>Erik Max Francis wrote:

>> Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

>

>> The problem with all this puffing is that your
>> original comment _did_ contain that implication.

>
>Only to a lunatic.
>

>> "Murray has been flogging his claim to have
>> 'solved A.I.' since long before computers with
>> capacities capable of doing any such thing were
>> available" implies pretty clearly that such
>> capacities are available now,

>
>Not to any sane person it doesn't.