>> Specifically, on the non-linear principal component analysis and the<br>> generalised canonical correlation analysis (overals).<br>> <br>> <br>> I find the optimal scaling procedures extremely useful. My problem<br>> ist<br>> that I really need to rotate the axis in order to understand and<br>> interpret the results. I know that a different kind of inteprretation<br>> is suggested, but I am not the visual type and I have problems<br>> interpretating unrotated dimensions. If I do employ subsequent<br>> varimax<br>> rotation, I get great results with a very clear structure.<br>> <br>> <br>> So far so good. The problem is, however, that the optimal scaling<br>> module in SPSS does not offer an intergrated rotation procedure so<br>> that right now I have to compute the varimax rotation by manually<br>> inserting the values in the matrix. The disadvantage is that I can<br>> never save the individual scores of my participants on the rotated<br>> dimensions. But that is what I want because I want to employ rotated<br>> scores for further validity analysis.<br>> <br>> <br>> Does anybody know a syntax in SPSS which makes it possible to<br>> directly<br>> rotate and then also to get the individual scores on the rotated<br>> dimensions? It is very easy to save the scores on the unrotated<br>> dimensions, but I need the rotated ones....<br>> <br>> <br>> I really would appreciate any advice, thank´s a lot!<br>> <br>> <br>> Peter<br><br>Peter, when posting the same message to multiple groups, please <br>cross-post (i.e., one post to the multiple groups) rather than <br>multi-posting (separate posts).<br><br>-- <br>Bruce Weaver<br>bweaver@lakeheadu.ca<br><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir</a><br>"When all else fails, RTFM."<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_in_spss_68915438t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_in_spss_68915438m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:51:07 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Crosstabs- multiple response sets Help]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/crosstabs_multiple_response_sets_help_68903918t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/crosstabs_multiple_response_sets_help_68903918t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Hi<br>I have this table (questions) as a part of a survey (university<br>project)<br><a href="http://img398.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capturetj5.jpg" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://img398.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capturetj5.jpg</a><br><br>It is used to know which methods the employers used to recruit their<br>workers and employees and what method is used most of each type of<br>employee (skilled, unskilled etc..)<br><br>I need help of how to design the SPSS (variables etc..) So in the end<br>I can have as an output:<br>1. The most 3 important methods for recruitment in general<br>2. The most 3 important methods for recruitment for each type of<br>workers<br>3. Frequencies for each method of recruitment<br><br>and Also what SPSS tests i need to run?<br>btw, the others in question 1 can have different answers obviously do<br>i have to create a variable in SPSS for each answer given? ( it may be<br>over 20)<br>Using SPSS 16.0 btw<br>Thanks for your help<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/crosstabs_multiple_response_sets_help_68903918t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/crosstabs_multiple_response_sets_help_68903918m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:08:11 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Can anyone help with OPTIMAL SCALING?]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_68861166t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_68861166t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br><br>can anybody give me some advice on optimal scaling in SPSS?<br>Specifically, on the non-linear principal component analysis and the<br>generalised canonical correlation analysis (overals).<br><br>I find the optimal scaling procedures extremely useful. My problem ist<br>that I really need to rotate the axis in order to understand and<br>interpret the results. I know that a different kind of inteprretation<br>is suggested, but I am not the visual type and I have problems<br>interpretating unrotated dimensions. If I do employ subsequent varimax<br>rotation, I get great results with a very clear structure.<br><br>So far so good. The problem is, however, that the optimal scaling<br>module in SPSS does not offer an intergrated rotation procedure so<br>that right now I have to compute the varimax rotation by manually<br>inserting the values in the matrix. The disadvantage is that I can<br>never save the individual scores of my participants on the rotated<br>dimensions. But that is what I want because I want to employ rotated<br>scores for further validity analysis.<br><br>Does anybody know a syntax in SPSS which makes it possible to directly<br>rotate and then also to get the individual scores on the rotated<br>dimensions? It is very easy to save the scores on the unrotated<br>dimensions, but I need the rotated ones....<br><br>I really would appreciate any advice, thank´s a lot!<br><br>Peter<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_68861166t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/can_anyone_help_with_optimal_scaling_68861166m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:08:35 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[How to calculate a 3 way interaction]]></title>
	<guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/how_to_calculate_a_3_way_interaction_68836078t.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/how_to_calculate_a_3_way_interaction_68836078t.html</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Hi All,<br>I could really use someone's help. I am new to SPSS and I need someone<br>to dumb it down for me. I want to calculate a three way interaction<br>between three categorical variables: A, B and C with a dependent<br>variable X. How do I do this on SPSS? I have very limited stats<br>knowledge and, like I said, I am very new to SPSS. So, please provide<br>me with a "SPSS for dummies" explanation. Thank you!!<br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/">comp.softsys.stat.spss</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/how_to_calculate_a_3_way_interaction_68836078t.html"><b>1</b> Comment</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/comp.softsys.stat.spss/how_to_calculate_a_3_way_interaction_68836078m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table><br>]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:09:51 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>