|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Brantley CoileBrantley Coile Date: Jan 21, 2008 10:57
Better yet, why not copy mv somewhere local to Gcc and add it
as a no-op there? Do we really have to start seeing system
contamination from GCC in the released system? The slope feels
slippery here.
Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
>I'll add -f to Plan 9 mv as a no-op later.
|
| |
|
| | 69 Comments |
|
|
Author: Steve SimonSteve Simon Date: Jan 21, 2008 13:12
>>I'll add -f to Plan 9 mv as a no-op later.
> Better yet, why not copy mv somewhere local to Gcc and add it
There is a precident for adding scripts to massage APE command
line options before envoking the plan9 executable, for example
/rc/bin/ape/ls.
-Steve
|
| |
|
| | 68 Comments |
|
|
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 21, 2008 14:00
However, the problem is that I'm not sure how, or where, to put this
new mv so that ape/psh and gnu/gsh read this new one instead of the
old one. I successfully masked ln to cp and head to a modified
version of /n/sources/contrib/arisawa/misc/head, so everything else
works.
And now there really is no Makefile! configure says it is producing
one, but I see none. I'll try the other folders to see what I get.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Steve Simon wrote:
>>> I'll add -f to Plan 9 mv as a no-op later.
>> Better yet, why not copy mv somewhere local to Gcc and add it
>
> There is a precident for adding scripts to massage APE command
> line options before envoking the plan9 executable, for example
> /rc/bin/ape/ls.
>
> -Steve
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 21, 2008 14:48
New question: when was GCC for Plan 9 written? Third edition Plan 9?
Here's why: I only had to change one file to compile X11 for Plan 9,
which was developed on Brazil, which became Fourth Edition. I noticed
that some software I wanted to port uses X11R6, the version
available. My goal is to port Qt 4 to Plan 9, and then KDE 4. My idea
is that we can have a lot of Plan 9 software ready for end users in a
short amount of time.
The problem is, when I try to compile a hello, world C++ program with
gnu/gcc and gnu/g++, it tells me it can't find the iostream file, so
I'm thinking that you have to build from source. I tried iostream.h,
but to no avail.
Another thing I was trying to port was a library for reading ID3
tags, because the games/mp3tag that I got a while back was ID3v1, and
my tags are ID3v2.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Steve Simon wrote:
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
| 66 Comments |
|
|
Author: erik quanstromerik quanstrom Date: Jan 21, 2008 15:11
> The problem is, when I try to compile a hello, world C++ program with
> gnu/gcc and gnu/g++, it tells me it can't find the iostream file, so
> I'm thinking that you have to build from source. I tried iostream.h,
> but to no avail.
the c++ header files and are much different files.
- erik
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Fazlul ShahriarFazlul Shahriar Date: Jan 21, 2008 15:26
> Another thing I was trying to port was a library for reading ID3
> tags, because the games/mp3tag that I got a while back was ID3v1, and
> my tags are ID3v2.
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 21, 2008 15:32
(Almost) perfect. I'll modify it to print in the format required by
axel's mkmap/du2map.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Fazlul Shahriar wrote:
>> Another thing I was trying to port was a library for reading ID3
>> tags, because the games/mp3tag that I got a while back was ID3v1, and
>> my tags are ID3v2.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Pietro GagliardiPietro Gagliardi Date: Jan 21, 2008 16:40
After mkmap didn't generate a good enough map file and every
modification I tried to make ended up in disaster, I decided to just
generate my map files by hand. But I'd still like to run GCC to
compile Qt/KDE.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Russ CoxRuss Cox Date: Jan 22, 2008 04:16
> New question: when was GCC for Plan 9 written? Third edition Plan 9?
> Here's why: I only had to change one file to compile X11 for Plan 9,
> which was developed on Brazil, which became Fourth Edition. I noticed
> that some software I wanted to port uses X11R6, the version
> available. My goal is to port Qt 4 to Plan 9, and then KDE 4. My idea
> is that we can have a lot of Plan 9 software ready for end users in a
> short amount of time.
why use plan 9 at all? why not just install linux or freebsd?
russ
|
| |
| 9 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Harri HaatajaHarri Haataja Date: Jan 22, 2008 04:40
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:15:29AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
>> New question: when was GCC for Plan 9 written? Third edition Plan 9?
>> Here's why: I only had to change one file to compile X11 for Plan 9,
>> which was developed on Brazil, which became Fourth Edition. I noticed
>> that some software I wanted to port uses X11R6, the version
>> available. My goal is to port Qt 4 to Plan 9, and then KDE 4. My idea
>> is that we can have a lot of Plan 9 software ready for end users in a
>> short amount of time.
>
> why use plan 9 at all? why not just install linux or freebsd?
So rio and the compiler suite are the only good things in plan9?
--
To know what you prefer, instead of humbly saying Amen
to what the world tells you you ought to prefer,
is to have kept your soul alive.
-- Robert Louis Stevenson
|
| |
| 51 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
