> We (the Win32forth group) and Tom Zimmer don't know anything about the
> modifications or the author, but if anyone is interested (and can read/
> write Chinese), perhaps this link could be used to get a copy;

> Plenty of screenshots. How cool is that?

>Coincidentally, I am now using a gforth program I've written to study
>Chinese (now that 0.6.9-20070604 compiles on OpenBSD-zaurus). The
>original program that did the job was so terribly easy that I've gone
>on to write clever input methods:
>
>in) hz ba1 cheng2
>i/o) ba1 ( chinese here, selected by arrow-key and RET )
>i/o) cheng2 ( ditto )
>out) ce: BACH ba1cheng2 \ BACH is chinese; this line is yellow
>in) en eighty percent
>out) ce: BACH ba1cheng2 eighty percent \ ditto, and this is pushed
>onto a list
>
>to more quickly build wordlists. All of this directly using big5
>and gb2312 (EUC-CN), and assuming a friendly terminal.

> Julian Fondren gmail.com> writes:

>>to more quickly build wordlists. All of this directly using big5
>>and gb2312 (EUC-CN), and assuming a friendly terminal.

>
> Have you used the xchars stuff for that? Any experiences to report?

>Anton Ertl wrote:

>> Julian Fondren gmail.com> writes:

>>>to more quickly build wordlists. All of this directly using big5
>>>and gb2312 (EUC-CN), and assuming a friendly terminal.

>>
>> Have you used the xchars stuff for that? Any experiences to report?

>
>No. I had the idea that it was Unicode- and UTF8-centric, and left
>it alone.