> According to the Australian of 16 April 2008 [SUPER: #366 / #77 -
> Natural Guide/ Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: #57
> - Guardedness / EGO: #408 / #81 - Making the Essence Clear/
> Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #15 - Reach]
> "Australia's peak christian lobby group has joined the growing debate
> about a charter of rights, saying it could be used to deprive
> religious schools of the right to hire believers.
>
> Australian Christian Lobby managing director Jim Wallace said his
> organisation was concerned that the push for a charter could see
> exemptions in some of the state's equal opportunity laws to be
> overridden."
>
> Mr Wallace said the push for a charter had provoked angst within the
> religious community, which felt it represented a threat to the
> autonomy of all religious organsations, not just Christian ones."
>
> For example Section 77 of the Equal Opportunity Act No 42/1995,
> enables a Church to discriminate against another person "if the
> discrimination is necessary for the first person to comply with the
> person's genuine religious beliefs or principles."
>
> However, as we will see with respect to the American originating
> Seventh-day Adventist--there is with respect to the Sabbath and basis
> for their organizational name, nothing genuine about their religious
> beliefs--and in the instance of hymeneal (marriage) based aspirational
> obscurant fideism, cannot be said to apply where the Church has
> sanctioned by inaction never apologized and provided restitution for
> past child sexual abuse perpetuated by its membership--as is the case
> with the Mormon Church and Jehovah's Witnesses as also being the
> product of American Religious fanaticism.
>
> I raised previously in the consideration of the reasons why Quentin
> Bryce, the next governor-general is wrong on Australians Role in the
> Republic, by saying that it a matter which is up to the people.  That
> the AUTONOMIC RIGHT of the PEOPLE under the COMMONWEALTH is
> established by SECTION 8 of the Letters Patent enabling the Australian
> Constitution of 1901--which is implied by the requirement of an
> obligation placed upon every Australian to be 'obedient, aiding and
> assisting' unto OUR said Governor General.
>
> VIII - And We do hereby require and command all Our Officers and
> Ministers, Civil and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our
> said Commonwealth to be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said
> Governor General, or, in the event of his death, incapacity, or
> absence, to such person or persons as may, from time to time, under
> the provisions of these Our Letters Patent, adminster the Government
> of Our said Commonwealth.
>
> Furthermore, I conveyed that the autonomic right of Australians as the
> basis for becoming a Republic is conveyed by Section 9 of the Letters
> Patent which reserves the right to amend this document which lays
> claim to the possession of Australia as Commonwealth and her
> governance to the Sovereign:
>
> IX - And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our heirs and successors,
> full power and authority from time to time to revoke, alter, or amend
> these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or them shall seem meet.
>
> And that the historical claim to this Sovereignty must be seen in its
> context of being associated to and having origins in the Imperial /
> Religious Roman cult as a history contemporaneous to the autonomic
> transformative prototype as HETEROS symbolic perspective of number--
> that marriage has been understood as emulating this Sovereign function
> such as illustrated by the Biblical references to the Greek notion of
> Zeus and by ipso facto Hera--That it is effected by a transformative
> function enacted by an institutional 3rd party rather than by act of
> nature (ie. copulation) and therefore sub-ordinate to 7th day
> Sabbatarian perspectives of nature as claims to Judaeo-Christian
> Identity: As the Epistle to the Romans says, "To the Jew first and
> also to the Greek".
>
> The date of Wednesday 20 March / 21 March = 1 Nisan is historically
> understood in relation to the Torah's GENESIS CREATION NARRATIVE AND
> BOOKS OF THE LAW and the PROPHETS as being a perspective of the Hebrew
> letters and articulation of the HRUMACHIS cycle {ie. this name is
> implied by HORUS OF THE TWO HORIZONS as HARMAKHIS: "The Son of man is
> Lord even of the Sabbath (which was made for man)." [Matthew 12:8;
> Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5; Luke 13:15]} which commences from the date of the
> Equinox of Wednesday 20 March and constitutes the zero point for the
> following base-7 chronology:
>
> D = 364 x 6 or 2184 days, W = 6D x 7, J = 6D x 49 = 107016 days as 294
> years x 364 or 293 years x 365.2425
>
> There is some considerable conjecture amongst Biblical Scholars as to
> the internal mechanics of the seventy weeks Messianic prophecy given
> by Daniel and whether this cryptic computation is made according to
> the 364 day Temple chronology or to the length of the topical year as
> understood by the Babylonians--all we know from the historical record
> is its probable commencement and termination point: "Seventy weeks are
> determined for your people and for your holy city, to finish the
> transgression, to make an end of sins, to make reconciliation for
> iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up [the]
> vision and prophecy, and to annoint the Most Holy.
