bit.listserv.ispf-l
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
bit.listserv.ispf-l only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006    
total
bit.listserv.ispf-l Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  ^*^*^^ Free Girls Gone Wild Videos ^*^*^*^         


Author: GGG Promo
Date: Jan 13, 2007 12:02

no comments
  Re: Please no more advertisements on our lists         


Author: Russell West
Date: Jan 10, 2007 15:59

At 20:04 01/09/2007, Automatic DIGEST processor wrote:
>Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:31:47 -0600
>From: "McKown, John" HEALTHMARKETS.COM>
>Subject: Re: Please no more advertisements on our lists
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>I don't mind the occassional commercial post. However, I think the only
>person whose opinion matters is the list owner. Is there a documented
>stance for the list on this issue?

The old phrase one man's ceiling is another man's floor applies to individual tolerances. What is tolerated by an individual cannot be assumed as tolerable for all.

RFC 1855 defines guidelines for list usage as well as other internet public forum types. Basically it states messages should be centered on the dedicated subject common to all subscribers. IOW, stay on topic. Receiving messages that describe the way ISPF functions is what this list is supposed to be used for. Advertising one's own commercial business doesn't even come close to basic reason for this list's existence.

I work as an independent contractor myself, but I don't promote my business here. This list would quickly be diluted if everyone who had a commercial business promoted their interests here.

And for those who might be thinking that anyone who doesn't like this can delete these messages without reading them should try setting their subscription mode to DIGEST. Not only would they see they are forced to read through every message, but they would also realize why some of the other guidelines are more important than they first thought.

BTW, there is nothing wrong with mentioning you have a business as a side note of the main on-topic message. Then if people are really interested in conducting business with the poster, they can contact them OFFLINE.

I appreciate that Steve apologized for his ads, but I would have preferred that been done privately. Then others replied via the list (instead of directly to him) that they could tolerate the ads occasionally. That is their personal preference and it varies from person to person.

In a sense, this thread is offline. If anyone disagrees with what I wrote here, please be considerate towards those who don't appreciate off-topic threads and reply directly to me.

\russ
no comments
  ~~~~~+++ (!) Free Pussy!         


Author: Goofball
Date: Jan 10, 2007 10:17

no comments
  ~~~~~+++ (!) Free Pussy!         


Author: Goofball
Date: Jan 10, 2007 10:06

no comments
  Re: So, OK, no more promotions from me after this one         


Author: ispf-l6
Date: Jan 9, 2007 20:31

Steve Comstock wrote on 1/9/2007 8:56 AM:
> Recently I got a post on the ISPF list objecting to my
> posting announcements of new courses and offerings on
> the list.
>
> In response, I've gotten a number of emails both on- and
> off-list from people who say they don't mind seeing my announcements from
> time to time. As well as a few who say
> they agree with the objections to my doing this.
>
> At the same time, I understand and respect the tradition
> of usenets and listservs being mostly promotion-free
> forums for the exchanging of ideas.

Ok, ISPF-L listowner stepping in here.
Show full article (2.30Kb)
no comments
  Re: Interesting(?) observation.         


Author: Jeff Byrum
Date: Jan 9, 2007 10:44

Cool! It works just fine in my Windows-based text editor as well -- and
I already know how to use that! It would work even in MS/Word.

Just change all:

,ODSN=

To:

,^p// ODSN=

(the character after the comma in the "to" string is a caret -- ASCII 5E
-- ^p is a special symbol used by MS/Word (and some other text editors)
to represent a new-line character.

-----Original Message-----
From: ISPF discussion list [mailto:ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:56 AM
To: ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu
Subject: Interesting(?) observation.
Show full article (3.66Kb)
no comments
  Re: Interesting(?) observation.         


Author: Gary Green
Date: Jan 9, 2007 10:09

Now THAT is a keeper!

Thanks.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:55 , 'McKown, John' HEALTHMARKETS.COM> sent:
>Well, it was to me. I don't know how many out there use z/OS UNIX for
>much of anything. But I have found an "interesting" thing. I create JCL
>and often exceed the 72 character line length. This is a...
Show full article (3.25Kb)
no comments
  Re: Interesting(?) observation.         


Author: McKown, John
Date: Jan 9, 2007 09:47

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ISPF discussion list [mailto:ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu] On
> Behalf Of Ray, Ian
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:22 AM
> To: ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu
> Subject: Re: Interesting(?) observation.
>
>
> I know this is not the point, but I can't resist it ...
>
> Judicious use of SET statements is great for shortening JCL lines:
>
> //SETP SET P=IRRADU00
> //SETI SET I=HDCBAK.SMFDUMP
> //SETO SET O=TSH009.IRRADU00
> //*
> //STEP0010 EXEC &P,IDSN=&I(-0),ODSN=&O(+1)
> //*
> //* etc.
> //* ...
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
  Re: Interesting(?) observation.         


Author: Ray, Ian
Date: Jan 9, 2007 09:35

I know this is not the point, but I can't resist it ...

Judicious use of SET statements is great for shortening JCL lines:

//SETP SET P=IRRADU00
//SETI SET I=HDCBAK.SMFDUMP
//SETO SET O=TSH009.IRRADU00
//*
//STEP0010 EXEC &P,IDSN=&I(-0),ODSN=&O(+1)
//*
//* etc.
//*
//STEP0530 EXEC &P,IDSN=&I(-52),ODSN=&O(+52)

Ian



I then duplicate the above line 52 times (total of 53 lines). Well,
that's not exactly how I did it, but it is what I ended up with (to make
a long, boring story shorter). I then ended up with:
Show full article (2.33Kb)
no comments
  Re: Interesting(?) observation.         


Author: McKown, John
Date: Jan 9, 2007 09:25

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ISPF discussion list [mailto:ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu] On
> Behalf Of Seibert, Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:33 AM
> To: ISPF-L@listserv.nd.edu
> Subject: Re: Interesting(?) observation.
>
>
> And if you want an old-fashioned edit macro to do the trick,
> here's one
> I wrote many years ago:
> No warranties or anything... Blah blah...
>


> Dave

Nice. Thanks!
Show full article (1.07Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9