Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell telephone monopoly.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
comp.dcom.telecom only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

comp.dcom.telecom Profile…
 Up
Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell telephone monopoly.         


Author: Monty Solomon
Date: Jun 11, 2008 17:52

iSurrender
Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell
telephone monopoly.

By Tim Wu
Slate Magazine
Posted Tuesday, June 10, 2008, at 3:13 PM ET

If my iPhone were a motorcycle, she'd be a chopper. I'm the owner of
an unlocked, jail-broken iPhone 1.3 that runs on the T-Mobile
network, fortified with third-party apps (like Tap Tap Revolution),
adorned with Death Star wall paper, and running a natty customized
interface named "Manhattan." Sure, not everything works perfectly
(recently, the clock went off by an hour or so, for no apparent
reason). But that's part of the fun of iPhone-modding, a vibrant
scene that resembles the Apple II culture of the 1980s.

Unfortunately, for me at least, it may all be coming to an end. After
Monday's iPhone 2.0 debut, it's just a matter of time before I trade
in my chopper phone for Apple's new 3G phone-and swallow that AT&T
contract.
Show full article (2.92Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell telephone monopoly. [telecom]         


Author: hancock4
Date: Jun 13, 2008 18:40

On Jun 11, 8:52 pm, Monty Solomon roscom.com> wrote:

I have some problems with this article.
> By Tim Wu
> Slate Magazine
> Posted Tuesday, June 10, 2008, at 3:13 PM ET
> But that's part of the fun of iPhone-modding, a vibrant
> scene that resembles the Apple II culture of the 1980s.

When I pick up a phone I want a dial tone and the ability to simply
dial my desired party's number. If someone calls me the phone should
ring.
>(recently, the clock went off by an hour or so, for no apparent reason).

I, and I suspect the vast majority of consumers, have little interest
in "modding" their telephone sets, especially if it screws up basic
features. Clocks were invented how long ago, weren't they? I think
by now they should have it right and reliable. If your tinkering
messed up the clock, you don't know what you're doing and shouldn't be
messing with the internals.
Show full article (4.03Kb)
no comments
Re: Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell telephone monopoly. [telecom]         


Author: Geoffrey Welsh
Date: Jun 15, 2008 17:53

hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> Clocks were invented how long ago, weren't they?
> I think by now they should have it right and reliable.

... except that governments (by which I mean primarily the U.S. Congress)
decided that time should change on certain dates and then, after much
technology was deployed with that exception hard-coded into it, changed the
dates on which time changed. The original author said "recently, the clock
went off by an hour or so, for no apparent reason" without noting whether
"recently" meant the first Sunday in April, which one might be forgiven for
not remembering as the date on which DST used to commence. While the iPhone
itself may be new, there are probably bits of code in it which pre-date the
change to DST.
> ***** Moderator's Note *****
> Theory and practice differ. In theory, competition is good - until the
> practice of oligopoly competition robs consumers of any meaningful
> choice between virtually (pun intended) identical offerings from
> companies virtually identical to that old whore Ma Bell.
Show full article (3.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Apple's new iPhone augurs the inevitable return of the Bell telephone monopoly. [telecom]         


Author: hancock4
Date: Jun 16, 2008 09:33

On Jun 15, 8:53 pm, "Geoffrey Welsh" wrote:
>> Clocks were invented how long ago, weren't they?
>> I think by now they should have it right and reliable.
>
>  ... except that governments (by which I mean primarily the
> U.S. Congress) decided that time should change on certain dates and
> then, after much technology was deployed with that exception
> hard-coded into it, changed the dates on which time changed.  The
> original author said "recently, the clock went off by an hour or so,
> for no apparent reason" without noting whether "recently" meant the
> first Sunday in April, which one might be forgiven for not
> remembering as the date on which DST used to commence.  While the
> iPhone itself may be new, there are probably bits of code in it
> which pre-date the change to DST.

To me, that automated change to DST was bad planning and design.
Every automatic function should have a manual backup.
Show full article (2.24Kb)
no comments