> wim gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Jul 9, 8:44 pm, nos...@see.signature (Richard Maine) wrote:

>>> Michael Prager noaa.gov> wrote:

>>>> Didn't you mention some time ago a make-makefile utility that
>>>> you use successfully?

>>>
>>> I've used Makedepf90 (google for it). There are several others, but
>>> that's the one that seemed to fit my particular needs best. Your mileage
>>> may vary, etc. It has been long enough since I looked that I don't
>>> recall what particular features pushed me to that one.

>>
>> Since version 2.6, cmake works also very good for Fortran:
>>
>> http://www.cmake.org

>
> I don't recall running into that one before. Interestingly (to me
> anyway), a quick search in the cmake wiki for Fortran material reveals
> that at least some of its Fortran parsing support came from makedepf90.