an interview with David Duke
KAS: What was the reaction of the high-level people in Syria to your
visit?
David Duke: Extremely Positive. One of the most amazing aspects of
my visit was the reaction of the press. I'm used to an adversarial
press, of course, pretty much because of the influence of the Jewish
supremacists. In Syria I held a large press conference in a big
press tent in the middle of Damascus. There were probably a hundred
news people there from all over the Middle East, including about
twenty from the major national news media of the respective
countries. And this press conference was broadcast live in these
different countries. I got to explain about Jewish supremacism,
Jewish control of the American media, the attack on the U.S.S.
Liberty, and about how Israel actually made a terrorist attack
against America in the Lavon affair, which a lot of these people
aren't aware of.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5228 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4783 ]
So, I said, America's been a victim of both Jewish terrorism and
Jewish occupation in many of the ways that they have, and they got
to hear about this. They also got to see and hear an American who
doesn't go along with Jewish supremacism. The Syrian Press
Association-which is the official press association for that
country and it has associates all over the Middle East-came out
with an article in which they said that David Duke is the best
ambassador from the American people ever to come to Syria and the
Mideast because he has made us realize that not all Americans
support the policies of Wolfowitz, Perle, and Bush. He has shown us
that not all Americans support the Zionist terror in Israel and that
there are many Americans who support us. They may not be a majority,
but they're being manipulated, just as the Zionists try to
manipulate us here.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5460 ]
That was interesting to me because I didn't count on the media being
so supportive. Again, I'm used to hostile media. The representatives
of the Middle Eastern media interviewed me for an hour and a half,
and there was not one negative question. There was no mention of my
KKK involvement of thirty years ago-just a discussion of the
critical issues at hand, and it was very positive all the way
through the interview.
KAS: In addition to Syria, I know that you've engaged in outreach to
other Middle Eastern countries in the past. I find it interesting
that you, a man who is characterized as a hater of non-Whites, were
speaking in a friendly way to non-White peoples and receiving an
excellent reception from them in their countries-although you
have expressed an opposition to Islamic and Middle Eastern
immigration to Europe, the United States, and other White areas. Did
they address that issue at all, and if so, how do they feel about
that?
DD: Let me tell you an interesting fact; this is something that's
important that all of your listeners hear. Every time I've gone to
the Middle East and done public appearances I've make one thing
clear. I've made sure there's no stone left unturned because Israel
has started a hate campaign against me, telling the Arabs, "Well,
David Duke is against all the non-White, non-European people, so you
should not welcome him; instead you should spit upon him."
One of the first things I tell these people is, "I want to make
something very clear at the outset. I am a person of European
descent and I live in the United States of America. I want to
preserve the ancestral homelands of my people for my people-both
Europe and America. I want to preserve our traditions and our ethnic
heritage and I'm opposed to any non-European immigration to our
countries-just as I know you would be opposed to Europeans coming
en masse to your countries, controlling your societies, and trying
to change your religious values, traditions, or culture. So, I want
to let you know that that's what I stand for. At the same time, I am
not in favor of America or any other European country opening up
bases all over the world, oppressing your people, or supporting
Israel. We are allies in a sense, in that we both have a common
problem in the extreme danger posed by Jewish supremacism and by the
extremists who control Israel and have so much influence in the
Western world. They are a threat to you and also to us in much the
same way, and we should stand united in our opposition to them.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3663 ]
KAS: Well let's hope that there can be good will between different
peoples who want self-determination and feel no hostility toward
others who want the same thing.
DD: Well I think that there is such good will, and I certainly saw
it during my trip. The media in Damascus broadcast my interview and
my speech, which anybody can view on my Web site, davidduke.com.
That speech was aired on every news channel in Syria and just about
every Syrian saw it. After the broadcast, whenever I would walk in
the streets-of course, I'm pretty recognizable over there; I'm
tall and very European in appearance-everywhere I went people
would cheer for me and welcome me; it was amazing. So there is good
will now, and I hope that we can preserve it.
[ http://www.davidduke.com/ ]
There's a difference between a truly supremacist vision of life,
such as the Jews have, and what we want. We're not trying to hurt
other peoples or oppress them, and this message also helps our own
people to see the truth. When you talk to many White people about
preserving our heritage, our values, and our rights, and about
having their children grow up in a White society, they can go along
with that. They don't go along with the idea of murdering or
oppressing or exterminating other people, which, of course, is what
the Jewish media try to portray our movement as being all about.
