Hunter01 wrote:
Lets set the scene for what follows so we can see Hunters
idea of 'rational debate' and his claims that he
a) "CAN hold a civilized debate with sane people without
> degenerating into childish crap" and
b) "people like me just mirror the attitude we're given,
Hampster apparently got back from a binge and far from
'holding a debate' in any of the threads he complains of
vented his spleen in a thread of PURE AD HOM ABUSE in
a thread entitled "fagsnads/che, the sound of his own voice award!"
His rant started with this opening line and carried on with the same
irrational abuse for the entire post:
"Fucking hell, take a little while out and come back and
all you see is a truckload of one post threads with che
talking to... well no-one, no-one reads them, no-one answers
them, no-one's interested! "
So claim a) is looking like COMPLETE BULLSHIT, eh, Hampster..
you just pretend to be on a high horse, but you are really
a guttersnipe.
And if you were genuine about 'mirroring the attitude we're given'
you would have IGNORED the threads you claim were ignored!
Instead here you are, in my thread of substance, where OTHERS
are making rational responses, (demonstrating that your claims
are bullshit), and your WHINING EMPTY ABUSE was IGNORED
by me until you dragged the SAME abusive crap into THIS
thread! Are you trying to get a date? B^D
I'm not the one who reacts to being 'ignored'.. you are.
I'm clearly not ignored, especially by you! as this thread shows!
You however were ignored, especially by me... and you don't like it!
So here you are.. demanding my attention and whining like a
little bitch!
And guess what.. I am "just mirroring the attitude I'm given"
Go have a widdle Cry! B^)
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> Swampfox wrote:
>>>> Polly the Parrot wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2008 18:10:31 +1000 "Swampfox"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nelson is leader because the idealogues still hold sway in the
>>>>>> federal parliamentary Liberal Party, and as recently as last week
>>>>>> he was heard to say that Howard and Workchoices was right, and the
>>>>>> Australian electorate wrong.
>>>>> Really? Who heard him say that?
Ignoring the issue, Hampster goes for the cheap ad-hom snipe:
>>>> Che regularly twists the truth to try to further his own agenda.
>>>> Honesty is not something he could ever be accused of.
He is instantly bitch-slapped down, as usual:
>>> "The courage of John Howard and Peter Reith on the waterfront in 1997
>>> and 1998, which means that we as Australians are able to more afford
>>> the goods that we buy that come across those wharves and our
>>> exporters can be more confident in what they will receive throughout
>>> the rest of the world from that which we export.
>>> The changes to workplace relations in 1996 and 1997 which for 10
>>> years created almost two million jobs for Australians."
>>>
>>> "Through reforms to workplace relations, we have made it easier for
>>> employers and employees to step outside a combative union versus
>>> employer dichotomy and a one size fits all award system, to negotiate
>>> the arrangements that best suit them."
>>> - Brendon Nelson
>>>
>>> Sounds like a ringing endorsement of Workchoices to me.
>>> How do you read it Confucius?
Job done! Hampsters cheap shot now just makes HIM look cheap.
B^D I simply ""just mirrored the attitude I was given"
Look closely, this is a copy of HIS text below, with the
name changed to reflect the latest arse kicking his credibility
just received;
>> "Hunter regularly twists the truth to try to further his
>> own agenda. Honesty is not something he could ever
>> be accused of." B^)
>>
>> Here he is, once again in one of my threads,
>> unable to contribute anything sensible
Case proven! B^D
Game Set Match!
And now that I have RESPONDED to *HIS* EMPTY ABUSE,
in kind.. he will whine at great length about how mean i am
to him.. how i ignore him and don't give him the
attention he needs!
ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A PERMANENT RELATIONSHIP OR WHAT!?
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA
> Oh but I did,
You rolled up drunk after a long time in rehab,
and were instantly abusive.. you are NEVER any different!
Why are you so DISHONEST about your behaviour that I
needed to rub your nose in your vomit at the top of this post
..are your memory paths still pissed! B^D
I would happily have continued to ignore you in your childish
posts dedicated to whining about me! B^D
Straight up, you loudly declared that I only 'talk to myself',
which was funny, because you obviously read my posts, and
here you are, one of many posters, in another of my threads!
