> "Klompmeester" andwhy.com> wrote in news:Kf2dnRM-
> q6UoDrLVnZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@posted.internode:
>

>>
>> "Ron" wrote in message
>> news:Xns9AA25254E4E4DGPS@64.209.0.94...

>>> "Klompmeester" andwhy.com> wrote in
>>> news:K8adnYyzA701JbPVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@internode:
>>>

>>>>
>>>> "Ron" wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns9AA1C17A8730AGPS@64.209.0.91...

>>>>> "Noddy" home.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:482e87ea$0$58066$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net:
>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got a mate who lives in Alice Springs who bought a 6.2 litre

> SS

>>>>>> Commy a few months ago, and he tells me it averages just under 10
>>>>>> litres per 100km/s at 190 km/h :)
>>>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure he is full of shit :-)

>>>>
>>>> I'm sure he's pretty close to the mark actually.
>>>>
>>>> The Gen III/IV are excellent on fuel for their capacity and output,
>>>> especially cruising when cruising.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

>>>
>>>

>>
>> 190kmh isn't particularly fast, my slightly modified 2.8L VB Commodore
>> managed it.
>>
>>
>>

>
> Okay I'll re-word it. "Eh?? ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY KILOMETERS AN HOUR????
> To get that FUEL MILEAGE, it would have to have the shape of a D Model
> Citroen with a 100kph tail wind.!!"