|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Iruata SouzaIruata Souza Date: Jan 12, 2008 05:46
I don't know why people cant come here complain about this, but the
site is down *again*.
It has been very unstable for some days now.
{plan9,cm}. bell-labs.com returns Object not Found.
thanks for the attention,
iru
|
| |
|
| | 8 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 12, 2008 06:58
Another thing is, where is http://cm.bell-labs.com/? I can't access
any page on that (/who/bwk has Brian Kernighan's page, which has
links to the source code he made with company, /cs, which gives you
access to the CSTR website, which includes old papers; /cm/cs/^(upe
awkbook cbook tpop), some books (the awkbook one is one I'd like to
find errata for).
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Iruata Souza wrote:
> I don't know why people cant come here complain about this, but the
> site is down *again*.
> It has been very unstable for some days now.
>
> {plan9,cm}. bell-labs.com returns Object not Found.
>
> thanks for the attention,
> iru
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ron minnichron minnich Date: Jan 12, 2008 09:40
On Jan 12, 2008 5:45 AM, Iruata Souza gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know why people cant come here complain about this, but the
> site is down *again*.
it's simple. Do you help support it? Do you contribute money to keep
it going? Do you send them hardware to help them in some way?
People have every right to complain when they pay for something and
don't get it.
They have no right to complain when something which is free is not
there when they want it.
It's a lot of work to maintain the site, the networks, and the
machines that go with it. No one is paid to do it -- it is done as a
service to us. Rather than complain when it is not there, we should
thank those who make it work when it is there.
So, yes, you might politely *ask* why the site is down, or if anyone
has any information. But to *complain* about it is to step over the
line.
thanks
ron
|
| |
| 6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Iruata SouzaIruata Souza Date: Jan 12, 2008 10:02
On 1/12/08, ron minnich gmail.com> wrote:
> So, yes, you might politely *ask* why the site is down, or if anyone
> has any information. But to *complain* about it is to step over the
> line.
>
People can complain about everything they want to
People are free to accept or not the complaining in the same manner
they are free to accept or not answering questions.
iru
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Iruata SouzaIruata Souza Date: Jan 12, 2008 10:03
On 1/12/08, ron minnich gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 5:45 AM, Iruata Souza gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't know why people cant come here complain about this, but the
>> site is down *again*.
>
> it's simple. Do you help support it? Do you contribute money to keep
> it going? Do you send them hardware to help them in some way?
>
> People have every right to complain when they pay for something and
> don't get it.
>
> They have no right to complain when something which is free is not
> there when they want it.
>
> It's a lot of work to maintain the site, the networks, and the
> machines that go with it. No one is paid to do it -- it is done as a
> service to us. Rather than complain when it is not there, we should
> thank those who make it work when it is there.
>
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 12, 2008 10:18
On Jan 12, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Iruata Souza wrote:
>
> If they paid me, I could help. And I thank who maintains it.
Who does so?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Gary WrightGary Wright Date: Jan 12, 2008 10:41
On Jan 12, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Iruata Souza wrote:
> Since if I'm one of the few noting that kind of stuff publicly, it
> seems that it's down only for that few people.
I see the site down frequently (once or twice a week maybe).
I'd consider a donation, but wasn't aware that was even a possibility.
I am curious though. There is clearly a recurring problem. Is it
hardware, software, or undiagnosed?
Gary Wright
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Russ CoxRuss Cox Date: Jan 12, 2008 11:06
> I just would like people to say if the site is down for them or not.
If you can't connect to plan9.bell-labs.com but you
can connect to, say, sources.cs.bell-labs.com
or even plain old www.bell-labs.com, then it's
exceedingly unlikely that the problem is on your end.
If you were really worried about that possibility,
you could log into a machine somewhere else in
the world (the Japan Plan 9 machines, for example)
and try connecting from there.
Whichever end has the connectivity problem, it doesn't
contribute anything to the quality of 9fans traffic
for a half dozen people to post "gee, it doesn't work
for me right now either". If you want to bring the problem to
someone's attention, this is one of the few situations in
which it makes sense to mail 9trouble@ plan9.bell-labs.com
instead of posting to 9fans. (Even if the machine
plan9.bell-labs.com is down, mail to 9trouble will still
arrive at Bell Labs via a different mail server.)
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Iruata SouzaIruata Souza Date: Jan 12, 2008 11:25
On 1/12/08, Russ Cox swtch.com> wrote:
>> I am curious though. There is clearly a recurring problem. Is it
>> hardware, software, or undiagnosed?
>
> Most often it is simply unnoticed. The machine that serves
> as the plan9.bell-labs.com web server does little else these
> days, so if (for whatever reason) it stops, it can take a while
> before anyone at Bell Labs notices. All the more reason
> to send mail to 9trouble (and not 9fans).
>
so you confirm the reason why I sent these mails: it seems to be unnoticed.
now the problem resumes to where to send the notice; if 9trouble is a
better place, I'll mail there instead.
iru
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|