Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.os.plan9 only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

comp.os.plan9 Profile…
 Up
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: lucio
Date: Sep 3, 2008 22:47

> if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too?

I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If
I'm right, there's no way that we'd get any momentum to turn this
around.

But your earlier comment is extremely valid, too few people are
working on drivers. Without wishing to fan Discordia's flames, it is
true that the 9fans community does not seem focused on solving
problems, but rather on the academic value of the ease in which
problems could be solved if one followed the 9 True Ways :-)

That said, how do we mobilise the community to focus on useful
drivers? I suppose we start with Ron's wish list, then we explore
Russ' partially complete postings (i386 emulation, Centrino drivers,
I'm sure I've forgotten many more) and thirdly we post a list of
willing contributors, possibly split into code writers and advisors.

Any takers?

++L
13 Comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: hiro
Date: Sep 3, 2008 23:13

Good luck.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:47 AM, wrote:
>> if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too?
>
> I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If
> I'm...
Show full article (1.00Kb)
no comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: Tim Wiess
Date: Sep 4, 2008 07:55

> That said, how do we mobilise the community to focus on useful
> drivers? I suppose we start with Ron's wish list, then we explore
> Russ' partially complete postings (i386 emulation, Centrino drivers,
> I'm sure I've forgotten many more) and thirdly we post a list of
> willing contributors, possibly split into code writers and advisors.

Are you serious?
I have a crazy idea: how about you actually write one?
1 Comment
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: Michaelian Ennis
Date: Sep 4, 2008 07:56

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:47 AM, wrote:
>> if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too?
>
> I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If
> I'm right, there's no way that we'd get any momentum to turn this
> around.

Sometimes the binary bits are loaded into the cards, maybe most often,
and therefore can be done in plan9 as well. Depending on the vendor
you may need permission from them to distribute the binary part.
> problems, but rather on the academic value of the ease in which
> problems could be solved if one followed the 9 True Ways :-)

Or maybe they have already written the drivers they need, contributed
them to the community, and are busy developing solutions based on
Plan9.
> That said, how do we mobilise the community to focus on useful
> drivers? I suppose we start with Ron's wish list, then we explore

I suspect that some of these drivers are missing still because the
hardware is not available to the developers who can write them.
Show full article (1.48Kb)
2 Comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: erik quanstrom
Date: Sep 4, 2008 08:18

> Sometimes the binary bits are loaded into the cards, maybe most often,
> and therefore can be done in plan9 as well. Depending on the vendor
> you may need permission from them to distribute the binary part.

cf. etherm10g.c. the myricom driver loads a metric ton of firmware into
the card.
> I suspect that some of these drivers are missing still because the
> hardware is not available to the developers who can write them.
>
[...]
>
> I think the one of the BSD projects, OpenBSD perhaps, used to accept
> hardware donations to this end. If we had a wayto get the hardware
> and the technical documentation in the same place as the developers we
> could get more hardware supported.
Show full article (1.51Kb)
no comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: dave.l
Date: Sep 4, 2008 16:07

This gets punted around every few months and nothing happens.

I've done some basic information-gathering but got no further for the
usual reasons,
so, in an effort to stimulate some inertia,
here's a small suggestion ...

Is there anyone out there who's gonna be in Volos and wants to
participate in a driver-writing BOF?

DaveL

On 4 Sep 2008, at 06:47, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>> if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too?
>
> I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If
> I'm right, there's no way that we'd get any momentum to turn this...
Show full article (1.31Kb)
6 Comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: ron minnich
Date: Sep 4, 2008 16:22

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:03 PM, mac.com> wrote:
> Is there anyone out there who's gonna be in Volos and wants to participate
> in a driver-writing BOF?
>

I'm not gonna make it, but it's an interesting idea.

What would be more useful, possibly, is a tutorial on how to write a
driver, with a few case studies.

ron
no comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: Uriel
Date: Sep 4, 2008 17:44

Sounds like a really cool idea, maybe somebody with more experience in
the subject wants to give a short introduction, and then people can
start to work on their favorite wanted driver (alone or in groups)
while the 'expert'(s) in charge of the session can answer questions
and help whoever gets stuck.

Anyone from the Program Committee wants to comment on this? Richard?

Peace

uriel

P.S.: Maybe to make things easier, it would be helpful to setup a
public plan9 server people can both drawterm/cpu to and boot from
their custom kernels for testing purposes, that way even not-fully
functional laptops could be used for development.

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:03 AM, mac.com> wrote:
> This gets punted around every few months and nothing happens.
>
> I've done some basic information-gathering but got no further for the usual...
Show full article (2.06Kb)
2 Comments
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: Uriel
Date: Sep 4, 2008 17:46

Maybe similar sessions for 'file server writing' or 'limbo
programming' might be nice for those not familiar with those subjects
(and thanks to 9vx and hosted the required setups would allow people
with non-plan9 laptops to participate).

Peace

uriel

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Uriel gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a really cool idea, maybe somebody with more experience in
> the subject wants to give a short introduction, and then people...
Show full article (2.45Kb)
1 Comment
Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post         


Author: ron minnich
Date: Sep 4, 2008 20:26

Those of us who can't make it could volunteer to be on irc during the
sessions, modulo timezone issues (that's what coffee is for).

ron
no comments
1 2