Re: "Final" Procedures
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.lang.fortran only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: "Final" Procedures         

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile
Author: e p chandler
Date: Sep 19, 2008 10:13

On Sep 19, 12:46 pm, Gary Scott sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Here's what I need in a "final" procedure.
>
> Of course normal termination isn't a problem, but I have various I/O
> boards that I need to ensure are properly terminated/safed (put in a
> known state (e.g. not transmitting, outputs reconfigured to inputs) in
> the event of a program crash.  This is in part to ensure that
> transmitters aren't overheated from prolonged operation (e.g. stuck in
> the xmit state) or shorted because someone starts dismantling the test
> setup thinking that the devices are automatically safed upon program
> crash.
>
> How is that handled normally?  Will any of the new f2k3, f2k8 features
> help me in this area (fault detection/recovery)?

What about adding a second job step that just turns everything off?

- e
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: NSVMVC: 1/8e finales CL (I) & UEFA Cup 1/16e finales (II)nl.sport.voetbal ·