> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:56:33 -0400, e1313 oddalliances.org>
> wrote:
>

>> Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres wrote:

>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:26:56 -0400, "Dano" yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>

>>>> "Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres" home.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:48cd6ed0.29846656@news.isp.com...

>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:48:12 -0400, "Dano" yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> "Messiah Snobama" home.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:48cbdf2c.14817578@news.datemas.de...

>>>>>>> McCain said he wants justices to interpret the Constitution
>>>>>>> strictly. The hideous beast, Goldburg, axt him if that means
>>>>>>> she would become a slave again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that McCain gave some wimp-ass answer. Pussy that
>>>>>>> he is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He should have reminded her that the Constitution has been
>>>>>>> amended. He should have then told her that she's already a
>>>>>>> slave on the liberals' victim plantation, in addition to being
>>>>>>> a slave to ignorance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And just for fun, he should have told her that only in America
>>>>>>> could something as hideous as she could become a star on TV and
>>>>>>> in the movies.
>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Whoopie has more talent in her left butt cheek than you have in
>>>>>> your entire thimble sized brain. Bet she's way hotter than you
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of which is damning with faint praise I suppose.

>>>>> One time I saw her doing a commercial to save the orangutans.
>>>>>
>>>>> She appeared in a setting that had actual orangs in the scene.
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, you could tell who was Goldie and who were the orangs, but
>>>>> man, they *DO* look similar. The facial features are what I'm
>>>>> talking about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong choice for her; she should have selected some other
>>>>> endangered species to save.
>>>>>
>>>>> But ya gotta give her credit for having the guts to show herself
>>>>> to the world, being that she's not only ugly but also crude,
>>>>> ill-mannered, boorish, and ignorant.

>>>> You seem to share those last qualities...sure you aren't
>>>> projecting? She also happens to be funny, talented, and has a
>>>> good heart. Ten times the human being you appear to be. Don't
>>>> you have some books or crosses to burn somewhere? Old ladies to
>>>> curse out...dogs to kick...a wife to beat?

>>>
>>> She's a hateful black bytch. Perhaps you think that her crudeness
>>> is funny, but she certainly has no business engaging in serious
>>> political discussion where she can sway starry-eyed fans like
>>> yourself. That's like a politician giving his advice on brain
>>> surgery.
>>>
>>> As far as crime goes, Rastus:
>>>
>>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
>>>
>>> Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
>>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>>> Robbery: 6.55/1
>>> Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
>>> Burglary: 2.45/1
>>>
>>> The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
>>> removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
>>> extreme.
>>>
>>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>>> ______
>>>
>>> And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
>>> poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the
>>> robbery rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1
>>> (Hispanics not included) based on the following poverty rates:
>>> white: 9.9%%
>>> black: 22.7%%
>>> Hispanic: 21.7%%
>>>
>>>

>> Its a poverty thing you moron. When the Gorbals in Scotland was as
>> impoverished they had the same rates. All these small towns in the
>> heartland where there is no work, no economy, exhibit the same crappy
>> profiles. You're just a racist.
>>

>
> Didn't you read what I wrote?
>
> I'll add to it:
>
> Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
>
> Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
> Robbery: 6.55/1
> Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
> Burglary: 2.45/1
>
> The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
> removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
> extreme.
>
> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
> ______
>
> And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
> poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the robbery
> rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1 (Hispanics not
> included) based on the following poverty rates:
> white: 9.9%%
> black: 22.7%%
> Hispanic: 21.7%%
>
> http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov2.html
>
> 2005:
>
> Impoverished blacks 9,168,000
> Impoverished total 36,950,000
>
> Secondly, while you may argue that a hungry group would naturally
> commit more robberies, what's your excuse for rape, murder, assault?
>
> ("Dat whyte guy makes more money then me,so I think I'll rape my
> neighbor.") Huh!!!??!
>
> Thirdly, the muscular thugs who are committing this savagery look
> anything but hungry.
>
> Finally, in a recent study of NFL players, it was found that their
> crime rates were only slightly less than those of their respective
> demographic groups in the general population. ("Pros And Cons: The
> Criminals Who Play In The NFL" by Jeff yaeger and Jeff Benedict,
> Time-Life Books)
>
> Even Je$$e Jack$on was left speechless.
>
> It ain't fiscal bankruptcy, but moral bankruptcy, aided-and-abetted by
> the guilty white liberal girly men who continue to make excuses and
> keep them on a victim plantatation of self-pity, anger, and hatred.
>

>> You're just a racist.

>
> Anyone who tells the uncomfortable politically-incorrect truth today
> is a racist.
>
> I prefer to call us realists.