|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Pahu78Pahu78 Date: Mar 6, 2008 18:39
Connected Galaxies
Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or
quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often
for all examples to be coincidences (a). If redshifts imply
velocities, these galaxies and quasars haven't been moving apart for
very long. If redshifts do not always imply velocities, many
astronomical conclusions are in error.
a. Arp, Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies.
Fred Hoyle and Jayant V. Narlikar, "On the Nature of Mass," Nature,
Vol. 233, 3 September 1971, pp. 41-44.
William Kaufmann III, "The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth," Science
Digest, July 1981, pp. 76-81, 117.
Geoffrey Burbidge, "Redshift Rift," Science 81, December 1981, p. 18.
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
|
| | 35 Comments |
|
|
Date: Mar 6, 2008 19:22
> Science Disproves Evolution
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: _ Prof. Jonez __ Prof. Jonez _ Date: Mar 6, 2008 21:57
> Connected Galaxies
>
> Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or
> quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often
> for all examples to be coincidences (a). If redshifts imply
> velocities, these galaxies and quasars haven't been moving apart for
> very long. If redshifts do not always imply velocities, many
> astronomical conclusions are in error.
>
> a. Arp, Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies.
>
> Fred Hoyle and Jayant V. Narlikar, "On the Nature of Mass," Nature,
> Vol. 233, 3 September 1971, pp. 41-44.
>
> William Kaufmann III, "The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth," Science
> Digest, July 1981, pp. 76-81, 117.
>
> Geoffrey Burbidge, "Redshift Rift," Science 81, December 1981, p. 18.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Mar 6, 2008 22:22
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:57:21 -0700, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
jonez.net> wrote:>> Connected Galaxies
>>
>> Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or
>> quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often
>> for all examples to be coincidences (a). If redshifts imply
>> velocities, these galaxies and quasars haven't been moving apart for
>> very long. If redshifts do not always imply velocities, many
>> astronomical conclusions are in error.
>>
>> a. Arp, Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies.
>>
>> Fred Hoyle and Jayant V. Narlikar, "On the Nature of Mass," Nature,
>> Vol. 233, 3 September 1971, pp. 41-44.
>>
>> William Kaufmann III, "The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth," Science
>> Digest, July 1981, pp. 76-81, 117.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dubh GhallDubh Ghall Date: Mar 7, 2008 02:02
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:22:25 -0800, john w @yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>> Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
>>> system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.
>>>
>>> http://www.creationscience.com/ >>
>>You fucking idiot.
>>
>
> ^ ^ ^ ^ That was intelligent!
It was accurate
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: walksalonewalksalone Date: Mar 7, 2008 03:46
john w @yahoo.com> news:don1t31epr4f6ogn03c2cvdcns378i3a64@
4ax.com
Not content with having established, he does not know the difference
between peeing on his shoes and standing in his piss, elected to verify
beyond a reasonable doubt that, yes it is factual, he has nothing to say &
a strong burning desire to say it publicly. Of course, penicillin might
take care of that burning.
AVR training session, no proofreading for Jon Jon
|
| Show full article (2.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ken SmithKen Smith Date: Mar 12, 2008 16:11
>Connected Galaxies
>Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or
>quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often
>for all examples to be coincidences (a). If redshifts imply
>velocities, these galaxies and quasars haven't been moving apart for
>very long. If redshifts do not always imply velocities, many
>astronomical conclusions are in error.
>a. Arp, Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies.
>Fred Hoyle and Jayant V. Narlikar, "On the Nature of Mass," Nature,
>Vol. 233, 3 September 1971, pp. 41-44.
>William Kaufmann III, "The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth," Science
>Digest, July 1981, pp. 76-81, 117.
>Geoffrey Burbidge, "Redshift Rift," Science 81, December 1981, p. 18.
|
| Show full article (1.54Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JamesJames Date: Mar 24, 2008 07:49
>"MEHSC MOBERATOR"
>Re: Science Disproves Evolution
>> Science Disproves Evolution
>Pigs might fly!
>
>
>--
Hello,
Although the main subject matter of Pahu concerned a 'young universe'
teaching, the Bible DOES NOT teach of such a thing. The Bible has no
problem with an 'old' universe and earth. (see my reply to the poster,
or just send me an email if you want the information)
If science does indeed disprove evolution, then you need to pick the
feathers out of your next hot dog:)
Actually, the fossil record supports the creation account, over the
evolutionary theory. For example, Even many years ago, biochemist
D. B. Gower said in England’s Kentish Times:
|
| Show full article (2.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JamesJames Date: Mar 24, 2008 07:49
>Re: Science Disproves Evolution
>Connected Galaxies
>
>Galaxies frequently appear connected or aligned with other galaxies or
>quasars that have vastly different redshifts. This happens too often
>for all examples to be coincidences...
|
| Show full article (4.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Paul HandsPaul Hands Date: Mar 24, 2008 07:50
Horseshit.
Evolution is built on the scientific method.
The bible is toilet paper : bets kept in the toilet.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
