|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: A Leminiscate is a Leminiscate -- How and Why they're More-than-Useful |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: bionet.neuroscience · Group Profile
Author: kenken Date: Mar 24, 2008 03:58
"ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:FWoFj.1119$Xl2.1070@trndny01...
| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:I_1Fj.628$vD1.254@trndny09...
|| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:DvEBj.7576$y83.6954@trndny06...
||| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:4waBj.5471$Y33.4456@trndny07...
|||| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:SkZAj.3561$y83.2238@trndny06...
||||| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:ChAAj.149$iD2.136@trndny09...
|||||| "ken" havagoodday.org> wrote in message news:IO8Aj.6066$H%%3.531@trndny01...
||||||| [...]
||| [...]
|| [...]
|| It doesn't take much processing-pow-
|| er to accomplish "leminiscating" --
|| Bees, Dragon Flies, Mosquitoes, etc.,
|| can do it be-cause it doesn't take
|| much processing-power.
||
|| It doesn't take much processing-pow-
|| er be-cause a Leminiscate "hovers"-
|| around the 'point'-of-'criticality', with
|| any necessary "adjustments" being
|| coupled-to deviations-from-'criticality'.
|
| " 'criticality' " being Rigorously-Defined,
| 'within' nervous systems' STHs, with ex-
| clusive-respect to TD E/I and TD E/I-
| minimization.
| [...]
"deviations-from-'criticality' " are 100%%
'instances' of relative-TD E/I(up) that're
Rigorously-mapped in nervous systems'
"special topological homeomorphisms"
["STH"; AoK, "Short Paper".]
When such TD E/I(up) "deviations-from-
criticality" occur, all any nervous system
has to do with respect to them is to, 'blind'-
ly-and-automatically, achieve TD E/I-min-
imization with respect to them, and the
supersystem [AoK, Ap5; "system of sys-
tems"] will 'move toward' enabling it's
host-organism to 'move toward' Survival-
"sufficiency" with respect its 'instantan-
eous' external-experiential-environment-
al 3D-Energydynamics ["3D-E".]
Which's a =SPECTATULARLY= Enorm-
ously-Powerful Information-Processing
'strategy' that Maps Infinities-of-Infin-
ities, Whole, in the =ONE= way.
The information-processing capacity
is Infinite be-cause the 3D-E of any
organism's external-experiential-en-
vironment are, themselves, infinitely-
variable -- which confronts all organ-
isms with the Problem of "knowing
how [and why] to 'move' with respect
to this Infinite-variability,
Which is Compounded when other org-
anisms, each doing their own TD E/I-
minimizations, are included-in the "ex-
ternal-experien-tial-environment" in
which =any= organism 'instantane-
ously'-exists, resulting in an Infinity-of-
Infinities [AoK, Ap1] -- even in the case
of any two organisms, because each
organism confronts the other as an
infinitely-variable stimulus-set 'within'
the infinite-variability of "the rest" of
the 'instantaneous'-external-experien-
tial-environment that the two organisms
'share'.
[It's =Deep=. Give it the energy that
Working-it-through requires, and you'll
not be 'sorry' -- it's one of those 'things'
that exists as a 'door' through which
one's understanding must 'move' if one
is to be able to continue one's Progress
in 'moving toward' "understanding nerv-
ous-system function. [Which is why it's
in AoK, Ap. =One= :-]
Not that one'll 'be sorry' if one doesn't
give it the energy it requires.
One'll 'just' be unable to 'move'-through-
the-'door', which'll 'result' in the occur-
rence of a nebulously-generalized TD
E/I(up) condition [the "slow-burning"-
ness that's discussed in AoK, Ap8] with
respect to virtually-everything that one
experiences -- which's been the con-
dition in which 'all' Human Beings have
'existed' since the first humans 'til the
'present-day', which's why War breaks-
out 'periodically', when nervous sys-
tems "go amygdalar" [AoK, Ap5] dur-
ing the courses of groupwise-'interac-
tive' dynamics [across Populations of
all relative-sizes -- the "slow-burning"-
ness augments until "amygdar-priming"
thresholds [AoK, Ap5] are groupwise-
exceeded across Populations-->low-
'level' amygdalar-taking-over "super-
system [re-]configuration-->the be-
havioral-"crap-shooting"-that-is-what-
"War"-physically-is.]
