> On Mar 31, 9:57 pm, Lars Eighner
larseighner.com> wrote:>> In our last episode,
>> <1175392046.038651.24...@
e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>> the lovely and talented Mr. Bag
>> broadcast on alt.politics:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 31, 6:57 pm, "Stephen Cowell"
sbcglobal.net> wrote:>>>> "Mr. Bag"
aol.com> wrote in message>>
>>
>>>>> On Mar 31, 11:49 am, "Stephen Cowell"
sbcglobal.net> wrote:>>>>>> "Mr. Bag"
aol.com> wrote in message>>
>>
>>>>>> ...
>>
>>>>>>> Want to stop tax cheating? Support
>>>>>>>
http://www.fairfax.org/site/PageServer.
>>>>>>> You pay at the counter. You buy more, you pay more, you buy less, you
>>>>>>> pay less simple as that. No gov't favortism in applying deductions
>>>>>>> for this and penalties for that, you want something you pay. The
>>>>>>> Mexican wants something he pays. The employer wants something he
>>>>>>> pays. Someone reaping the huge tax free rewards in our current black
>>>>>>> market economy wants something, they pay. No need to put the burden
>>>>>>> of investigation on employers. Take back the power to control your
>>>>>>> own destiny people and ensure everyone pays their fair share.
>>
>>>>>> The fair share ain't flat... and you know it.
>>
>>>>> I never claimed it was.
>>
>>>> You're proposing a flat tax.
>>> No. A flat tax is a value at which all INCOME is taxed. The fair tax
>>> is based on CONSUMPTION not INCOME.
>>
>> Just another tax break for the rich, soak the poor Republican wet dream.
> Only if the rich to consume less.
No.
