|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: phi500acphi500ac
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:31
A tutorial for the functional programming language Nice:
http://www.discenda.org/Nice
I came across an interesting functional language called Nice. The
language is a dialect of ML, according to the author (Daniel
Bonniot). Since Nice is basically ML, it wouldn't be an exciting new
entry...
|
| Show full article (3.60Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Xah LeeXah Lee
Date: Dec 25, 2008 03:24
>>On Dec 10, 2:47 pm, John W Kennedy attglobal.net> wrote:
>>> C:
>
>>> #include
>>> #include
>
>>> void normal(int dim, float* x, float* a) {
>>> float sum = 0.0f;
>>> int i;
>>> float divisor;
>>> for (i = 0; i < dim; ++i) sum += x[i] * x[i];
>>> divisor = sqrt(sum);
>>> for (i = 0; i < dim; ++i) a[i] = x[i]/divisor;
>
>>> }
Due to the low level of C, this C example should perhaps then accept a
sequence of numbers separated by space, and print the output. Having
dimension as part of input is not acceptable.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
|
| |
4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Chung-chieh ShanChung-chieh Shan
Date: Dec 24, 2008 21:47
Nomen Nescio dizum.com> wrote in article dizum.com> in comp.lang.functional:
> How did Mogensen coax strong reduction out of a weak head reducer?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: FriedrichFriedrich
Date: Sep 22, 2008 22:16
I don't know whom to contact about it, but planet Erlang is really
often down. For a few days now I got something like "memory exhausted"
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 13 bytes) in
/ opt/data/planeterlang.org/pligg/class.template.php on line 594
I for my part see it as bad supposed for a system programming language
for 24/7 mode....
Regards
Friedrich
--
Please remove just-for-news- to reply via e-mail.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: StephenStephen
Date: Sep 22, 2008 16:40
Hello all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Avalda FPGA Developer v1.0
beta! It enables one to compile regular F# to RTL with parallel
programming semantics. Our aim is to help make FPGAs available to a
wider group of software programmers who may not have as much
experience with HDLs or FPGAs. Please visit Avalda's site to download
the beta and check out the blog!
cheers,
Stephen Afande
Avalda Corp.
http://www.avalda.com
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: lukasz.kusznerlukasz.kuszner
Date: Sep 21, 2008 11:35
We are delighted to announce a new international programming contest,
addressed first of all to high school students: High School
Programming League 2008/2009: http://hs.spoj.pl. The contest will
consist of 7 problem sets, each lasting about 5 weeks. The 1st problem
set has started on September 20 at 12:00. You are cordially invited to
participate!
Problem solutions in Ocaml, Haskell, Lisp, Scheme are welcome.
Sinerely Yours,
Åukasz Kuszner
www.sphere-research.com
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Benjamin L. RussellBenjamin L. Russell
Date: Sep 19, 2008 02:42
The thought has just occurred to me that conducting a public survey on
evolution across, familiarity with, and exposure to various
programming paradigms in students and practitioners of functional
programming could be illuminating in revealing the correlation between
degree of familiarity with and experience in
procedural/object-oriented programming paradigms, and ease of learning
functional programming in a non-strict, purely functional programming
language, such as Haskell or Clean.
Could you please outline your evolution as a functional programmer in
the following manner (preferably in this thread):
A) Your chronological evolution in programming languages; e.g. (in my
case):
>N-BASIC/N-80 BASIC (1983-1985) -> Pascal (1989) ->
>Common Lisp / Scheme (T) (1990) -> Scheme (T) (1991) ->
>C (1993) -> Scheme (T) (1994) -> Tutorial-D
>(in _Introduction to Database Systems, Seventh Edition_ by C. J. Date)
>(2000) -> Oracle SQL / PL/SQL (c. 2000-2001) -> Java (c. 2001) ->
>MIT/GNU Scheme (2005) / PLT Scheme (2005-now) ->
>Ruby (2007-2008) -> PLT Scheme / GHC Haskell (now)
|
| Show full article (9.75Kb) |
|
18 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Paul.BocaPaul.Boca
Date: Sep 13, 2008 04:03
(Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement)
Formal Aspects of Safety Critical Systems
BCS-FACS, the Safety-Critical Systems Club, and FME
9 December 2008
BCS London Offices
First Floor, The Davidson Building
5 Southampton Street
London WC2E 7HA
Formal methods have long been advocated as techniques for defect
avoidance in the development of safety-critical systems. They rely
on the use of rigorously defined mathematical abstractions to permit
precise modelling, analysis and verification of designs and code.
Although they have been seen as expensive 'high-end' technology,
advances in tool support, coupling of formal techniques with other
methods such as static analysis, and technical advances in areas
such as model checking have the potential to improve the
cost-effectiveness of formal techniques.
|
| Show full article (3.49Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|