Which 'stuff' NDT's understanding En-
ables folks to Transcend -- but only
to the degree that this sort of "Deep"-
stuff is "understood" -- to the degree
that it becomes instantiated 'within'
"biological mass" [AoK, Ap5.]
So it's Worth-the-energy to work-
through this "Deep" stuff.
Or, one can just See that Jesus
said everything that's entailed, in
Elegantly-Simple 'language'-inter-
face dynamics, ~2,000 'years' ago.
Jesus wasn't "kidding".
Nor am I, as I'll enable folks to
understand, more, in another
discussion I'll post this 'night'.
[I've got to say it, else I'd be an
Egregious-Plagerist.]]
Let's see... where was I before I
diverted my 'attention' in 'moving
toward' giving-folks-encourage-
ment to do-the-Work?...
"Oh yeah"...
"deviations-from-'criticality' " being,
100%%, 'instances' of relative-TD
E/I(up) that're 'all' 'blindly'-and-auto-
matically, but, nevertheless, Rigorous-
ly, Mapped 'within' nervous systems'
STHs.
Which is =Awesome=, no?
Yup, it is.
It's Critical that anyone who wants
to understand "NDT" understand
this 'subset' of "NDT".
Which is 'Difficult' to the degree that
one can't just-See 'the' "STH" -- 'the'
Neuroanatomy.
Which leaves me 'having to' address
"deviations-from-'criticality' " being,
100%%, 'instances' of relative-TD E/I(up)
in overly-'simplified' ways.
Which's some of why I've reached-
back to discuss the "Leminiscate"-stuff
that I Reified in the mid-1970s -- before
=I= Learned the Neuroanatomy :-]
One of the Problems I'm working-on
Lifting-folks'-understandings-up with
respect to is correlated to 'Difficult'-
ies that folks experience whenever I
discuss the Either-Or-ness of 'moving'
relative to Truth.
One can either 'move toward' Truth,
or 'move away from' Truth.
There's no 'in-between' way of 'mov-
ing' relative to Truth.
Folks who remain absent-understand-
ing with respect to NDT's stuff 'pre-
sume' that I'm 'saying' that every-
thing 'is either black or white' -- 'no
shades-of-gray'.
I am saying that, in =all= 'movement',
there is either 'moving toward' Truth,
or 'moving away from' Truth.
What folks don't understand ['yet'] is
that =all= 'movement' relative to Truth
is infinitely-divisible.
Nervous systems are massively-paral-
lel, Generalized, information-processors.
Infinite Numbers of 'things' can be, and
'normally' are, 'simultaneously'-integrat-
ed 'within' routine nervous-system func-
tion.
It's the structure of the STH -- as it's
been Sufficiently-discussed in AoK, "Short
Paper", Ap2, 3, 5, and 7, with function-
al considerations discussed in the rest
of AoK -- that enables Infinite Numbers
of things to massively-integrated 'within'
"TD E/I-minimization".
In this massively-parallel-integration,
any particular infinitely-small 'thing'
can be mapped in =only= one way.
Either by achieving 'td e'i-minimiza-
tion' by 'movement' that 'move away
from', or by 'moving toward'.
Every infinitely-small 'thing'.
As such infinitely-small 'things' are
integrated, the =net= result either
'moves toward' Truth, or 'moves
away from' Truth, even though such
net-'movement' integrates both 'mov-
ing toward' and 'moving away from'
infinitely-many 'things'.
The =net= result is always either a
'moving toward' Truth or a 'moving
away from' Truth, which I reiterat-
ively-discussed, in long-former, posts,
in terms of 'movement' "upon [within]
Truth's =One= Map", which, in phys-
ical reality, is the one-way flowing
of energy, from high-density to low-
density [from order to disorder] that
is What's =Described= By 2nd Thermo
["WDB2T".]
In those long-former discussions, I
worked to convey the essence of
'moving toward' Truth through re-
course to examples in which a Pers-
on climbs the mountain that he can
see", which enables him to see the
"lay-of-the-land", surrounding, in-
cluding that the "mountain" he
climbed is not the highest-mountain
there is to climb. So, with this ob-
servation, he climbs the highest-
mountain, only to see the the high-
est mountain that he can see from
that mountain's top.
And so on, ad infinitum, the =net=
thing being that he's 'always' climb-
ing-higher.