>
> 72J2W1D [457 BCE] + 70 weeks as 490 x 364 / 365.2425 years = 31 (1/3)
> CE
>
> 72J2W1D [457 BCE] + 490 x 365.2425 years = 33 CE
>
> Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the
> command to restore and build Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince, there
> shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; the street shall be built
> again, and the wall, even in troublesome times. And after the sixty-
> two weeks [the] Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; and the
> people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the
> sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, and till the end of
> the war desolations are determined." [Daniel 9:24-27]
>
> The fact remains that the new era Christian literature as four Gospels
> and the Apostle Paul's various Epistles were all written before the
> destruction the Jerusalem Temple by the Romans in 69 CE and that they
> were cognizant of this 364 Temple based chronology--And because the
> SABBATH WAS MADE FOR MAN RATHER THAN MAN FOR THE SABBATH--the
> transcendent notion of the 7th day as the basis for Judaeo-Christian
> religious belief--can in no way be antagonistic to the Autonomic Right
> of a 'right of humanity in his own person' as the reasonable desire,
> moral responsibility and duty accorded to democratic regulative free-
> will.  That this Autonomic Right is pre-requisite to any presence,
> participation and procreation as marriage right and duties within the
> Commonwealth of Australia.
>
> The consideration that religious belief, thought and conscience as an
> autonomous {ie. autos / one's true self, the soul + nomos / Torah}
> values expression consistently understood by Seventh-day Adventists as
> Christian community of faith, being established upon the transcendent
> and chronological principle of Nature known as the 7th day Sabbath of
> the Decalogue, are somehow antagonistic to the natural, regulative and
> metempirical principles of good governance as 'certain powers,
> functions, and authorities' declared to be vested within 'the office
> of Governor General and Commander in chief over Our said Commonwealth
> of Australia', may be considered absurd. Historically within
> Australia, there was not opposition to the inclusion of a specific
> religious clause as expression of liberty that was adopted as Section
> 116 of the Australian Constitution of 1901 as the foundational
> document conveying the Principles of Natural and Regulative Philosophy
> articulated by the Letters Patent to said Australian Constitution of
> 1901:
>
> Section 116 of the Australian Constitution says "The Commonwealth
> shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing
> any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any
> religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification
> for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth"
>
> That I have argued the justification of Australia's transition from a
> Constitutional Monarchy to a Republic with a corresponding bill of
> rights entirely on the philosophical basis of the 7th day having a
> cosmological correspondence and the mathematic basis by which the
> GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as AUTONOMIC ENNEAD can be deployed as the
> semantical engine for hosting a religious belief systems.
>
> That as this is empirically validated by geodesic eclipse, there is
> nothing any body has to do beyond coercing the Sovereign to invalidate
> by 'revoking, altering or amending' the Letters Patent, as shall seem
> meet.
>
> This paradigm of mind related to the permanent principle underlying
> temporal things, has in relation to the Logos as Infinity, a logical
> grounding in chronology for which I observe the Sabbath.  But as this
> paradigm also provides the categories of understanding for the
> temporal and non-temporal sphere which are equated with the Hebrew
> language and any other language sustained by milisian ordinals, I
> therefore do not subscribe to any religion which has a creed as a
> human construct created as a semantical world of discourse--because it
> is sub-ordinate to my own transcendent, metempirical and metaphyscial
> philosophical and religious belief.
>
> That the possessional discovery of Australia can be viewed in terms of
> this historical context due to a failure of that Imperial / Religious
> governance as encapsulated in the Gregorian Calendar Reforms of 1582
> which were adopted by the British Empire much later in 1751/1752.
>
> That this possessional discovery and claim of Australia as a continent
> is made as a formula of progression associated with cosmological
> advance related to the Astronomical Unit and a determination of the
> topical year relating to the planet Earth and also Captain Cook's
> usage of a flat board to advance map making...
>
> http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/images/nous.gif
>
> Captain James Cook (1728-1779 CE) ...
>
> read more »