That's why when our people act like the Hollywood stereotypes they
do a tremendous amount of damage to our cause. But when White people
see an individual who is active for White rights also befriending
people in the Middle East in a diplomatic sort of way, it basically
destroys the image that the Jewish media try to create of a "hater,"
or a "bigot"-of somebody who hates others. They realize that I am
a person just like themselves, and that the people of our cause are
decent individuals who are trying to preserve our heritage, but are
not trying to hurt other peoples.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5010 ]
KAS: I know that the reaction of the Jewish-controlled media here in
the West to your Syrian trip was very hostile-and they tried to
make it look like you were making anti-American speeches there.
DD: Right. In fact, I remember seeing that on CNN with Wolf Blitzer.
Wolf Blitzer-now here's a guy who's supposed to be an unbiased
newsman. He's actually a former activist for AIPAC, the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee-a group that is under
investigation right now for spying on the United States of America.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7091 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8084 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8085 ]
KAS: And one of the number one pro-war groups in this country.
DD: Exactly. And this is a guy who tells us about the Middle East
and tells us "David Duke blasts the U.S."? I didn't blast the U.S.
I blasted the Jewish supremacists who have subverted and hijacked
American foreign policy and led us to this disaster in the Middle
East, and I blasted the individual whom I believe has practically
committed treason against this country, George Bush.
When you send American boys into battle, you risk their lives and
they face losing their arms, their legs, their vision, and even
their ability to reproduce. When you send them into battle, you
don't send them to fight for a lie, and you don't send them to fight
for some other country's interests. You send them in only if America
and its well-being are truly threatened. And, of course, we've
learned that the reasons given for this war have been a lie. So I
see it as a great betrayal to send Americans into this war, which is
a war for Israel, rather than for American interests.
KAS: The Jewish "powers that be" have also tried to make some moves
against the university in Ukraine from which you recently earned
your doctorate. Can you tell us about that?
DD: Well, yes, that's true, and this is the first time I've talked
to your listeners since that happened. I've been quietly working
toward my doctoral degree for a long time. I made sure that every
"i" was dotted and every "t" was crossed in my studies at the
university. I took the required exams, did everything I had to do,
and defended my doctoral thesis-which had to do with the ethnic
supremacist aspect of Zionism-in the proper way before fifteen
academicians at the university. They were fifteen of the top
academicians not only at that school, but also in all of eastern
Europe. All of them were well educated and have been widely
published, not only in the academic community, but also in the
larger commercial market. And of course, I was awarded a doctorate.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=6035 ]
The Jewish extremists are pretty upset about that. They had to admit
that everything was done properly, but they still said I should be
in prison robes rather than doctoral robes, and they said the same
thing about the president of the university, Dr. Tchokin. In fact,
Israel has demanded that Dr. Tchokin not be allowed to run for
office in Ukraine. He started a new party there called the
Conservative Party. He's a very anti-Zionist voice, a very
pro-Ukrainian, nationalistic voice, and they demanded that he not be
allowed to run for office.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4669 ]
That's chutzpah, when a foreign country tells you that you can't
have democratic freedoms or rights in elections. Since that time
they have also have demanded that the university be shut down, and
that all of its degrees be revoked. Well, it's kind of hard to shut
down the university; it's the largest university in Ukraine. They
have about fifty thousand students there and a beautiful, sprawling
campus with fantastic buildings on a hill in the middle of Kiev.
More people in the Ukrainian government, more members of the
Ukrainian diplomatic corps, more of the people in their bureaucracy,
their scientific community, and the other professions in Ukraine
have been educated at this university than at any other university
in the country. All of a sudden, here are these extremist Jews
saying, "Revoke the degrees of all the students." That would mean
revoking literally hundreds of thousands of degrees that have been
earned by the leading citizens of the country. But that's how evil
and oppressive these extremists are.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=6036 ]
KAS: I understand that the university has held conferences on the
subject of Zionism. I have an article in front of me that says, "The
courageous university leadership"-it's called MAUP, which is a
Ukrainian acronym for Interregional Academy for Personnel Management
-- "said the United Nations should revoke its 1947 resolution on the
creation of a Jewish state. 'Mankind lived without the state of
Israel exactly 2,670 years, but after the second of its creation,
all the world feels a constant aggression,' they declared." So there
definitely is some conflict between the university and Zionist power
in the world.
