"fasgnadh" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:470015fe$0$1030$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

No mention of money in that link mate.

"Addinall" addinall.org> wrote in message
news:7IWLi.3877$H22.2297@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

"dechucka" vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47003930$0$3608$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

Addinall wrote:

On 1 Oct, 02:23, Arthur Brain yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Really? Surely, electricity consumers have already paid?
http://www.psiru.org/reports/2004-12-E-NDA.doc
"Electricity consumers have already paid for the decommissioning of
the Magnox plants"

It's worth noting that the UK has a big bill for dealing with very
early nuclear power stations. Technology has moved on a lot in the
last half-century; modern designs can produce more power more safely
for less waste; and be easier to decommission too. We should bear that
in mind when considering that we can't realistically build enough
solar/wind/geothermal capacity to meet our energy needs, and building
fossil-fuel power stations means pumping billions of tonnes of
pollutants into the air.

bobrayner wrote:

"Nuclear power is *now* perfectly safe.

Sure.

Why? This bald assertion is essentially a nuclear-lobby propaganda
invention. ie, a lie.

The danish & spanish are alreday producing about 20%% of their power
via just wind, and they have only gotten serious in thelast few years.

What do you think refining yellowcake does, fruitloop?

Addinall wrote:

oops, I underquoted.. that's 72 Billion POUNDS! 8^o

Sorry mate, that link was to the video, here's the Reuters article;