> parnell wrote:

>>> So we cannot reasonably draw any relevant conclusions from this data, at
>>> least not for Ubuntu where such trend data is not even available (AFAIK).

>

>> Yes we finally agree.

>

>>> Due to the aforementioned problems those data are not an accurate
>>> reflection of anything interesting and the conclusion stands.

>

>> Conclusion stands, I don't think so. Remember what you just said: "we
>> cannot reasonably draw any relevant conclusions from this data".

>
> Note that I was talking about the "recent" data that you analyzed and
> not the "installed" data that was analyzed in the article that I cited.
>

>> If you examine the graph of the old vs the recent you see that they
>> are nearly the inverse of each other and as recent jumps old falls.

>
> Yes. ...