On Aug 25, 6:38 pm, rusi_pathan <tabrez...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 25, 4:47 pm, Damian <dam...@rouson.net> wrote: On Aug 25, 1:35 pm, rusi_pathan <tabrez...@gmail.com> wrote: F2003 complier, how far from us? Cray and IBM Fortran compilers are almost complete w.r.t to the 2003 standard but other vendors like Intel, Sun etc. are certainly behind. A ...

rusi_pathan wrote: On Aug 25, 4:47 pm, Damian <dam...@rouson.net> wrote: On Aug 25, 1:35 pm, rusi_pathan <tabrez...@gmail.com> wrote: F2003 complier, how far from us? Cray and IBM Fortran compilers are almost complete w.r.t to the 2003 standard but other vendors like Intel, Sun etc. are certainly behind. A good read would be With regards to the ...

On Aug 25, 4:47 pm, Damian <dam...@rouson.net> wrote: On Aug 25, 1:35 pm, rusi_pathan <tabrez...@gmail.com> wrote: F2003 complier, how far from us? Cray and IBM Fortran compilers are almost complete w.r.t to the 2003 standard but other vendors like Intel, Sun etc. are certainly behind. A good read would be With regards to the features in the OOP chapter of ...

...+0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig posted: On 2008-07-22, Simulate <li.simula@gmail.com> wrote: F2003, can be used after 1 years? Probably not complete. gfortran is coming along nicely...volunteers are always welcome, of course! :-) If they roll back on PDT's, we'll have F2003 before 2010. and F2008, can be used after 5 years? More probably than F 2003 in...

On 2008-07-22, Simulate <li.simula@gmail.com> wrote: F2003, can be used after 1 years? Probably not complete. gfortran is coming along nicely with F 2003 features, but most probably wont't be a complete F 2003 implementation within one year (volunteers are always welcome, of course! :-) and F2008, can be used after 5 years? More probably than F 2003 in one year. You might ...

F2003, can be used after 1 years? and F2008, can be used after 5 years?

...When you have a linked list of ALLOCATABLEs that are local variables, does a single DEALLOCATE() on the first member deallocate the entire list, or must you set up a loop and deallocate each member individually? I'm pretty sure that the loop structure is required with straight f90 and f95, but I'm not sure about the effect of the allocatable TR, f2003, and f2008. $.02 -Ron Shepard

On 4月16日, 下午11时21分, lleshu...@gmail.com wrote: It can be see it in this year? Yes,the period of implimentation of f2003 standard seems to long! Three years more from it releases....

On 4月16日, 下午11时21分, lleshu...@gmail.com wrote: It can be see it in this year? In my opinion, Intel compiler is a better one in windows platform. However,I don't think it can release a full F2003 standard implemented complier at the end of the year.

FX wrote: the extension of f2003 is "f03" (see gfortran manual) so you may as well refer it by the same name. The idea of using file name extensions to indicate the language version is not widely accepted. I personally recommend against it. gfortran does not use file name extensions to recognize language version. They're used to recognized source form (fixed or free...