On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:56:33 -0400, e1313
oddalliances.org>
wrote:
>Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:26:56 -0400, "Dano"
yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> "Barack's Bomber, Bill Ayres"
home.org> wrote in message
>>> news:48cd6ed0.29846656@news.isp.com...>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:48:12 -0400, "Dano"
yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Messiah Snobama"
home.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:48cbdf2c.14817578@news.datemas.de...>>>>>> McCain said he wants justices to interpret the Constitution strictly.
>>>>>> The hideous beast, Goldburg, axt him if that means she would become a
>>>>>> slave again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand that McCain gave some wimp-ass answer. Pussy that he is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He should have reminded her that the Constitution has been amended.
>>>>>> He should have then told her that she's already a slave on the
>>>>>> liberals' victim plantation, in addition to being a slave to
>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And just for fun, he should have told her that only in America could
>>>>>> something as hideous as she could become a star on TV and in the
>>>>>> movies.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Whoopie has more talent in her left butt cheek than you have in your
>>> entire
>>>>> thimble sized brain. Bet she's way hotter than you too.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of which is damning with faint praise I suppose.
>>>> One time I saw her doing a commercial to save the orangutans.
>>>>
>>>> She appeared in a setting that had actual orangs in the scene.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, you could tell who was Goldie and who were the orangs, but
>>>> man, they *DO* look similar. The facial features are what I'm talking
>>>> about.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong choice for her; she should have selected some other endangered
>>>> species to save.
>>>>
>>>> But ya gotta give her credit for having the guts to show herself to
>>>> the world, being that she's not only ugly but also crude,
>>>> ill-mannered, boorish, and ignorant.
>>> You seem to share those last qualities...sure you aren't projecting? She
>>> also happens to be funny, talented, and has a good heart. Ten times the
>>> human being you appear to be. Don't you have some books or crosses to burn
>>> somewhere? Old ladies to curse out...dogs to kick...a wife to beat?
>>
>> She's a hateful black bytch. Perhaps you think that her crudeness is
>> funny, but she certainly has no business engaging in serious political
>> discussion where she can sway starry-eyed fans like yourself. That's
>> like a politician giving his advice on brain surgery.
>>
>> As far as crime goes, Rastus:
>>
>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
>>
>> Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>> Robbery: 6.55/1
>> Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
>> Burglary: 2.45/1
>>
>> The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
>> removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
>> extreme.
>>
>>
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>> ______
>>
>> And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
>> poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the robbery
>> rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1 (Hispanics not
>> included) based on the following poverty rates:
>> white: 9.9%%
>> black: 22.7%%
>> Hispanic: 21.7%%
>>
>>
>Its a poverty thing you moron. When the Gorbals in Scotland was as
>impoverished they had the same rates. All these small towns in the
>heartland where there is no work, no economy, exhibit the same crappy
>profiles. You're just a racist.
>
Didn't you read what I wrote?
I'll add to it:
Black/White Street Crime Ratios, adjusted for demographics:
Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1
The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
______
And for you to blame crime on socioeconomics, please note that the
poverty rate in a recent year does not correlate well with the robbery
rates. The black/white poverty ratio (2001) was 2.3/1 (Hispanics not
included) based on the following poverty rates:
white: 9.9%%
black: 22.7%%
Hispanic: 21.7%%
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov2.html
2005:
Impoverished blacks 9,168,000
Impoverished total 36,950,000
Secondly, while you may argue that a hungry group would naturally
commit more robberies, what's your excuse for rape, murder, assault?
("Dat whyte guy makes more money then me,so I think I'll rape my
neighbor.") Huh!!!??!
Thirdly, the muscular thugs who are committing this savagery look
anything but hungry.
Finally, in a recent study of NFL players, it was found that their
crime rates were only slightly less than those of their respective
demographic groups in the general population. ("Pros And Cons: The
Criminals Who Play In The NFL" by Jeff yaeger and Jeff Benedict,
Time-Life Books)
Even Je$$e Jack$on was left speechless.
It ain't fiscal bankruptcy, but moral bankruptcy, aided-and-abetted by
the guilty white liberal girly men who continue to make excuses and
keep them on a victim plantatation of self-pity, anger, and hatred.
> You're just a racist.
Anyone who tells the uncomfortable politically-incorrect truth today
is a racist.
I prefer to call us realists.