It's the 'same' with respect to 'climb'-
ing-WDB2T, but, instead of "mount-
ains", one 'climbs' the 3D-energy-
gradients that one encounters dur-
ing the course of one's 'normal' ex-
perience, which're Rigorously-Map-
ped, in the form of relative-TD E/I,
'within' the STH of one's own nerv-
ous system.
The main Difference between the
"physical-mountain-climbing" and
3D-E cases is that, in the latter --
'within' nervous systems -- =ev-
erything= that one has ever ex-
perienced is 'simultaneously' mass-
ively-integrated 'within' the TD E/I
that occurs 'within' the STH of one's
own nervous system, each such
'thing' occurring as TD E/I that's
mapped in a way that enables TD
E/I-minimization through =either=
'moving toward' =or= 'moving
away from' the 'thing'.
What I've been uusing "Leminis-
cates" and "leminiscating" to discuss
is how and why 'movement' occours
with respect to =each= such infin-
itely-small 'thing' during the course
of TD E/I-minimization.
TD E/I-minimization with respect to
=each= such 'thing' follows a Lemin-
iscate 'path'.
1. To See this, get out a sheet of paper
and draw a 'sideways-figure-eight' --
a "Leminiscate" -- upon it.
2. Next, divide the line that you drew
into 'equal'-divisions. [Proceed by
marking at the left-right extremes of
the 'lobes', then the upper and lower
extremes of each 'lobe', then 'half'-
way between these 'division'-markers,
and so forth, until you're satisfied with
the "small"-ness of the 'divisions'.
3. As I discussed in earlier posts in
this thread, the "origin" of the Lem-
iniscate [where the figure-eight line
you've drawn "crosses"-itself -- "at
the 'X' :-]] correlates to TD E/I tend-
ing-toward Infinity -- it's a 'point' of
infinitely-unstable-'equilibrium' -- low-
'evel' TD E/I-minimization =never=
'lingers' 'there' -- which is Important
for one to understand and remember,
because it correlates =Exactly= with
the "inversion" dynamics that're dis-
cussed in AoK, Ap4, and reiteratively-
discussed in the section of AoK, Ap5
that discusses amygdalar low-'level'
supersystem-configuration dynam-
ics, which are what precipitates War,
and all War-like groupwise 'interactive'-
dynamics -- "us vs. them" stuff, like
gangs' "turf-battles" [=West Side
Story=, =Romeo and Juliet=, =Hen-
ry V=, etc., Literature-of-Art accounts]
Northern Ireland "Troubles", South
Africa "Apartheid", Rawanda Tutsi-Hutu
Genocide, Hitler's Genocide of the Jews,
Stalin's Slaughtering of Millions of his
own Citizens, early-America's Slaught-
ering of The Native Americans and
Enslavement of Africans, America's
Civil War, Osama Bin Laden's Slaught-
er of Americans on 2001-09-11, etc.,
including China's Forceful-Repression
of Tibet, as I write this.
=Throughout= the course of human
History, it's =ALL= been the =ONE=
'thing' -- low-'level' amygdalar super-
system-configuration dynamics "go-
ing-amygdalar", in a groupwise 'way',
across Populations.]
4. The "X" is the "Anchoring-'point' "
with respect to =ALL= of =ALL= nerv-
ous systems' TD E/I-minimization dyn-
amics.
5. It's with respect to the TD E/I-tend-
ing-toward-Infinity-ness that occurs 'at'
"the 'X' " that the highest-'level' super-
system-configuration dynamics that're
discussed in AoK, Ap7 ["Volition"] 'de-
cide' how and 'why' to =NON-EXPLOS-
IVELY= Direct 'movement' with respect
to =each= of the infinitely-many 'things'
that're massively-integrated 'within'
globally-integrated TD E/I-minimization,
=each= such 'thing' being 'td e/i-mini-
mized' via =either= 'moving toward'
=or= 'moving away from' 'movement'-
directionality with respect to 'it'.
6. Which happens with Elegant-Sim-
plicity, and Enormous-Information-
Processing-Power, be-cause it's all
'just' "TD E/I" -- everything, there-
fore, equally'-integratable 'within' the
=One= thing -- "TD E/I".
7. It's also with respect to the tending-
toward-Infinity-ness that occurs 'at' "the
'X' " that the low-'level' amygdalar su-
persystem-configuration dynamics make
crap-shoot 'decisions' with respect to
'movement' relative to the =net= 'in-
stantaneous' TD E/I-that's occuring
'within' a nervous system.
