> e p chandler wrote:
>
> ...
>

>> real,dimension(:,:),allocatable::A1(:,:)
>> real, dimension(:,:),allocatable::A3(:,:)
>> real,dimension(:),allocatable::A4(:)

>
> Well, it doesn't mean anything different, but why the redundant
> shape specifications of the variables? The above means the
> same as either:
>
> real,dimension(:,:),allocatable::A1
> real, dimension(:,:),allocatable::A3
> real,dimension(:),allocatable::A4
>
> or:
>
> real,allocatable::A1(:,:) ...