DD: That statement was made in response to their efforts to shut
down the university and deny its President his rights. And, by the
way, my argument is not by any means for extermination of the Jewish
people. What I have said is simply that the Jewish people in Israel
can live as the other Jewish communities have historically lived
without bothering, oppressing, or imprisoning members of the Arab
community. I have no problem with Jews being in Israel; obviously
they have historically resided there. But I do have a problem with
them having created a state through terrorism, with their
terrorization of the Palestinian population, and with their jailing
and torturing of people by the tens of thousands over the years, and
with their fomenting of problems in other countries.
For instance, I truly believe that the Shi'ite-Sunni civil war now
looming in Iraq is the work of the Mossad. Only the Mossad would
bomb some of the holiest sites of Islam, and of course, the Israelis
seek this war. They destroyed the government of Saddam Hussein, but
in its place they now see something that they are beginning to view
as a big threat: a Shi'ite government that is very pro-Iran and a
refurbished, rebuilt Iraq, re-armed by America. They don't want this.
They want Iraq to be destabilized through civil war, so now they're
now trying to foment one. Now, before people begin saying, "David
Duke is loony again" or "He's just extreme. How can that be?," they
should remember that we know for a fact that Israel did precisely
the same thing in Lebanon. Moshe Sharett, the former Israeli Prime
Minister, talked about this. Israel purposely promoted bloodshed and
violence between the Christians and the Muslims in Lebanon in order
to foment civil war there. The reason why they hate Syria so much is
because Syrian forces came in-they were invited, by the way, by
the Lebanese government-and stopped the bloodshed among these
Lebanese people that had lived side-by-side for centuries. By the
way, although Syria is overwhelmingly Muslim, approximately four
million Christians, mostly of Greek descent-almost pure Greek
descent-also live there, and they and the Muslim population have
co-existed for centuries. Well, obviously it's in the interests of
the Jewish state to use the same old divide-and-conquer technique
that Stephen Steinlight has talked about. The Israelis want to see
their enemies fight each other, and I think that's what's why we see
what's going on in Iraq right now.
KAS: Did you not run an article on your website theorizing that
there was a Jewish element behind this Mohammed cartoon controversy
that began in Denmark and resulted in riots all around the world?
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8097 ]
DD: According to Wikipedia and other sources, Fleming Rose, the
person that launched the cartoon controversy is himself of direct
Ukrainian Jewish descent. We know for a fact that he is a very close
associate of Daniel Pipes, ones of the leading and most extreme
Jewish neo-cons, as pro-Israel and as supremacist as you could
possibly imagine. Rose stayed in Pipes' home in the United States of
America.
This affair is one more example of what they try to do, and it's
also what they're doing right now in our country. I think Israel
benefited a great deal from the 9-11 attacks, and I think that in
the long run, Israel wants these attacks. They want to escalate this
international conflict, they want World War IV.
And in the process, what does that do? Well, it again takes our
attention away from the vital domestic racial issues confronting us
in our country. It also gives them an opportunity to take away our
freedoms, because we find ourselves in a wartime public speech
scenario. So you see continued destruction of our basic
constitutional rights and liberties. Our Bill of Rights is falling
by the wayside a little more every day, and these international wars
that they're trying to foment are simply a disaster for us. We saw
the same thing in the Second World War. They got us into that war
through the back door, so to speak. For years they promoted war and
they tried to provoke a Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in every way
they could. Our government engaged in many warlike acts against
Japan for the purpose of provoking this attack.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7110 ]
KAS: Well, if 9-11 was the Pearl Harbor of the Iraq war, do you
believe they will need another incident-another "Pearl Harbor"-
to bring on a war with Iran, which the neo-cons and the Zionists
clearly want?
DD: I don't know if they need an incident as big as 9-11, but they
do need continued pressure. They need for there to be more terrorist
acts in the West. I don't know if they themselves have to engage in
direct infiltration to promote these things or not, but I wouldn't
put anything past them.
They've done false flag operations before; it's a fact of history.