7. While low-'level' 'movement' relative
to "the 'X' " is =always= relatively-rapid,
high-'level' 'movement' is Calculated
'within' "Volitional" dynamics in ways
that can, and routinely do, 'linger' "at
the 'X' " -- at a cost of an overall in-
crease in the net-TD E/I that's occur-
ing 'within' a Nervous systems.
8. These are the dynamics of the "pre-
frontal force" that've been discussed
in AoK, Ap7 all along, and the 'level' of
this net-TD E/I correlates with the "vol-
itional diminishing-retruns decision"
threshold's set-'point'.
9. Returning to what I want to com-
municate with respect to "Leminis-
cates", and "leminiscating", in this post,
the two 'lobes' of the Leminiscate
you've drawn on your sheet of paper
correspond to relative 'moving toward'
and moving away from' behavioral-
directionalities.
10 It doesn't matter which you assign
to which because all 'movement' is
relative to experience, with relative-
'familiarity' that develops as a result
of one's individually-unique experience
determining how [and 'why'] one's
nervous system will Direct one's be-
havior.
11. Because of the absence-of-under-
standing with respect to how and why
nervous systems process information
via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-minimiz-
ation, which still-'prevails', to 'date',
throughout the course of human His-
tory, the assignment of 'movement'-
Directions to a Leminiscate-'lobe' has
occurred in a 'way' that's tended,
Strongly, to be 'determined' in group-
wise-coerced 'ways'.
12. This results from the 'blindly'-
automated Crap-Shooting low-'level'
supersystem-configuration dynamics
of the amygdala, and the fact that,
instead of Learning how and why
nervous systems process information
via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-mini-
mization, folks've nebulously-'learned'
the =consequences= of the low-'level'
amygdalar supersystem-configuration
'are in human nature'.
13. Which nebulous-'learning' is a Com-
pletely-False 'presumption' that, never-
theless, became instantiated 'within'
biological mass that was, itself, instan-
tiated as a result of the neural-activation
that actually occurred 'within' nervous sys-
tems that experienced the 3D-E-ramifica-
tions of nervous systems' groupwise "go-
ing amygdalar" [across Populations.]
14. Which left folks with the 'belief' that
'it is in human nature to do crazy things',
when all 'it' physically is is the still-pre-
vailing absence-of-understanding with
respect to how and why nervous systems
process information via 'blindly'-automated
TD E/I-minimization.
15. But, since this Completely-False 'be-
lief' was, in fact, instantiated 'within'
physically-real "biological mass" that
exerts physically-real inertia upon, and
'within', TD E/I-minimization, the 'blindly'-
and-automatically 'learned' 'presumption'
has tended, Strongly, to be 'blindly'-and-
automatically handed-down, intergener-
ationally, via routinely-occurring group-
wise-interactive dynamics.
16. Biological mass, exerting inertia, in
a 'way' that 'blindly'-and-automatically
self-'perpetuates' behavioral inertia by
reiteratively-reinstantiating similar bio-
logical mass across-generations of Hu-
man Beings, in a 'way' that derives
solely in the behaviors that're routinely-
occurring 'within' relatively-commonly-
interacting Populations.
17. There's Exactly-Zero Genetic 'pre-
determination' inherent.
18. "The Genome" Determines the
replication of =GENERALIZED= Proc-
essors.
19. Which is Completely-Proven in
the routinely-Observed Fact that
'normal' [stereotypically-functional]
nervous systems Learn the "Culture"
in which they Develop-to-maturity,
including instances in which Infants
are cross-Culturally Adopted 'at-Birth'.
20. This instantiation of Generalized
Processors is an Absolute Survival
Prerequisite, because, to the degree
that it 'were' otherwise, simple en-
vironmental transpositions, including,
for instance, cross-Cultural ones,
would be routinely-non-Survivable.
21. Anyway, returning [once again :-]
to discussing the Leminiscates that
you drew on your sheet of paper, what's
'symbolized' in them, are the dynamics
that cross-correlate relative-TD E/I,
'movement'-directionalities, and the
way changes in 'movement'-direc-
tionalities occur with respect to
changes in relative-TD E/I.
21a. One 'lobe' of your Leminiscate
corresponds to TD E/I-minimization
via 'moving toward', the other with
TD E/I-minimization via 'moving away
from'.