What a fucking tosser that makes you look like!!!
Clearly you are a jealous little shit and were lying about
my posts being of 'no interest to anyone', especially you! B^)
Now i suppose you will stamp your little paw and demand
I read YOUR twaddle? B^D
What a come-down from your HIGH HORSE! BWAAAHAHAHAAHA!
But on past experience it won't be worth my time..!
It will be JUST ANOTHER ABUSIVE RANT FROM A WHINY BITCH
Here we go.. tell us your troubles and we will give you the
appropriate level of our concern: ;-)
> you and swampy chose to ignore that post,
Aw Diddums! Boo Hoo Hoodey Hoo!
Ah.. so it's YOUR posts which are ignored!!!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
Now it makes sense!
No wonder you were whining and screeching like a jealous
little bitch! B^D
And so here you are, in MY thread.. demanding we all
pay attention to YOU YOU YOU! B^D
Well, listen sport.. you just aren't that interesting!! B^p
Can we go now, or do you have more WHINING?
Oh shit, now you are going to shove something which everyone has
ALREADY IGNORED, under our noses AGAIN, stamp your widdle paw
and demand we "Pay Hampster some attention.. Waaa Waaa Waaa"
> the one where I
> questioned the implication that you could define the character of people
> by the way they vote.
WTF? No recollection of it... sorry! B^p
Were you TALKING TO YOURSELF IN AN EMPTY ROOM AGAIN!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAA!
Perhaps it's your manner.. your deodorant.. your habit
of pissing on the floor and then lecturing people on tact?
B^p
> Perhaps it was in the too hard basket...
Perhaps it was in the 'who gives a fuck about a boring windbag
with an over inflated view of his own significance' basket! B^D
Listen, you don't seem to be too self-aware, so let me help you
out here.. I don't go around commenting on every idiot who posts
shite.. it would be a waste of my time, so have a fucking CRY! B^D
But YOU, wildly oscillate between demanding I pay you some attention,
and pretending I have nothing to say! B^p
Get yourself sorted out, are you a stalker who needs me to pat it's
pointy little head in approval, and if not.. why are you here at all,
it seems to be undermining your bullshit that I am irrelevant and only
talking to myself for you to follow me about demanding my feedback..
and, finally, as you are such a rude shit, with no redeeming humour,
I don't feel inclined to indulge your need for my approval! B^)
Don't stand there bleeding on my rug..
> Says it
> all really don't it che,
That I ignored you and you are a whiny little bitch about it!?
SURE DOES! B^D
> you're not interested in the posts that contain
> rational debate,
Sure I am, with those capable of mounting one..
YOU never tried.. you snuck off and made a bitchy little
puddle in the corner "Che.. waaa waaa.. irrelevant sob sob
ignored.. waa waaa" fucking pathetic, you sad tosser!
I also seem to create many of the NG discussion hot topics
three complete threads on GST followed mine, and the next
day it broke in the media! which might explain why YOU
are trying to crash MY thread.. not the other way around!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!
gotcha!
Oh, that's right you don't have any active threads! B^D
Is there a message there for you?
What we get from you.. FROM THE INSTANT YOU GOT BACK
FROM YOUR BENDER is nothing but this WHINING ABUSIVE SHITE
BELOW. And you then complain that no one gives a shit
and we all ignore you:
> they don't get you all hard and excited, you're only
> interested in altercation.
YOU are chasing ME, lightweight...
.. i don't give a toss other than to expose your
loudmouth hypocrisy in MY THREAD! B^)
I replied to every rational point you made in this thread..
THERE WERE PRECISELY ZERO.
You were already shown up a to be clueless twonk so all i did
was reflect YOUR abuse.. back at you.
Naturally you found it offensive and have been Bitch
whining ever since! Pretty funny really, you are complaining
about your words boomeranged at you! B^D
> And that is also a regular theme with you,
> anything that challenges your babble you run sideways and hide,
I'm here posting.. so that's a lie..
YOU have to explain why you are whining about being
ignored, in my threads, after claiming that I was
the one 'talking to himself'!
Is your absurdity starting to sink in with you yet, or
are you still too hungover and mean to know what day it is!? B^D
> the above is about all you're capable of.
