|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Hongzheng WangHongzheng Wang Date: Feb 18, 2008 04:56
Hi all,
Today, I try to install Plan9 on a Thinkpad T43 laptop.
Unforturnately, this attemp failed at last; there are some difficult,
at least for me, problems I cannot solve. So I am composing this post
to seek help.
The cd image I used is Feb 16 built version, downloaded from Plan9's
official website. It looks different from a previous version I used
to install Plan9 on an old PC. For example, after booting machine
with the cd, there are three options (install, livecd, and debug
livecd) instead.
The first problem I encountered is that DMA could not be enabled
during installation, although I have explicitly enable it when I am
asked. As a result, the copydisc task is executed so slow.
Furthermore, it claims that some files cannot be copied since they
don't exist. I try reinstall the system, but it seems that the
installation procedure prefer to continuing previous installation.
That is, it didn't try to recopy all files from cd and the missing
warnings are still there. At last, I ignored them.
|
| Show full article (2.38Kb) |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Alexander SychevAlexander Sychev Date: Feb 19, 2008 00:56
Hello!
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:14 +0300, Hongzheng Wang gmail.com>
wrote:
> For boot method, since I have both Linux and XP on my laptop already,
> I choose grub as multiple boot manager. That is, I select `plan9' as
> boot method when I am asked and don't install boot instructions into
> MBR. And configure grub to use `chainloader +1' to boot Plan9.
>
AFAIK, Plan9 needs a first free partition for installation. I use Plan9 on
ThinkPad T40 installed in the first partition and boot it with LILO via
'chain' rule.
--
Best regards,
santucco
|
| |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Hongzheng WangHongzheng Wang Date: Feb 19, 2008 05:20
Hi,
But even for the same install cd and partition scheme, the
installation is success for the first time ( execpt that some files
are missing when system is in use) and could not be booted at all for
the second time. This is really strange :(
|
| Show full article (0.93Kb) |
| 9 Comments |
|
  |
Author: johnjohn Date: Feb 19, 2008 09:11
> Hi,
>
> But even for the same install cd and partition scheme, the
> installation is success for the first time ( execpt that some files
> are missing when system is in use) and could not be booted at all for
> the second time. This is really strange :(
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2008 4:52 PM, Alexander Sychev gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:14 +0300, Hongzheng Wang gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> For boot method, since I have both Linux and XP on my laptop already,
>>> I choose grub as multiple boot manager. That is, I select `plan9' as
>>> boot method when I am asked and don't install boot instructions into
>>> MBR. And configure grub to use `chainloader +1' to boot Plan9.
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK, Plan9 needs a first free partition for installation. I use Plan9 on ...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Hongzheng WangHongzheng Wang Date: Feb 20, 2008 07:10
Hi John,
Many thanks. Your tip, zeroing the partition mannually first, may
answer the strange thing I encountered during installation. And, I
also prefer to native running Plan9. But an installation without
workable ethernet is quite unacceptable. So I might try the method
Eric recommended first. Alternatively, I will try to config the
previously installed Plan9 to be a CPU server.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:10 AM, csplan9.rit.edu> wrote:
>
> First off, Plan 9 does not need to be on the first free partition. I
> have it installed on the second partition on my laptop and it...
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Kernel PanicKernel Panic Date: Feb 20, 2008 07:16
Hongzheng Wang wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>Many thanks. Your tip, zeroing the partition mannually first, may
>answer the strange thing I encountered during installation. And, I
>also prefer to native running Plan9. But an installation without
>workable ethernet is quite unacceptable. So I might try the method
>Eric recommended first. Alternatively, I will try to config the
>previously installed Plan9 to be a CPU server.
>
>
>
is this nic integrated into the mainboard or can it be replaced (some sort
of mini pci slot)? maybe a pcmcia network card will do?
cinap
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Federico G. BenaventoFederico G. Benavento Date: Feb 20, 2008 07:31
I got a tullip clone for less than US$ 5
On Feb 20, 2008 12:26 PM, Hongzheng Wang gmail.com> wrote:
> Using another new network card shoule be ok. But extra cost is needed :P
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Kernel Panic
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Hongzheng WangHongzheng Wang Date: Feb 20, 2008 07:43
Another reason for configuring Plan9, which is installed on another
PC, as a CPU server, rather than struggling with T43, is that I still
prefer to Linux as my daily work platform. Plan9 is, on the other
hand, yet a research and experiment testbed for me.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Hongzheng Wang gmail.com> wrote:
> Using another new network card shoule be ok. But extra cost is needed :P
--
HZ
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Kernel PanicKernel Panic Date: Feb 20, 2008 07:55
Hongzheng Wang wrote:
>Using another new network card shoule be ok. But extra cost is needed :P
>
>
sorry... this is just the simplest obvious thing someone can do... the
other option
would be writing/porting a driver and i guess thats a lot harder.
but maybe here is hope... ron mentiond on irc that he will try porting
ndis-wrapper
to plan9 to get more wlan-hardware supported.
but i would not wait for it... just find a temoprary solution and keep
on... if
here is a better solution in the future, you can switch to it and sell
your replacement
card to ebay or something :-)
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|