21b. Select the 'lobe' on-the-"right"
in your Leminiscate-diagram, and
[arbitrarily] associate it with TD E/I-
minimization-by-'moving toward'.
21c. TD E/I-minimization-by-'moving
toward' correlates to stuff that one
experiences as 'being pleasant' --
stuff that one 'loves'.
21d. What the curve of your Leminsicate
'traces' is the way that, as TD E/I varies,
the 'place' of the relative-TD E/I-minimiz-
ation that's correlated to any 'thing' 'moves'
with respect to the only two alternatives
that exist -- achieving TD E/I-minimization
via either 'moving toward', or 'moving
away from'.
21e. So, start at the right-most-extreme
of the right-hand 'lobe' of your Leminisc-
ate. This 'point' correlates to a 'thing'
that's experienced as being 'attractively'-
'familiar'.
21f. Proceed along 'the' up-and-left dir-
ection along your sideqays-'figure-eight'.
until you reack the maximum-"up"-'point'.
This correlates with the maximum TD
E/I(up) that can occur before one's nerv-
ous-system's TD E/I-minimization dynam-
ics begin to "invert".
21g. Proceeding to the left still further
'moves' one toward "the X", with the
Leminsicate tracing the loss-of-'pleas-
antness' with respect to 'moving to-
ward' the 'thing'-in-case [which can
be =anything= [:-] because it's all
just TD E/I as far as your nervous
system is 'concerned'.]
21h. At "the X", things "invert" -- which
is right-there to 'see' in the curvature
of your Leminiscate -- with it becoming
increasingly-'attractive' to 'move away
from' the 'thing' that was formerly 'moved
toward'.
22. Such "affective inversions" occur as
results of the degrees of relative-TD E/I
that're experienced as one 'moves' in
the 3D-E that constitute one's 'instantan-
eous'-external-experiential-environment.
23. Which ["of course"] includes the In-
finite-variabilities that're introduced by
other Life, including other People.
24. Which is 'where' the Awesome-Stuff
that's innate 'within' human nervous sys-
tems gets routinely 'double-crossed'.
25. Be-cause, one Person will 'assert'
=his= TD E/I-minimization upon -- with
'respect' to -- another Person.
26. Which 'results' in the TD E/I that's
occurring 'within' the 2nd Person's
nervous system being 'determined'
in a 'way' that's a 'cross' between
what he's come to be 'familiar' with
during the course of his previous ex-
perience, and the TD E/I that occurs
'within' his nervous system as a re-
sult of the 'movement' of the first
Person.
27. Which requires adding a second
Leminiscate, with it's TD E/I-minimiz-
ation map, which is, nevertheless,
mapped with respect to the first Lem-
iniscate 'within' overall, globally-inte-
grated TD E/I-minimization.
28. Which routinely results in the
second Leminiscate being mapped
in a way that's "inverted" with re-
spect to the first Leminiscate.
29. Be-cause the 2nd Person's be-
havior "induces" [AoK, Ap5] TD E/I(up)
'within' the first Person's nervous sys-
tem.
30. So it's easier for the first Person
to achieve TD E/I-minimization by
through the manifestation of behav-
iors that 'move away from' the 2nd
Person.
31. And so forth, with respect to ev-
erything in the Infinity-of-Infinities
that is =anyone's= 'normal' experi-
ence.
32. Each 'thing' having its correlated
Leminiscate 'within' globally-integrat-
ed TD E/I-minimization.
33. The net result being that every
'thing' is mapped 'within' a nervous
system's STH with respect to =every=
other 'thing'.
34 Be-cause all that's necessary to
'weigh' any 'thing' with respect to
any other 'thing' is to cross-correl-
ate the 'thing's 'position' on its Lem-
eniscate with the other 'thing's 'pos-
ition' on its Leminiscate.
35. Which is Simple be-cause relative-
TD E/I embodies 'position'-on-Lem-
iniscate with respect to achieving
TD E/I-minimization via 'moving to-
ward' and 'moving away from'.
36. The mapping of neural-pathways
within the STH occurs in the analogous
way.
37. The various 'areas' of 'the brain',
for instance, all exist with respect to
the overall objective of TD E/I-minimiz-
ation, =NOT= with respect to any 'dis-
crete' functionalities other than globally-
integrated TD E/I-minimization.
