aus.cars
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.cars only
 
Advanced search
January 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 1
78910111213 2
14151617181920 3
21222324252627 4
28293031    5
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
aus.cars Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Welcome to my webside that provides help in English Study for Chinese..         


Author: nonamehuang
Date: Jan 14, 2008 05:46

The address is http://englearn.zhan.cn.yahoo.com
And I need your advice. Well, maybe your help. You see. aha!
no comments
  Re: OT Magneto persons only...read please.         


Author: the_dawggie
Date: Jan 14, 2008 02:47

On Jan 14, 8:59 pm, "Noddy" home.com> wrote:
> "the_dawggie" hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c79647c7-1e3a-413d-bdd1-
>
>> We don't understand why anyone would want a petrol/SI engine, really
>> really don't.
>
> Prolly because they don't want noisy, heavy, smelly, gutless, rattly old
> black smoke belching compression ignition engines.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

Mine aint't like that. Take a mitsy Colt and the situation
might be different re oil consumption.

The rattle of the engine really works on my back. Sex on a stick,
love it. It has a lot more power than a lot of petrol shitters too, or
should I say torque?
Show full article (1.74Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: WA Cops in WRX turbo's         


Author: Russell Wood
Date: Jan 14, 2008 02:04

On 2008-01-05, pit gmail.com> wrote:
> Suddenly ! (just noticed) :)
> WA plod appears to be punting WRX s about in police plain colours (not
> the Kandy highway patrol colours)

Correct. I seen one driving in High Wycombe late last year.

--
Russell Wood
<http://www.dynode.net/~rjw/>
no comments
  Re: For Toby :-)         


Author: RainbowWarrior
Date: Jan 14, 2008 01:55

"Toby Ponsenby" privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fmf80l$gsh$2@registered.motzarella.org...
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:23:29 +0000, RainbowWarrior blathered on in :
>
>> Bout time , it's good enough for dogs, it's good enough for criminals,
>> and eventually the rest of the population :) Some wan't be happy of
>> course because they can see the end of the "I wasn't driving excuse"
>
> Which the Law already says is Not An Excuse, dickhead.
>
> Toby

Doesn't stop people trying, remember the "I can prove I was overseas when
someone borrowing my car got a redlight camera photo, so don't have to pay
the fine!"
no comments
  Re: For Toby :-)         


Author: RainbowWarrior
Date: Jan 14, 2008 01:53

"Toby Ponsenby" privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fmf83h$gsh$3@registered.motzarella.org...
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:17:16 +1100, Mot Adv blathered on in :
>
>> "RainbowWarrior" wrote in message
>> news:llCij.2878$421.994@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>> Bout time , it's good enough for dogs, it's good enough for criminals,
>>> and eventually the rest of the population :) Some wan't be happy of
>>> course because they can see the end of the "I wasn't driving excuse"
>>
>> You are the first candidate RainbowWorrier, we want to know your every
>> move, we are the public service, you can truest us and have no choice
>> anyhow.
>
> We'll sell his haunts and coverns as well as his current whereabouts to
> the highest under-the-table bidder.
>
> Toby

Yep like that would be worth anything to anyone lol
no comments
  Re: A new personal best.         


Author: jonz
Date: Jan 14, 2008 01:31

Toby Ponsenby wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:20:24 -0800, Diesel Damo blathered on in :
>
>> On Jan 14, 12:42Â pm, arfa mo wrote:
>>
>>> Â Â Â no, not at all you old knuckle dragger you....but bullshit and
>>> Â Â Â a
>>> bad memory could be a nasty combo. here for your edification, is a
>>> little snippet from last year.....be sure to read the whole thread...
>>> love the bit about the cops following you at....wait for it !!!!
>>> 130-150kph, so they can have a little chinwag with ya.....throw that
>>> crack pipe away, yer getting sillier........
>>>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â http://tinyurl.com/2c3yd4
>> Okay, one last response to you and then your dumb arse is in the
>> killfile for good. You'll need logical thought to follow here, so it's
>> probably going to be painful for you.
>>
>> The 130-150 was - as was clearly stated in the post - because of what
>> little fuel I had in the tank was leaking out and I had to get it home ...
Show full article (2.71Kb)
no comments
  Re: Dealer RWCs - Worth the paper they're written on?         


Author: Kwyjibo
Date: Jan 14, 2008 00:04

"Toby Ponsenby" privacy.net> wrote in message
news:fmd586$e3j$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:13:14 +1100, Kwyjibo blathered on in :
>
>> "Toby Ponsenby" privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:fmcv25$f54$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:33:03 +1100, Kwyjibo blathered on in :
>>>
>>>> In the process of buying an 18 month old car through a dealer. The
>>>> dealer (who is also a new car trader) is doing the RWC test in their
>>>> own workshop.
>>>>
>>>> What the general consensus on this? Are these roadworthy certificates
>>>> usually any good, or do they rush through the test, fix the obvious
>>>> stuff and hope that no-one notices the rest?
>>>>
>>>> Also - I noticed a small tear on the plastic over the steering wheel
>>>> boss, where it covers the airbag. It's only fairly small (about 10mm)
>>>> but is starting to peel back along its edge. Is this unroadworthy?
>>> ...
Show full article (1.59Kb)
1 Comment