The 'above' was YOUR text, after you had been shown up,
directed BACK at YOU!
Don't like it, THEN DON'T BE A BITCH IN FRONT OF A MIRROR!
If *I* was capable of no more than that, you, and the others,
wouldn't be here disputing with me, or agreeing with me..
or abusing me, or whining for my ATTENTION..
..i would be treated as you are.. ignored!
Q.E.D.
Disinterest in what one professes to find empty
and boring would make sense, that's what I show you,
but not what you beg from me!
I already have a pet.. B^D
Bye Hampster! B^D
> Some of us have no problems at all
> slinging mud at you the same as you sling mud at everyone else,
But unlike you, I don't run around obsessing about someone
I have dismissed as irrelevant!
The meter is ticking.. do we get ANYTHING that looks like
rational debate from you? Any sane comment on the two Australia's
or are you just one more example of the Usenet dross I was talking
about?
> but the
> difference is we CAN hold a civilised debate with sane people without
> degenerating into childish crap,
Oh for fucks sake..you are in MY thread.. it has SERIOUS comments by
other serious posters.. sadly for you, you pathetic tiresome
tosser..YOU WERE NOT ONE OF THEM.. you started with abusive
and irrelevant SHITE and you haven't stopped yet!
I am only persevering so people can see I have given you a chance
to contribute to the topic.. and you have FLUNKED IT!
> as you do. Whereas people like me just
> mirror the attitude we're given,
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!
Go back, read your first post on returning to the NG and
eat your fucking words, you dope addled dipshit!
Heres your opening line.. and it doesn't improve
"Fucking hell, take a little while out and come back and all you see is
a truckload of one post threads with che talking to... well no-one,
no-one reads them, no-one answers them, no-one's interested! "
IF you were NOT LYING when you just claimed "people like me just
mirror the attitude we're given" then you would have IGNORED
all those posts you falsely claimed were IGNORED!
Game Set Match! B^)
You are a special kind of hypocrite.. I suspect the brain damage
really prevents you from seeing things clearly.. and so your
mouth just runs off in a haze of alcoholic machismo.
> you seem to have no alternative but to
> always descend into wanker mode,
Talking to you, perhaps, ..I am trying to 'mirror your attitude'
The reason you are such easy meat is that I back up my claims,
I would have cited evidence right there.. like I did at the top
of this post.
You are just sloppy and opinionated.. like many drunks you
take it as given that you are right.
> as Fran recently discovered when she
> didn't agree with you.
Fran ran away declaring that to mount a case for the rights
of Aussie Olympians using the Universal declaration was something
she doesn't accept.. so she was 'mirroring' the Chinese
government in Tibet.
If she thinks that was incorrect she could have argued her case..
instead she folded and sat on it.
Your chance to comment was in that thread.. it is the mark of the
slimy shitpig that you were too gutless to openly debate, and prefer to
sneak off and whine anywhere but in the relevant thread.
A certain trike toddler likes to do that, completely ignoring
the thread subject and robo-posting old claims already dealt with,
then, when his total RUN-AWAY from the thread topic is ignored
he whines that the thread author is 'running away' from the bee in his
bonnet. B^)
Perhaps you two are related. ;-)
>
> "So much heat, so little light!" - che pegged in one, add it to your
> sigline dude! 8]
I will leave the cliches to you, as you so clearly
lack originality.. I will continue to roll my own, thanks!
---------
"Will this budget help me keep my home,
put groceries in my trolly or keep my job"
- Brenda's Budget Bawling
Well, No, Brenda, it's not the governments job
to put food in your trolly, you useless bludger,
and believe me,
NOTHING CAN SAVE YOUR JOB!
---------
Mission Accomplished
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/11/27/OP_wideweb__470x399,2.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/wmds_r_us/king_john_il
------------
The Official [Est. June 2000] aus.culture.true-blue FAQ ;
http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/faq.html
The true-blue Homestead;
http://geocities.com/fairdinkum_trueblue/
The true-blue Hall Of Fame;
http://www.geocities.com/trueblue_hall_of_fame/index.html
The Tuckerbox;
http://www.geocities.com/true_blue_tucker_box/index.html
-----------
