Re: Xah on Lisp
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.lang.functional only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

comp.lang.functional Profile…
 Up
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: xahlee
Date: Aug 21, 2008 16:12

On Aug 21, 1:44 pm, Kenny gmail.com> wrote:
> Don Geddis wrote:
>> Kenny gmail.com> wrote on Thu, 21 Aug 2008:
>
>>>xah...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>Don Geddis wrote:
>
>>>>>Not the power of a "language". The power of a language's _syntax_.
>>>>>Recall, _you_ are the one making the claim, that the irregularities
>>>>>"reduce [the] syntax's power".
>
>>>>In lisp, the comment is done by the char “;” running to end of line.
>>>>Note that this does not allow nested comment. So for example, if you
>>>>have multi-line code, and you want to comment out them all, you have
>>>>to prepend each line by a semicolon.
>
>>>I use a feature like #+nicetrybozo or #+chya for multi-liners.
>>>For print statements that are getting distracting but which may prove useful
>>>in the future I use #+shhhh ...
Show full article (3.88Kb)
10 Comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Kenny
Date: Aug 21, 2008 17:24

xahlee@gmail.com wrote:
> So, if i go all out in the effort to educate, i.e. refrain from
> showing any attitude, be the most patient, i think i'll be able to
> convince these morons. Should i? but i don't want to.

Life is short. Move on. Many are called, few are chosen.

Exchanges of more than a certain length are probably futile and
certainly become less and less fun. We need one fo your formulas: fun
times chance of persuading times prospect of producing world peace over
frustration.
Show full article (1.68Kb)
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Tim X
Date: Aug 21, 2008 20:52

"xahlee@gmail.com" gmail.com> writes:
> On Aug 21, 1:44 pm, Kenny gmail.com> wrote:
>> Don Geddis wrote:
>>> Kenny gmail.com> wrote on Thu, 21 Aug 2008:
>>
>>>>xah...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>>Don Geddis wrote:
>>
...
Show full article (14.10Kb)
2 Comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Kenny
Date: Aug 21, 2008 23:26

Tim X wrote:
> "xahlee@gmail.com" gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>On Aug 21, 1:44 pm, Kenny gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Don Geddis wrote:
>>>
>>>>Kenny gmail.com> wrote on Thu, 21 Aug 2008:
>>>
>>>>>xah...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>Don Geddis wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Not the power of a "language". The power of a language's _syntax_.
>>>>>>>Recall, _you_ are the one making the claim, that the irregularities
>>>>>>>"reduce [the] syntax's power".
>>>
>>>>>>In lisp, the comment is done by the char “;” running to end of line.
>>>>>>Note that this does not allow nested comment. So for example, if you ...
Show full article (3.13Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: namekuseijin
Date: Aug 21, 2008 23:45

Well, gotta say I'm kinda new to this ng and Lisp in general, but I've
already got enough of this meaningless arrogant troll.

hey, I know you don't like the sound, so check it out: *plonk*

It was fun for a while, Mr. Celebrity.
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Tim X
Date: Aug 22, 2008 00:51

Kenny gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> However, this takes the biscuit. You see, the only two people who were
>> actually taking your claims at all seriously are Don and Rainer. Kenny
>> on the other hand is just stirring the pot and playing with you.
>
>
> You must be honored. Only once a year am I so astonished by the copiousness
> of someone's copiousness that I cut and paste it into software capable of
> word count: the above error is followed by 2027 words? That is some
> biscuit.
>

Thanks, though I thought it was longer than that
> As for the error, you mistake my persistent good humor in all directions as
> directed at Xah, because you are so desperately insecure in your conviction
> that your subconscious has dragged me onto your side. And written 2027 more
> words.
Show full article (2.26Kb)
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Kenny
Date: Aug 22, 2008 04:09

Tim X wrote:
> Kenny gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>>However, this takes the biscuit. You see, the only two people who were
>>>actually taking your claims at all seriously are Don and Rainer. Kenny
>>>on the other hand is just stirring the pot and playing with you.
>>
>>
>>You must be honored. Only once a year am I so astonished by the copiousness
>>of someone's copiousness that I cut and paste it into software capable of
>>word count: the above error is followed by 2027 words? That is some
>>biscuit.
>>
>
>
> Thanks, though I thought it was longer than that
>
>
>>As for the error, you mistake my persistent good humor in all directions as ...
Show full article (1.67Kb)
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: xahlee
Date: Aug 22, 2008 05:42

2008-08-22

Tim X wrote:
> Oh Xah, it has just been so entertaining!

Thanks. LOL. I enjoy being red.
> However, this takes the biscuit. You see, the only two people who were
> actually taking your claims at all seriously are Don and Rainer. Kenny
> on the other hand is just stirring the pot and playing...
Show full article (9.71Kb)
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: Tim X
Date: Aug 22, 2008 17:43

"xahlee@gmail.com" gmail.com> writes:
> 2008-08-22
>
>> With respect to your claims regarding your writing being better than the
>> average english professor or journalist, I have to say your sadly
>> mistaken. Your expressive style actually...
Show full article (9.64Kb)
no comments
Re: Xah on Lisp         


Author: xahlee
Date: Aug 23, 2008 04:32

Tim X wrote:
> My mistake. I took your other claims of wanting to educate, teach and
> open the eyes of 'tech geekers' as genuine. I didn't realise you were
> deliberately trying to be annoying and offensive.

My “deliberately trying to be annoying and offensive”, as you put it,
can be likened to, say, the beautiful pussy Hypathia. She got dragged
naked to death by the Christans.

You can see a naked picture of her at:
http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/lacru/Charles_William_Mitchell.html
> I don't understand why you feel its an achievement to be a troll. There
> is little skill in achieving such a badge - in fact, many achieve it
> without wanting to or even trying.

i can't say it's a achievement or not. It's odd to even think of it
that way. In fact, the very existance of the concept, and the term,
“troll”, i take to be socially damaging. For detail, see:

“On Ignoring Trolls” (2002) by Xah Lee.
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/troll_ignorance.html

Quote:
Show full article (2.20Kb)
no comments
1 2