Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.os.plan9 only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia         

Group: comp.os.plan9 · Group Profile
Author: Eris Discordia
Date: Sep 12, 2008 15:34

> s/completely/almost &/

Please don't try to educate me P. G. Microsoft got themselves into lots of
trouble to make NT almost POSIX compliant and to also create a fully POSIX
compliant subsystem (SFU/SUA/Interix). Everybody knows that. The sentence
you quoted was a hypothetical, you know, a _hypothetical_. Seeing how
"terrific" the hypothetical sounds one gets to shudder at the sound of
Anant Narayanan's actual "promotion" of Plan 9.

--On Friday, September 12, 2008 2:47 PM -0400 Pietro Gagliardi
mac.com> wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Eris Discordia wrote:
>
>> completely 'unencumbered' by POSIX."
>
> s/completely/almost &/
>
> Pietro
>
>
5 Comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!