|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Robert RaschkeRobert Raschke Date: Aug 29, 2008 01:26
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Eris Discordia
gmail.com> wrote:> It will eventually install but won't get past a specific step after the
> installed system is booted. I asked about the problem on 9fans. No
> solutions... yet.
>
> Here's the thread: http://9fans.net/archive/2008/01/547
With the iso I downloaded this week, I also get the issue that Eris points out.
Eris, if you want to give last years iso a try (20070329, it works
perfectly on MS Virtual Server R2 SP1), give me a shout and I'll put
it somewhere you can download it.
Robby
|
| |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Eris DiscordiaEris Discordia Date: Aug 29, 2008 06:57
> Eris, if you want to give last years iso a try (20070329, it works
> perfectly on MS Virtual Server R2 SP1), give me a shout and I'll put
> it somewhere you can download it.
Many thanks for the offer, but I just don't have access to the required
bandwidth. I had downloaded the first ISO image at a facility with a
broadband connection. That luxury is currently out of question for me.
Anyhow, I had gotten Plan 9 running on QEMU until I gave up and just purged
the whole thing.
Microsoft Virtual PC has so far been fine for running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE,
NetBSD v3.0.1, SuSE Linux v9 and v10, Slackware Linux v10.1, PC-DOS 5.0,
and MS-DOS 6.22. So I guess Plan 9 is expecting something out of the
ordinary, or simply being too pedantic.
--On Friday, August 29, 2008 9:21 AM +0100 Robert Raschke
googlemail.com> wrote:
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: David LeimbachDavid Leimbach Date: Aug 29, 2008 10:12
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Eris Discordia gmail.com>wrote:
> Eris, if you want to give last years iso a try (20070329, it works
>> perfectly on MS Virtual Server R2 SP1), give me a shout and I'll put
>> it somewhere you can download it.
>>
>
> Many thanks for the offer, but I just don't have access to the required
> bandwidth. I had downloaded the first ISO image at a facility with a
> broadband connection. That luxury is currently out of question for me.
> Anyhow, I had gotten Plan 9 running on QEMU until I gave up and just purged
> the whole thing.
>
> Microsoft Virtual PC has so far been fine for running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE,
> NetBSD v3.0.1, SuSE Linux v9 and v10, Slackware Linux v10.1, PC-DOS 5.0, and
> MS-DOS 6.22. So I guess Plan 9 is expecting something out of the ordinary,
> or simply being too pedantic.
That's one way to look at it, or you can just realize that
emulators/virtualization *aren't* the same as real hardware.
|
| Show full article (5.68Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