There's no denying the fact that Israel literally sent Jewish Mossad
agents to Egypt to blow up American installations, American movie
theaters, American restaurants, and American libraries. Luckily the
plot was thwarted because one of the bombs in a Jewish terrorist's
pocket blew up prematurely. So he was caught and made to talk, the
whole plot unraveled, and eventually the Israeli Defense Minister
Pinhas Lavon, had to resign. In that instance they tried to use
terrorism against America to get our country into a war against
another country-Egypt-that was innocent of any action against us.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5415 ]
If they had been successful, their scheme would have cost tens of
thousands of American lives and countless billions of dollars, and
would have caused the terrible injustice of war with a country that
had done nothing to harm us. And as you know, just recently, the
Israeli prime minister literally gave medals to-and praised as
heroes-these same Jewish terrorists who attacked the United
States of America, and yet there was almost no coverage of this
event in America's controlled media, and there was no outrage in the
United States Congress.
KAS: Virtually the only coverage came from the pro-White alternative
media. David, can you share with us your insight on the likelihood
of war with Iran? What insights do your Middle Eastern contacts give
you into the mind-set of the Iranians? What is Ahmadinejad looking
for and where is he going?
DD: I think Ahmadinejad is one of the most courageous, honest
overseas leaders, and I think he's smart enough to realize that
there's going to be a lot of problems for them, as well as for us,
unless Jewish extremist power in Europe and America is broken.
I did a lot of programs in the Middle East back in late October and
early November and I discussed how the Holocaust is being used as a
weapon. Of course, it was the primary weapon in the creation of
Israel and in the suppression of the Palestinian people, and there
are many revisionists who have legitimate questions about this
period of history. The Arab states and the Islamic world did well to
start challenging some of its claims. I talked about this to Nidal
Kabalan, who is Syria's leading journalist, and he later spoke with
the President of Iran. I think this may have something to do with
the statements that Ahmadinejad made just a few weeks later,
questioning different aspects of the Holocaust.
KAS: What do you think is the likelihood of war with Iran?
DD: Obviously the likelihood is high. The question is, how crazy are
these Jewish neo-cons? I think if they do launch an attack on Iran,
they'd much prefer it come from the United States rather than from
Israel, because they want to deflect their enemies from their own
country.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7739 ]
The Iraq war, after all, deflected a lot of bombers and terrorist
targets from Israel to America. If the crazies succeed, I think it
will be disastrous, ultimately, for international Zionism. Even if
we don't invade Iran, but instead bomb their nuclear sites, for
example, the Iranians will consider that an act of all-out war. They
have a very dedicated population three times as large as Iraq's.
They've already had 250,000 people sign up to be suicide bombers,
and these people are at the ready in a suicide brigade. Iran will
send its agents all over the Middle East and all over the world to
attack Americans. They not going to just sit back and take it.
This would be a disaster, and it would also disrupt the flow of oil.
We would very likely have $200-per-barrel oil, which would probably
lead to terrible economic depression in Europe and America. It would
probably bring on the most severe worldwide depression since the
1930s.
KAS: It seems crazy for people who are at the pinnacle of power-
that is, the Jewish supremacists right now in the West-to want to
shake things up so badly, just to protect their little Zionist
colony in Israel.
DD: Well, they're between a rock and a hard place, that's their
problem. They don't want Iran to eventually acquire nuclear weapons
and be on a par with Israel, but at the same time if they launch
this war it's going to result in disaster in all the countries of
the world, and that may cause them to lose their grip on the world.
So they have a very tough decision to make.
If the crazies prevail, I think it's going to be disastrous for the
United States and disastrous for the world. However, if the cooler
heads among the Zionists prevail, they'll try to use other means-
like subversion-to take care of the problem. They may try to
cause a civil war in Iran, or foment a coup d'état there. They're
very good at that kind of thing, you know. They've been practicing
and working at it for years and I'm sure that they have people
planted in the government of Iran and in many other governments as
well; this is their forte. In that case, we won't have war; and
since the Jews have tended to learn from history, at this point I
think that the cooler heads will prevail. There's just too much risk
for them in the other scenario.
KAS: Well, whatever the case, we must continue to work to educate
our people and to work for our own self-determination. Along those
same lines, you and I were in Washington, D.C. earlier this week at
the National Archives and we stood with our hands literally within a
couple of inches of the founding document of the United States, the
Constitution. What were your thoughts on that occasion?
