|
|
Up |
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: bobgnotebobgnote
Date: Jun 30, 2008 18:45
Churning of illegal courts and administrations has conflicted with
corporations, in a deadly nuisance, which defies relief, as a
conspiracy to obstrucft justice, where seditious conspiracy,
conspiracy to interagency fraud, and RICO r.p.m. takes also civil
rights, to evade 18 U.S.C. 245, conspiracy against civil rights of
citizens, of the USA. Foreign and interstate media cheat review.
Since 2001, deregulated energy deals have ravaged us, with inflation,
edited from the GDP, while income from profiteering RICO-evaders and
PACs illegally inflates the deeply-tainted GDP. All transactions
since the illegal editing are suspect, aggravated by illegal interest
income, 2004-7, from the bizarre, seditious FED and World Bank usury,
ordered during bizarre NAFTA, without border security or domestic
control of aliens, illegally interested in our daily agendas and
molesting our funding and processes.
No regulated militias issue. All standing armies are aggravated, by
illegal establishments, unnoticed, with BILLS OF ATTAINDER making a
mockery of commerce and enforcements, to violate all major articles,
including USCA 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,13,14.
|
| Show full article (16.56Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: calderhomecalderhome
Date: Jun 30, 2008 17:01
WE GO NUCLEAR, OR WE GO EXTINCT!
Nuclear power is the only technology that can produce an
extremely high volume of energy using just a tiny amount of land and
at reasonable cost, all without emitting significant amounts of
greenhouse...
|
| Show full article (8.06Kb) |
|
7 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Richard ChildersRichard Childers
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:35
Stolen Dali Sketch Recovered At San Francisco Family Court Hearing
(You're not going to believe this, but a piece of stolen art was
returned, during a hearing on a restraining order - and the Court, in
its wisdom, did not think that the plaintiff keeping a piece of stolen
art for fourteen years, was a good reason for the defendant to be
bothering the plaintiff ... EVEN AFTER THE PLAINTIFF RETURNED THE STOLEN
ART, DURING THE HEARING ITSELF!)
(Defendant asks how he is supposed to ask the plaintiff if she even has
the art in question [and, it turns out, that she did] if the plaintiff
refuses to engage in a simple dialog of question and answer, and instead
chooses to accumulate defendant's letters as proof that plaintiff is
being harassed? Defendant feels as if he is Alice, and has wandered into
Wonderland.)
(Who's heard of an art thief using a restraining order, to interfere
with the owner's legitimate attempts to recover his stolen property? ...
Only in San Francisco Family Court, folks.)
4.5 Missing Salvador Dali sketch
Defendant observes that plaintiff has also retained a piece of
defendant’s personal property.
|
| Show full article (2.53Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: thylacoleocarnifexthylacoleocarnifex
Date: Jun 30, 2008 10:41
She's worth $100 million, but doesn't think she should have to pay. A
little example of what's in store if John becomes president. Only
little people pay taxes? Leona Helmsley would LOVE this lady!
http://www.newsweek.com/id/143775
|
| |
|
3 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|