comp.lang.fortran
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.lang.fortran only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
comp.lang.fortran Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Protect yourself against Operation Sudden Fall         


Author: Walter.Heiting
Date: May 9, 2008 17:50

Law enforcement is now intercepting text messages,
as proven by Operation Sudden Fall in San Diego.

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/states/newsrel/sd050608.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080506-1338-bn06sdsu2.html

Don't let your personal SMS/text messages fall into
the wrong hands. Encrypt your messages with one
of these:

http://www.CryptoSMS.org
http://www.CryptoSMS.com
http://www.FortressMail.net/fortress_sms.htm
http://www.Cop2p.com/encrypted_sms.html

Be Safe, Be Encrypted, Fuck the Police!!

--
To be decent or angry will issue distinctive cottons to nervously reinforce.
no comments
  Perverse G77 syntax extension         


Author: Dr Ivan D. Reid
Date: May 9, 2008 14:27

A message came by on a CERN mailing list today regarding compiling
our application framework on GCC4, which necessarily entails switching
from G77 to gfortran.

The code that barfed was a declaration:

COMPLEX FUNCTION LI2*16(X)

I tried it and it _is_ accepted by G77 (but not by gfortran).

Out of which left-field did this extension come?

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
3 Comments
  Can "Final subroutines" in F2003 delete pointer components in a class?         


Author: Simulate
Date: May 9, 2008 02:51

or the pointer components must be deleted by programmers themselves?
10 Comments
  CMPLX and constant folding         


Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 9, 2008 02:11

gfortran does constant folding so aggressively that one has to be
careful when testing it. I have seen several instances lately
where it yields the correct answer if its constant folding
mechanism can come into play, but will be tripped up if not.
Another case in point:

C:\gfortran\james\cmplx>type test0.f90
module mykinds
implicit none
integer, parameter :: sp = selected_real_kind(6,37)
integer, parameter :: dp = selected_real_kind(15,307)
integer, parameter :: ep = selected_real_kind(18,4931)
integer, parameter :: qp_preferred = selected_real_kind(33,4931)
integer, parameter :: qp = (1+sign(1,qp_preferred))/2*qp_preferred+ &
(1-sign(1,qp_preferred))/2*ep
end module mykinds
Show full article (7.51Kb)
9 Comments