The NIMBY Syndrome Continues - Essendon Airport
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
The NIMBY Syndrome Continues - Essendon Airport         


Author: Snapper
Date: Aug 31, 2008 19:25

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24272250-2862,00.html

I wonder how many of these people have been here since before the airport
commenced operations? And how many moved there knowing that an airport is
nearby. In particular how many people moved there since 1978 when that fatal
crash occured?

And how many of these "protestors" have a vested interest in seeing the airport
closed and the land opened up to redevelopment?

If they close the airport will they accept a doubling of capital improved value
based rates?

Say they move the airport, or rather build a new one out near Calder or
somewhere like that, how long before the ever expanding suburbia encroaches on
it and it (and perhaps Calder Raceway) are forced to close?

Look at the likes of JFK, LAX and LGA, three airports smack in the middle of
suburbia that see more operations in a month than what MEL or Essendon would see
in a year. Yet they don't seem to be under threat of closure for "safety
reasons".

What do the pilots here who may use Essendon or even Moorabin, think of this?

--
The most effective way to remember your wife's birthday is to forget it once.
1 Comment
Re: The NIMBY Syndrome Continues - Essendon Airport         


Author: Graeme Hogan
Date: Sep 7, 2008 23:40

"Snapper" y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:ackmb498sc5b2l0jk2efpqmbvim7tch10o@yarwho.com...
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24272250-2862,00.html
>
> I wonder how many of these people have been here since before the airport
> commenced operations? And how many moved there knowing that an airport is
> nearby. In particular how many people moved there since 1978 when that
> fatal
> crash occured?
>
All of them
> And how many of these "protestors" have a vested interest in seeing the
airport
> closed and the land opened up to redevelopment?
>
All of them
Show full article (1.44Kb)
no comments