Re: [9fans] sad commentary
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.os.plan9 only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         

Group: comp.os.plan9 · Group Profile
Author: sqweek
Date: Jul 22, 2008 07:21

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:35 PM, erik quanstrom quanstro.net> wrote:
>> Also, public 9grids. Though judging by gdiaz's experiences with
>> sirviente, there's a bit of work to be done in that area - I get the
>> impression things are fairly unstable once the machine gets under
>> memory pressure.
>> -sqweek
>
> i think this is an artifact of setting up heavily-used systems
> combining venti, fossil, auth and cpu server.
...
> sure crashing is antisocial. the alternative is to add very
> large amounts of code to the kernel.

Back when this was first posted I wanted to protest the point that a
large kernel modification is necessary, since I figured you can do a
"good enough" job with just an interface to tell the kernel not to
kill the important server processes.
Obviously I decided to let it lie, but I just discovered this can be
done without modifying the kernel at all when I happened across an
interesting line in termrc:

/rc/bin/termrc:dontkill
'^(ipconfig|factotum|mntgen|fossil|cs|dns|listen|reboot)$'

The default cpurc doesn't use dontkill, but I suspect it could be a
big help for all-in-one servers. Figured I'd point it out as it seems
easy to miss.
... plus everyone can use a good scare every now and then, and what
better way than to resurrect sad commentry?
-sqweek :D
1 Comment
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!