A quine much like this was submitted here:
http://www.nyx.net/~gthompso/quine.htm
This is a quine (assuming your 'see' generates *exactly* the same
thing), but it's obviously specific to a particular implementation of
Forth. In the implementation of Forth I currently have handy (pForth),
I see this when I execute 'quine':
( 40179A3C ) S" SEE QUINE" EVALUATE ;
So no, at least for this particular implementation of Forth, 'see' is
not a sufficient quine generator since the output isn't the same as the
input.
Those wondering why any of this matters should actually try to write a
quine that doesn't depend on having a decompiler. It's not a trivial
problem and it can lead to some interesting insights.