DD: Well, I've seen them before, and I've been that close to them
before, but every time in my life that I've seen them they've made a
deep impression on me.
Our Founding Fathers were such brilliant men, and they were also
courageous men. They stood up against the strongest power in the
world at the time. They stood on principle, and they sacrificed.
Most who participated in the American Revolution died paupers.
It amazes me that the same issues exist today, except that they are
perhaps even more serious. For instance, our country was founded on
the principle of independence, on the idea that as a nation and a
culture we have a right to a government dedicated to "ourselves and
to our posterity." We have a right to our independence, to be free
of control by any foreign people. The people of the United States
then, of course, had been controlled by the British, who are
basically our people. Most of the American people then were of
British descent. But we still felt that we had our own life here in
America, we had the right to run our own affairs and to have those
affairs determined by what's good for our people here.
Of course, today we have a situation in which a foreign nation that
is absolutely opposed to the fundamental precepts of what America is
all about, to what our forefathers believed in, and to our values,
is in control of our mass media and in control of many aspects of
our government-certainly of our foreign policy. That makes it
contemporary for me.
And the principles of our Declaration of Independence apply to other
nations as well. They apply to the Iraqis, who have a right to their
independence under Saddam Hussein or whomever else they may choose
as their leaders. They apply to Iran and to Syria, to Israel, and to
any other country. For us to try to make things otherwise is a
terrible mistake; it gets us involved in these foreign conflicts.
Secondly, seeing these documents and the Constitution of the United
States again, I'm reminded of the founding of our country and how
much it's been subverted since those days. As we all know, the
Preamble to the Constitution of the United States says very clearly
that these principles are for "ourselves and our posterity." That's
our posterity. These men were talking about their own posterity. And
of course, whether or not our posterity will survive is in question.
We're being ethnically cleansed in our own country. Through the
differential birthrate, racial mixing, and massive immigration we
are literally becoming fewer and fewer in number and eventually
we'll be completely under the control-political, social,
economic, and cultural-of people who are not of our kind.
I also looked at the Bill of Rights while we were there, and
remembered that one of the very first laws that the framers of our
Constitution wrote limited immigration to the United States to
people of European heritage. So we know what this country was
founded on, and even though the media always call people like you
and me "un-American," we know that we are the authentic Americans.
One final thing I thought of when I considered how our country has
been subverted again, were the remarks that Mr. Neal Gabler made in
a documentary about Jewish media control (I quote him in my book
Jewish Supremacism). In that documentary he said, in approximately
these words, that the eastern European Jews who came to America-
people who were not allowed in many precincts of the old America-
literally changed America through control of our media-changed it
to their point of view, to their values, and to their issues.
He's Jewish himself, and his own words were "they devoured the old
America." In its place they created a new America of their own
design, in which they were the leaders; and he said that the Jews
subverted the values of this country in many of whose precincts they
formerly hadn't even been allowed.
Well, in my group, EURO, and in your group, National Vanguard, we
have a task. In our Web sites and our writings, and in our work, we
have an absolutely vital task ahead of us. We must get back control
over our own country, over our culture, our press, our media, and
truthfully, over our very hearts and souls.
Each of us has an individual battle in that way because all of us
are touched and affected by this virus that is among us-this
destructive, negative culture that the Jews have dumped upon us. We
must struggle to regain control of our lives, our heritage, and
eventually our country and our media, and unless we do this, unless
we have the courage and we acquire the ability and the knowledge to
regain control, unless we have the passion and the love that it's
going to take-it takes great love to make great sacrifices-we
will be lost forever and all the tears and dreams of our forefathers
will have been in vain. That's our task. I am committed, I am
dedicated to that task, and I believe that you are too.
KAS: Well, David, on the façade of the National Archives building,
which is a beautiful, almost Olympian structure in federal
Washington, are graven some words which I will quote, "The Heritage
of the Past is the Seed that Brings Forth the Harvest of the
Future." I want to thank you for working for the preservation and
the advancement of that precious heritage over these many years and
I want to thank you for your work as an ambassador for peace from
our people to the other peoples of the world. I look forward to your
work this year and in the decades to come, and I also want to thank
you for being a guest again on American Dissident Voices.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/