*> > up with viable explanations for at least a few of these.
*>
*> > Miracle 1: Where does the new matter come from?*
*>
*> > Miracle 2: How does it happen that the new matter has the right
chemical
*> > and isotopic compositions in the right quantities to be
undetectable?
*> > Changes over time in heavier elements might simply be buried
deep
inside
*> > the earth, but the model also creates water and other volatiles
on the
*> > surface in the right quantities and isotopic balances to leave
no
trace
*> > in the geological record.
*>
*> > Miracle 3: How does it happen that the new matter has not
affected
*> > earth's orbit or rotation period? The added material has
increased
*> > earth's moment of inertia, so keeping it rotating at a constant
speed
*> > (after allowing for tidal drag) is inexplicable.
*>
*> > Miracle 4: How does it happen that the earth's paleomagnetism is
*> > everywhere consistent with a constant-sized earth? A smaller
earth in
*> > the past would make paleomagnetism directions very much
different, if
*> > the earth's magnetic field was roughly the same. By what
incredible
*> > conincidence did the magnetic field adjust to produce data just
like one
*>* > would find on a constant-sized earth?
*>
*> > Miracle 5: Why is expansion not occurring on other planets?
Bodies
*> > without atmospheres, notably the Moon and Mercury, don't have
erosion to
*> > obscure stretch marks, and the Moon and Mercury show no signs of
*> > deformation for well over a billion years. Nor is the sun, or
the*
*> > earth's orbit would be affected.
*>
*> > Miracle 6: Why is expansion not seen occurring on Earth? Modern
*> > instruments are plenty accurate to detect changes in both size
and mass,
*> > yet they detect neither.
*>
*> > Miracle 7: Why could overthrusting (subduction) not operate in
the past?
*> > We can see that subduction is happening at a fairly constant
rate
today.
*> > And the expanding earth model includes subduction (they call it
*> > overthrusting), but says that it eats up only tens, or at most
hundreds,
*> > of miles of oceanic crust. The limit makes sense only if
overthrusting
*> > started less than about ten million years ago. Why not earlier?
*>
*> > Miracle 8: Why is an expanding earth not detectable by
paleontologists,
*> > neither as changes in morphology from an increasing gravity, nor
as
*> > patterns of biogeography? Even if expanding earth proponents
are
not
*> > looking at this issue, other paleontologists are, and they
should
have
*> > noticed and pointed out patterns which do not match
expectations.
*>
*> > Miracle 9: Why are competent geologists not expounding on the
expanding
*> > earth, especially since it was such a hot topic 35 years ago?
The data
*> > to conclusively support or refute the expanding earth has been
around
*> > for a couple decades or more, and most scientists love underdog
ideas
*> > when the evidence supports them. Why do no geologists want the
laurels
*> > of making the definitive case for an expanding earth?
*>
*> > Miracle 10: What do a small handful of amatuers know that the
competent
*> > geologists don't? Their knowledge of geology is only slightly
greater
*> > than that of the average layman, and their knowledge in other
areas,
*> > such as in physics and in the scientific method, may well be
less
than
*> > average. Yet, they say, they know more about the foundation of
the
*> > field of geology than do people who have devoted lifetimes to
studying
*> > it.
*>
*> > --
*> > Mark Isaak
*>
*> Ask your own questions, Dickhead, ..preferably over in
talk.origins.
*> They love talking about Earth Expansion over there. Especially
*> Isaak. It's been off-topic here since the get-go.- Masquer le
texte des messages précédents -
*>
He can't ...since George has only known questions - known answers
sets
in his brain program.
Obviously EE and PE & questions relative to such are off limit to his
mind routines & hence non existent... and so to the Academic
Amateurs
& other University Fools masquerading as Geologists, and which see
Continents drifting in all directions without in all cases Points of
Origin nor Point of Applications for the Imaginary Force Vectors. The
Imbeciles even are imagining the very seams of that planet i.e. the
Mid Ocean Ridges with their dark smokers, drifting as well.
Such Clowns as George are in fact a clear indication of Mankind De-
Evolution back to the Tree Descending Monkey ....
Last but not least, as our friend Oriel 36 knows well, the
Equatorial
Bulge is resulting from Earth magmatic Dynamic ... but the
Equatorial
Bulge on its own is the demonstration that NO CONTINENTAL DRIFT EVEN
TOOK PLACE !
Why ?
Simpy because :
1) We are on a Sphere and there is no straight line on a Sphere
( mathematically demonstrated by well known German Mathematician )
hence structurally hard Continent cannot bend around on their assumed
trips ... it would show indeed through lines of stress i.e. zones of
compression & and expansion IN symetry. NONE at all in that pattern.
2) For the same reasons those alleged drift of Continents cannot
slide
like slugs over the Equatorial Bulge, or say Convex / Anticline
relief
anymore that they can slide down Concave / Syncline relief without
permanent deformations. NONE at all again in that pattern.
That small demonstration from the True Geology is the death blow to a
moribund theory spouted forth by Sectarian Sci000ntific Slobs (SSS
such as George) and to an equally moribund Congregations of Sterile
Imbeciles parasiting such Universities as far apart as Curtin, the
ANU, Caltech & Oxford
By the way there is NO MASS INCREASE IN PE or EE ACCORDING TO THE
TRUE
GEOLOGY... the balance of mass being always negative in fact as
function of time.
With best regards to you, Sir Don
(not to be forwarded to Talk Origins' Retards ...loss of time
indeed )
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~
True Geology Foudation document :
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327