38. That is, any, say, "nuclear group"
exists as it does within an STH be-
cause, given =all= of the 3D-E inputs
from the external-experiential-envir-
onment, that's how the "nuclear group"
has to be mapped if globally-integrated
TD E/I-minimization is to occur 'within'
the STH.
39. =Everything= 'within' a functional-
ly-'normal' STH is mapped to instantiate
the overall, on-the-inside-looking-out-
ness that enables Consciousness with
respect to Self-with-respect-to-'move-
ment-Necessities relative to the on-
the-outside 3D-E of the nervous system's
host-organis's external-experiential-en-
vironment.
40. BE-CAUSE, Survival Depends-upon,
and Derives-in, 'moving-appropriately'
with respect to external-experiential-
environmental 3D-E.
Everything that occurs 'within' all of
such can be abstractly-mapped upon
Leminiscates, as I've done, above, in
this discussion.
What cross-correlates the Leminiscates'
abstract mappings with physically-real
Neural Topology mappings 'within' nerv-
ous systems is the the cross-correlation
of relative-TD E/I with 'movement' direc-
tionality and "affective alignments" that
can all be traced on the Leminiscate, in-
cluding everything that's been discussed
in AoK, all along.
If TD E/I(up) occurs relatively-enduring-
ly, nervous systems tend, Strongly, to
"invert" by folowing TD E/I-minimization
'paths' that literally trace Leminiscates.
Just like in the Parable of "the prodical
sone" :-]
But with respect to every 'thing' in the
Infinity-of-Infinities -- all 'at-once', de-
pending on 'instantaneous'-TD E/I, in
which "attention" is dynamically-Deter-
mined.
The "Leminiscate" works, in this way,
be-cause all Possible 'movement' Dir-
ections can be simultaneously-mapped
with respect to one another via a 3D-
'asterisk'-distribution of Leminiscates,
which simultaneously maps every 'thing'
with respect to the =one= thing -- TD
E/I-minimization, which simultaneously
maps everything, Rigorously, with respect
to WDB2T, which imbues nervous systems,
and their host-organims [we Human Beings]
with =Knowing= how, and even why, to
'climb'-WDB2T in order to maximize the
energy-densities in which we exist, which
is what, why, and how we are able to
Survive.
Understand?
[The above discussion is ["of course"]
still 'baby-talk', but all of it maps-into
the neural architecture.
Elegantly and Beautifully.
I did that mapping back during "The
Terrible Times".
It's 'Difficult' to communicate across
the experience-differentials.
But I'm trying :-]
Other matter: I was going to write
the ~"other post" that I mentioned
earlier in this post, but I'll do it 'here'.
The other 'day', when I Apologized
for posting a 'slip-shod' discussion
of "Leminsicates", I "Celebrated", a
bit, by writing, ""Good measure,
pressed down", =over-flowing=."
Here's the actual stuff that Jesus
said:
Luke 6:37 “Do not judge, and you
will not be judged; do not condemn,
and you will not be condemned.
Forgive, and you will be forgiven;
38 give, and it will be given to you.
A good measure, pressed down,
shaken together, running over, will
be put into your lap; for the measure
you give will be the measure you
get back.”
If anyone's followed the stuff I dis-
cussed, above in this post, they
should be able to See that, in the
few words, above, Jesus said every-
thing that I've reiterated, in my verb-
ose 'way', and that, once again, what
Jesus said is straight-Maths.
All-Possible-Directions, mapped-
Precisely with respect to all Pos-
sible behaviors and the way that,
'move toward' Truth, and Truth
'moves toward' one, right-back,
Not, and Not, Unfailingly.
I can imagine Leminiscates 'flying-
all-over-the-place', 'because' I say
so.
I understand :-]
So did Jesus, only, as far as I've
been able to discern, Infinitely-
moreso.
[It's in the way He used so few
words to, nevertheless, say ev-
erything that can Possibly be
said with respect to our Human
Being-ness.]
In a quiet 'moment', take a Look,
and you'll See for yourself.
You'll realize that you've never
known Beauty before whenever
it is that you will have Looked.
That's what happened to me.
All 'puffed-up' with 'my science'.
Only to experience my jaw 'hitting-
the-floor' when I Looked.
:-<>
Jesus Knew!
And I realized that I didn't know
anything, until 'then'.
Gotta say it.
With-Love.
k. p. collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
