... 19, 10:04 pm, Fred Weiss <fredwe...@papertig.com> wrote: On Sep 19, 12:00 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn.com> wrote: re: TRILLION DOLLARS BAILOUT Bush-Paulson should done something radical over a year ago. Very true. If they had they wouldn't have had to do what they've done since or in the last few days - and it wouldn't have cost the ...

On Sep 19, 10:04 pm, Fred Weiss <fredwe...@papertig.com> wrote: On Sep 19, 12:00 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn.com> wrote: re: TRILLION DOLLARS BAILOUT Bush-Paulson should done something radical over a year ago. Very true. If they had they wouldn't have had to do what they've done since or in the last few days - and it wouldn't have cost the taxpayers a penny. ...

On Sep 19, 12:00 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn.com> wrote: re: TRILLION DOLLARS BAILOUT Bush-Paulson should done something radical over a year ago. Very true. If they had they wouldn't have had to do what they've done since or in the last few days - and it wouldn't have cost the taxpayers a penny. If you've been bailing out your spendthrift son for years, the radical thing to ...

re: TRILLION DOLLARS BAILOUT Bush-Paulson should done something radical over a year ago. I had thought pay off the f'ing defaults, and simultaneously the bad credit risks (defaulters) would get new mortgages of ever how many years they need: up to perhaps 50 or more years they'd be paying off their ambitious follies THIS WOULD'VE HELPED THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE (MIXED SYSTEM) MORE ...

... is a bad risk or good risk Isn't this precisely what gov't policy encouraged? Add to that flooding the market with easy credit in order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" philosophy you let me know. If the the processes are flawed (nothing is foolproof), then one can bet that flaws ...

... is a bad risk or good risk Isn't this precisely what gov't policy encouraged? Add to that flooding the market with easy credit in order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" philosophy you let me know. If the the processes are flawed (nothing is foolproof), then one can bet that flaws ...

... order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" ... employees felt cheated/bamboozled/victimized So Congress regulates corporations through more corporate financial disclosures, and yet the Oxley-Sarbannes Reform has also SUPPOSEDLY caused the mega-complicated corporation nightmare problems in their complex more open balance sheeting...

... buyer is a bad risk or good risk Isn't this precisely what gov't policy encouraged? Add to that flooding the market with easy credit in order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" philosophy you let me know. If the the processes are flawed (nothing is foolproof), then one can bet that flaws will be ...

... order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" ... employees felt cheated/bamboozled/victimized So Congress regulates corporations through more corporate financial disclosures, and yet the Oxley-Sarbannes Reform has also SUPPOSEDLY caused the mega-complicated corporation nightmare problems in their complex more open balance sheeting...

... buyer is a bad risk or good risk Isn't this precisely what gov't policy encouraged? Add to that flooding the market with easy credit in order to keep interest rates low. When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" philosophy you let me know. If the the processes are flawed (nothing is foolproof), then one can bet that flaws will be ...