Re: [9fans] sad commentary
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.os.plan9 only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

comp.os.plan9 Profile…
 Up
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: erik quanstrom
Date: Jun 30, 2008 08:00

> is not available under Plan 9. (Or is it?) As there is no simple
> introduction to Plan 9 new users will just go the easy way and get
> Windows or Linux.

lack of an introduction is not the problem. not being unix
is the problem.
> For example the
> role of make as an equivalent for cc is not self-evident for a
> traditional normal OS-user.

come again?

- erik
20 Comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: Charles Forsyth
Date: Jun 30, 2008 08:33

>> For example the
>> role of make as an equivalent for cc is not self-evident for a
>> traditional normal OS-user.
>come again?

i thought it meant that he always types in cc commands on unix.
of course you could do that too with 8c/8l but normally on plan 9 i
create a mkfile except for the tiniest one-off things.
1 Comment
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: Steven D. Vormwald
Date: Jun 30, 2008 10:09

erik quanstrom wrote:
>> is not available under Plan 9. (Or is it?) As there is no simple
>> introduction to Plan 9 new users will just go the easy way and get
>> Windows or Linux.
>
> lack of an introduction is not the problem. not being unix
> is the problem.
>

Looking too much like UNIX while acting differently is part of the
problem. However, the bigger part is that the existing documentation
can be a bit daunting for someone who is new to Plan 9, and still has
only a vague notion of how the system works. Like the UNIX man pages,
the documentation is very detailed, and great for a reference. But many
new users need a bit of hand-holding, of the "Trust me, you want to run
this command. You'll learn why/how later, but for now, just RUN THIS
COMMAND." sort. At least until the 'new user' anxiety dies down a bit,
and the return of rational thought allows one to digest the more
extensive documentation.

Besides, isn't not being UNIX one of the prominent features of Plan 9?
Show full article (1.13Kb)
17 Comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: Pietro Gagliardi
Date: Jun 30, 2008 10:29

I do this:

fn build {
8c $1^.c && 8l -o $1 $1^.8 && rm $1^.8
}
acmef sieve.c # acmef opens acme with fixed-width font in one column
build sieve
sieve 2053

when I need to build a one-file program.

That's another good argument against Plan 9 that Unix users can make:
why do I have to run two programs to compile a C source code file when
Unix needed only one? I've grown used to it - build and mk help.

On Jun 30, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
Show full article (0.81Kb)
no comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: john
Date: Jun 30, 2008 10:37

> erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> is not available under Plan 9. (Or is it?) As there is no simple
>>> introduction to Plan 9 new users will just go the easy way and get
>>> Windows or Linux.
>>
>> lack of an introduction is not the problem. not being unix
>> is the problem.
>>
>
> Looking too much like UNIX while acting differently is part of the
> problem. However, the bigger part is that the existing documentation
> can be a bit daunting for someone who is new to Plan 9, and still has
> only a vague notion of how the system works. Like the UNIX man pages,
> the documentation is very detailed, and great for a reference. But many
> new users need a bit of hand-holding, of the "Trust me, you want to run
> this command. You'll learn why/how later, but for now, just RUN THIS
> COMMAND." sort. At least until the 'new user' anxiety dies down a bit,
> and the return of rational thought allows one to digest the more
> extensive documentation.
> ...
Show full article (1.81Kb)
3 Comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: John Stalker
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:18

> Looking too much like UNIX while acting differently is part of the
> problem. However, the bigger part is that the existing documentation
> can be a bit daunting for someone who is new to Plan 9, and still has
> only a vague notion of how the system works. Like the UNIX man pages,
> the documentation is very detailed, and great for a reference. But many
> new users need a bit of hand-holding, of the "Trust me, you want to run
> this command. You'll learn why/how later, but for now, just RUN THIS
> COMMAND." sort. At least until the 'new user' anxiety dies down a bit,
> and the return of rational thought allows one to digest the more
> extensive documentation.
Show full article (1.24Kb)
11 Comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: a
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:31

This is a very good point. I mostly learned Unix in a corporate
environment, but the same logic holds: somebody else had set
up and maintained the systems.

// I'm afraid there's not much we can do about this.

Other, obviously, than getting uni types to use it there. Plan 9
(like Inferno) has quite a bit to offer from pedagogical view.

// Trinity College Dublin

Pretty campus, warm sweatshirts. Convince your IT folks. ;-)

anthony
10 Comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: Francisco J Ballesteros
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:37

I have not even started such thing, but, if you go for it and want help,
count me in :)
> I've been thinking of writing a "Plan 9 for Dummies" style thing;
> Nemo's book is excellent but definitely aimed at someone most
> interested in writing code immediately. Basically stealing the format
> from all UNIX beginner's books ever written, it would have a chapters
> about logging on, basic rio usage, basic commands, the file system
> layout, acme and sam (to match the standard vi and emacs sections!),
> rc programming, and C under Plan 9. Imagine chapter one of Nemo's
> book except greatly expanded.
>
> Now, before I set quill to parchment (or fingers to keyboard as may
> be), has anyone else started something like this?
>
1 Comment
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: Tom Lieber
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:50

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros lsub.org> wrote:
> I have not even started such thing, but, if you go for it and want help,
> count me in :)

And I would read it! :)

--
Tom Lieber
http://AllTom.com/
no comments
Re: [9fans] sad commentary         


Author: erik quanstrom
Date: Jun 30, 2008 14:22

> Besides, isn't not being UNIX one of the prominent features of Plan 9?

tautology, no? to be plan 9 it must be different. if it were not, it would be unix.

- erik
no comments
1 2 3