On May 5, 10:57 pm, "Chom Noamsky" wrote:
>> "agsf_57"
yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Because without a firm moral core, you are more capable of fornicating
>> outside of wedlock and killing babies than someone who believes in,
>> fears and respects God's word.>
> "God" never mentioned anything about abortion,
I wouldn't know, but I doubt God would approve.
> but he did kill the firstborn
> babies of Egypt.
Man, afraid of losing his superficial power, ordered the death of the
first born. Or the story goes...
>> And since you are capable of such a
>> thing, this article might enlighten your perspective about sex after
>> abortion, thus causing you to refrain from abortion. Maybe there is a
>> small chance that you even give up sex outside of marriage, in fear
>> that you might get pregnant (or impregnate a woman), thus forcing you
>> to consider abortion as a means of ending the pregnancy. And to think,
>> it all started because some guy posted an article about the
>> displeasures of sex after abortion on a newsgroup. Do you see the
>> light now?
>
> The flaw in your religious nutter logic is assuming married women don't have
> abortions.
God loving/fearing religious married women don't have abortions. It's
the corrupt, un-moral women and men who perverse marriage by engaging
in the act without fully understanding the vows and level of
committment to both God and one another. For example, gays and
lesbians, fornicators, murders (aka people who have abortions) and
other sinners.
The logic makes sense, even for the non-religious like me. Whether or
not you want to accept it is another thing. For example, I understood
the OP's intention, but I personally disagree with it because of my
personal opinion that women are creatures of emotion and, like
children, will continue to make the same mistakes unless held
responsible for their actions.
Regards...
