Re: Request for Discussion -- (( and multiline comments
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.lang.forth only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

comp.lang.forth Profile…
 Up
Re: Request for Discussion -- (( and multiline comments         


Author: werty
Date: Feb 1, 2007 12:15

NO ! NO ! No ! Do not agree on common
names , force them to use your No-Text G.U.I.

If they hack your code , it behoves them to
create new icons , as they are hacking !

The Paradigm , is they can't go back to text !

Impossible ! Try it you'll see what i mean .

You CAN argue English ,
but who argues the Textless ,
wavy line on a traffic sign :
~~~~~~~
( dangerous curve ahead )

everyone , even C prgrammers , slow
down and turn the wheel left , as they should .

My Forth has no text , expecially not Buzz Word
Text .
1 Comment
Re: Request for Discussion -- (( and multiline comments         


Author: Bruce McFarling
Date: Feb 1, 2007 15:36

On Feb 1, 3:15 pm, "werty" swissinfo.org> wrote:
> Try it you'll see what i mean .

Sure. Where's the URL?

Though I admit, I have trouble coming up with names sometimes ...
designing an icon for each new word I define is a bit daunting.
no comments