| Re: XR6T launch control in action. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Author: RogerM Date: May 19, 2008 15:55
"Klompmeester" andwhy.com> wrote in message
news:d92dnRJHS5eMxazVnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d@posted.internode...>
> "RogerM" justrucks.net.au> wrote in message
> news:5LCdnXLyQ6jct6zVnZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@internode...>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" ozdebate.remove.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c-OdnS1lhf1YJLPVnZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>> 190km/h isn't quite what I would consider 'cruising'. Even with its
>>>> fairly good aerodynamics, a VE has to push a lot of air out of the way
>>>> at that sort of speed.
>>>
>>> It'd certainly be interesting to find out what it was really doing.
>>>
>>> He told me it got 28 miles per gallon at 190 (why he used miles per
>>> gallon and km/h I don't know but he did), and either he's fucked up his
>>> figures or I have, or that's what it actually got.
>>>
>>> If it did get that kind of mileage I wouldn't really be surprised.
>>
>>
>> If he's a mate of yours, of course you would believe him. That's how
>> fuckers like you operate. I can't even believe for one fucking second you
>> would believe those figures.
>>
>
> What the fuck would you know.
It's called "common sense", you moron, something that has been lacking in
here for fucking ages. Remember the claim was a 6.2 litre V8 using less than
10litres per 100klms at 190 klms/hr? You're just as big a tosser as that
fucker Noddy if you believe that shit.
Maybe, now just maybe if it were the case, we could see Getz's running
around shortly with an 8.5 lt V8 giving minus 5litres per 100 klms at
280klms/hr. That's how stupid the original claim is.
Roger
| 
