|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: delyndelyn Date: Aug 15, 2008 14:21
Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
|
| |
|
| | 53 Comments |
|
|
Author: nonenone Date: Aug 15, 2008 14:30
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:08 -0700, delyn wrote:
> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
What is in your code that is so specific to PowerStation? The Intel
compiler comes with lots of PowerStation compatability options, including,
if I remember correctly, the ability to read PS-formatted binary files. We
recently took some old code where the only PS-specific need was to read
binary input files, theknowledge of the contents of which are lost, but
are vital (they define some rivers we were modelling); and it worked fine.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: nospamnospam Date: Aug 15, 2008 15:51
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:08 -0700, delyn wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
>> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
>> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
>
> What is in your code that is so specific to PowerStation? The Intel
> compiler comes with lots of PowerStation compatability options,...
Maybe I missed something, but I didn't notice that the OP said anything
about PowerStation. He was asking for CVF, not for MS PowerStation. Did
you perhaps misread the "Power Flow"?
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Paul van DelstPaul van Delst Date: Aug 15, 2008 15:53
none wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:08 -0700, delyn wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
>> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
>> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
>
> What is in your code that is so specific to PowerStation?
Off the top of my head, reading the OP, I would hazard to say: nothing.
Last I checked, FPS and CVF were completely different products.
cheers,
paulv
> The Intel
> compiler comes with lots of PowerStation compatability options, including,
> if I remember correctly, the ability to read PS-formatted binary files. We
> recently took some old code where the only PS-specific need was to read
> binary input files, theknowledge of the contents of which are lost, but
> are vital (they define some rivers we were modelling); and it worked fine.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gary ScottGary Scott Date: Aug 15, 2008 17:12
Paul van Delst wrote:
> none wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:08 -0700, delyn wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
>>> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
>>> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
>>
>>
>> What is in your code that is so specific to PowerStation?
>
>
> Off the top of my head, reading the OP, I would hazard to say: nothing.
>
> Last I checked, FPS and CVF were completely different products.
Well, yes, but CVF implemented nearly all FPS extensions. Still wrong
question being answered, I assume.
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Luka DjigasLuka Djigas Date: Aug 15, 2008 17:40
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:12:25 -0500, Gary Scott
sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>Well, yes, but CVF implemented nearly all FPS extensions. Still wrong
>question being answered, I assume.
>
>>
Yes, ... well, maybe not all, but a great deal of them. There was some
confusion with the names, as I remember (same thing, different name).
I could be wrong though, 'twas some time ago.
I find that one of the main differences between the two was that cvf
was much more "strict" about the code. With fps you could compile and
build things which wouldn't go through any other compiler.
best regards
ldigas
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gary ScottGary Scott Date: Aug 15, 2008 18:06
Luka Djigas wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:12:25 -0500, Gary Scott
> sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >>Well, yes, but CVF implemented nearly all FPS extensions. Still wrong
>>question being answered, I assume.
>>
>>
>
> Yes, ... well, maybe not all, but a great deal of them. There was some
> confusion with the names, as I remember (same thing, different name).
> I could be wrong though, 'twas some time ago.
>
> I find that one of the main differences between the two was that cvf
> was much more "strict" about the code. With fps you could compile and
> build things which wouldn't go through any other compiler.
The one that got me was file-scope variables and INTERFACE TO.
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jan Gerrit KootstraJan Gerrit Kootstra Date: Aug 16, 2008 01:41
delyn wrote:
> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
Delyn,
I have one, V6.6 Profesional. I do not use it anymore, but I am afraid
that it might not install anymore due to license experation.
Like other posters state, is the Intel Visual Fortran not a better choice?
Kind regards,
Jan Gerrit Kootstra
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: delyndelyn Date: Aug 16, 2008 06:13
On Aug 16, 3:41 am, Jan Gerrit Kootstra kootstra.org.uk>
wrote:> delyn wrote:
>> Does anyone have a Compaq Visual Fortran compiler that they would not
>> mind parting with? I am willing to buy one. Old Power flow software
>> I have will only work with a Compaq fortran compiler.
>
> Delyn,
>
> I have one, V6.6 Profesional. I do not use it anymore, but I am afraid
> that it might not install anymore due to license experation.
>
> Like other posters state, is the Intel Visual Fortran not a better choice?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jan Gerrit Kootstra
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: dpbdpb Date: Aug 16, 2008 06:43
delyn wrote:
> On Aug 16, 3:41 am, Jan Gerrit Kootstra kootstra.org.uk>
> wrote:...
>> I have one, V6.6 Profesional. I do not use it anymore, but I am afraid
>> that it might not install anymore due to license experation.
>>
>> Like other posters state, is the Intel Visual Fortran not a better choice?
...
> I have not tried it with Intel. But Siemens who owns the power flow
> software states that it will only work with CVF. Siemens puts out a
> CVF upgrade that might work even if it does not install properly. I
> would be willing to buy your copy and try to install it. It is a
> risk, but less risking than trying Intel I think.
...
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
