>Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres wrote:

>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:56:33 -0400, e1313 oddalliances.org>
>> wrote:
>>

>>> Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres wrote:

>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:26:56 -0400, "Dano" yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> "Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres" home.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:48cd6ed0.29846656@news.isp.com...

>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:48:12 -0400, "Dano" yahoo.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Messiah Snobama" home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:48cbdf2c.14817578@news.datemas.de...

>>>>>>>> McCain said he wants justices to interpret the Constitution
>>>>>>>> strictly. The hideous beast, Goldburg, axt him if that means
>>>>>>>> she would become a slave again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that McCain gave some wimp-ass answer. Pussy that
>>>>>>>> he is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He should have reminded her that the Constitution has been
>>>>>>>> amended. He should have then told her that she's already a
>>>>>>>> slave on the liberals' victim plantation, in addition to being
>>>>>>>> a slave to ignorance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And just for fun, he should have told her that only in America
>>>>>>>> could something as hideous as she could become a star on TV and
>>>>>>>> in the movies.
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Whoopie has more talent in her left butt cheek than you have in
>>>>>>> your entire thimble sized brain. Bet she's way hotter than you
>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All of which is damning with faint praise I suppose.

>>>>>> One time I saw her doing a commercial to save the orangutans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She appeared in a setting that had actual orangs in the scene.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I mean, you could tell who was Goldie and who were the orangs, but
>>>>>> man, they *DO* look similar. The facial features are what I'm
>>>>>> talking about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong choice for her; she should have selected some other
>>>>>> endangered species to save.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But ya gotta give her credit for having the guts to show herself
>>>>>> to the world, being that she's not only ugly but also crude,
>>>>>> ill-mannered, boorish, and ignorant.

>>>>> You seem to share those last qualities...sure you aren't
>>>>> projecting? She also happens to be funny, talented, and has a
>>>>> good heart. Ten times the human being you appear to be. Don't
>>>>> you have some books or crosses to burn somewhere? Old ladies to
>>>>> curse out...dogs to kick...a wife to beat?

>>>>
>>>> She's a hateful black bytch. Perhaps you think that her crudeness
>>>> is funny, but she certainly has no business engaging in serious
>>>> political discussion where she can sway starry-eyed fans like
>>>> yourself. That's like a politician giving his advice on brain
>>>> surgery.
>>>>
>>>> As far as crime goes, Rastus:
>>>>
>>>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
>>>>
>>>> Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
>>>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>>>> Robbery: 6.55/1
>>>> Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
>>>> Burglary: 2.45/1
>>>>
>>>> The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
>>>> removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
>>>> extreme.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>>>> ______
>>>>
>>>> And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
>>>> poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the
>>>> robbery rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1
>>>> (Hispanics not included) based on the following poverty rates:
>>>> white: 9.9%%
>>>> black: 22.7%%
>>>> Hispanic: 21.7%%
>>>>
>>>>

>>> Its a poverty thing you moron. When the Gorbals in Scotland was as
>>> impoverished they had the same rates. All these small towns in the
>>> heartland where there is no work, no economy, exhibit the same crappy
>>> profiles. You're just a racist.
>>>

>>
>> Didn't you read what I wrote?
>>
>> I'll add to it:
>>
>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
>>
>> Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>> Robbery: 6.55/1
>> Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
>> Burglary: 2.45/1
>>
>> The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
>> removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
>> extreme.
>>
>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>> ______
>>
>> And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
>> poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the robbery
>> rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1 (Hispanics not
>> included) based on the following poverty rates:
>> white: 9.9%%
>> black: 22.7%%
>> Hispanic: 21.7%%
>>
>> http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov2.html
>>
>> 2005:
>>
>> Impoverished blacks 9,168,000
>> Impoverished total 36,950,000
>>
>> Secondly, while you may argue that a hungry group would naturally
>> commit more robberies, what's your excuse for rape, murder, assault?
>>
>> ("Dat whyte guy makes more money then me,so I think I'll rape my
>> neighbor.") Huh!!!??!
>>
>> Thirdly, the muscular thugs who are committing this savagery look
>> anything but hungry.
>>
>> Finally, in a recent study of NFL players, it was found that their
>> crime rates were only slightly less than those of their respective
>> demographic groups in the general population. ("Pros And Cons: The
>> Criminals Who Play In The NFL" by Jeff yaeger and Jeff Benedict,
>> Time-Life Books)
>>
>> Even Je$$e Jack$on was left speechless.
>>
>> It ain't fiscal bankruptcy, but moral bankruptcy, aided-and-abetted by
>> the guilty white liberal girly men who continue to make excuses and
>> keep them on a victim plantatation of self-pity, anger, and hatred.
>>

>>> You're just a racist.

>>
>> Anyone who tells the uncomfortable politically-incorrect truth today
>> is a racist.
>>
>> I prefer to call us realists.

>
>I'm sure you would prefer that. Racist fool fits perfectly however.