|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Michael YardleyMichael Yardley
Date: Aug 5, 2007 03:22
On Aug 3, 9:35 pm, "_ G O D _" TELUS.NET> wrote:
> WA women inmates allege sex assaults
> Seattle, WA, USA
> The Washington state prison system is
> investigating allegations that four male
> guards at the main women's penitentiary
> sexually assaulted two inmates. ... http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/64=
20AP_WA_Inmate_Sex_Probe.html
>
> Prison closure postponed
> Escanaba, MI, USA
> "Michigan has the sixth largest prison system,
> a very high rate of recidivism, and long prison
> stays due to mandatory sentencing guidelines....http://www.dailypress.net=
/stories/articles.asp?articleID=3D12584
> ...
|
| Show full article (7.82Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: J. MorenoJ. Moreno
Date: Oct 1, 2006 17:15
>> So, I'm migrating a site from my test-server (Powerbook running
>> Apache/Darwin BSD) to my web host and all my CGI scripts are giving me
>> that error. The header error is also the only error that's showing up
>> in the error_log.
>
> And in the suexec log?
>
>> file permissions (775)
>
> Too permissive. A security-minded server will refuse to run it.
>
> Also check other 'usual suspects' such as SELinux.
I recently saw a similar problem, where the server was refusing to run a
script because the DIRECTORY it was in was world-writeable (how the
directory became world writable is another question....).
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: mattmatt
Date: Sep 29, 2006 10:37
Hello all,
So, I'm migrating a site from my test-server (Powerbook running
Apache/Darwin BSD) to my web host and all my CGI scripts are giving me
that error. The header error is also the only error that's showing up
in the error_log.
I've checked all the usual suspects:
file permissions (775)
syntax (perl -Tc is clean)
malformed headers (using CGI.pm->header(), so not likely)
script runs fine from command line on web server (which I believe rules
out binary transfer and carraige returns)
The site is on a managed server which has an automated setup process,
so its highly unlikely that this is a bad ScriptAlias directive.
Any thoughts?
Matt
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: MaverickMaverick
Date: Sep 27, 2006 16:50
Hi All,
I am new to CGI, I thought you people might be able to help me:
My HTML code:
--------
CGI Multiplication Example
--------
|
| Show full article (1.94Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Jane KnoxJane Knox
Date: Aug 18, 2006 21:46
Okay, I have cgiemail set up at my host, and it works. But, I have a
template and an html order form with over 1200 check boxes, each check box
is a different product, and what I want to do is have the template email
what products the customer checks off. I have everything set up, and it
work except for one thing. No matter what items are checked off all I get
in the email is the work "checked". That's it, no product name.
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance for any advise on this problem. It's been driving me
nuts for several days now, and I just know it something stupid that I'm
missing.
--
PLEASE NOTE: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi is a
SELF-MODERATED newsgroup. aa.net and boutell.com are
NOT the originators of the articles and are NOT responsible
for their content.
HOW TO POST to comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi:
http://www.thinkspot.net/ciwac/howtopost.html
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Bill SegravesBill Segraves
Date: Aug 11, 2006 21:17
> So, is there a problem with security in the CGI-Email script, or just
> with my template?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Bill SegravesBill Segraves
Date: Aug 11, 2006 17:37
> I changed the cgi-bin/cgiemail/... to cgi-echo, which sets it to test
> mode, nothing actually gets sent.
>
But you didn't delete the offending template, which is still live.
> Alright, everyone, please take 10 deep breaths before flaming me about
> spam. The form has not been live for more than 10 minutes at a time.
>
No one is flaming you about spam. We're simply pointing out to you that what
you're doing is a very bad thing to do.
> I searched Google with my problems before. Like I have said, I am a
> noob. (as ALL of you were at one time.)
>
> I came to Google groups with my problem, expecting to receive help.
>
No, you came to thousands of people who are Usenet users. The fact that
Google groups also post to and archive Usenet newsgroups is irrelevant.
|
| Show full article (2.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|