|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: jrsyangljrsyangl Date: Jul 21, 2008 19:27
I posted previously (7/10/08) about my problems getting NetCDF
binaries to work with gfortran. Feedback led me to install Cygwin and
try to get NetCDF to work there. There are still problems. I have some
tentative ideas about why, and wonder if anyone has any comments.
1) There are no native Windows NetCDF binaries for Fortran 9x, like
gfortran;
2) There are no Cygwin NetCDF binaries for 32 bit systems, like my 5
year old Pentium 4.
My options, therefore, are:
a) Try to get a (free) f77 compiler (f2c?);
b) Build a 32 bit NetCDF under Cygwin myself (gulp);
c) Buy a new 64 bit computer (double gulp).
I have contacted Unidata (NetCDF), but have yet to hear back. I would
appreciate feedback,especially about the complexity of option b). I am a
Meteorologist, not a computer specialist...
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr Ivan D. ReidDr Ivan D. Reid Date: Jul 22, 2008 00:43
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:27:17 GMT, jrsyangl verizon.net>
wrote in <9Abhk.291$5Q.95@trnddc06>:
> I posted previously (7/10/08) about my problems getting NetCDF
> binaries to work with gfortran. Feedback led me to install Cygwin and
> try to get NetCDF to work there. There are still problems. I have some
> tentative ideas about why, and wonder if anyone has any comments.
> 1) There are no native Windows NetCDF binaries for Fortran 9x, like
> gfortran;
> 2) There are no Cygwin NetCDF binaries for 32 bit systems, like my 5
> year old Pentium 4.
I don't know about NetCDF, but I've used cygwin for a long time.
> My options, therefore, are:
> a) Try to get a (free) f77 compiler (f2c?);
cygwin contains the g77 compiler.
> b) Build a 32 bit NetCDF under Cygwin myself (gulp);
Shouldn't be difficult if the process is well documented and/or
there's a good makefile.
> c) Buy a new 64 bit computer (double gulp).
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr Ivan D. ReidDr Ivan D. Reid Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:00
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:43:11 +0000 (UTC), Dr Ivan D. Reid
brunel.ac.uk>
wrote in loki.brunel.ac.uk>:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:27:17 GMT, jrsyangl verizon.net>
> wrote in <9Abhk.291$5Q.95@trnddc06>:
>> I posted previously (7/10/08) about my problems getting NetCDF
>> binaries to work with gfortran. Feedback led me to install Cygwin and
>> try to get NetCDF to work there. There are still problems. I have some
>> tentative ideas about why, and wonder if anyone has any comments.
>> 1) There are no native Windows NetCDF binaries for Fortran 9x, like
>> gfortran;
>> 2) There are no Cygwin NetCDF binaries for 32 bit systems, like my 5
>> year old Pentium 4.
> I don't know about NetCDF, but I've used cygwin for a long time.
>> My options, therefore, are:
>> a) Try to get a (free) f77 compiler (f2c?);
> cygwin contains the g77 compiler.
>> b) Build a 32 bit NetCDF under Cygwin myself (gulp);
|
| Show full article (2.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Craig PowersCraig Powers Date: Jul 22, 2008 06:28
jrsyangl wrote:
> I posted previously (7/10/08) about my problems getting NetCDF
> binaries to work with gfortran. Feedback led me to install Cygwin and
> try to get NetCDF to work there. There are still problems. I have some
> tentative ideas about why, and wonder if anyone has any comments.
> 1) There are no native Windows NetCDF binaries for Fortran 9x, like
> gfortran;
> 2) There are no Cygwin NetCDF binaries for 32 bit systems, like my 5
> year old Pentium 4.
> My options, therefore, are:
> a) Try to get a (free) f77 compiler (f2c?);
> b) Build a 32 bit NetCDF under Cygwin myself (gulp);
> c) Buy a new 64 bit computer (double gulp).
> I have contacted Unidata (NetCDF), but have yet to hear back. I would
> appreciate feedback,especially about the complexity of option b). I am...
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: jrsyangljrsyangl Date: Jul 22, 2008 18:11
I want to thank Ivan, Alois, and Craig for their help and encouragement
in dealing with my NetCDF problem. I have been able to build NetCDF4 and
run the sample program on my system. There was a slight diversion when,
at Unidata's suggestion, I tried to build with the new HDF5 option,
which caused out of memory errors during the make. I do not need this
option, but I guess the price of "free" software is that you sometimes
have to test beta versions. In any event, things went fairly smoothly
after removing this option. Thanks again.
Lou Umscheid
"jrsyangl" verizon.net> wrote in message
news:9Abhk.291$5Q.95@trnddc06...
> I posted previously (7/10/08) about my problems getting NetCDF
> binaries to work with gfortran. Feedback led...
|
| Show full article (1.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|