Save fuel remove in flight entertainment
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Author: Pits
Date: Jul 9, 2008 21:57

US Airways pulls the plug on movies

NEW YORK - In another blow to passengers, US Airways says it will
start removing in-flight entertainment systems on domestic flights in
November to save about US$10 million annually in fuel and other costs.

Spokesman Phil Gee says the movie systems weigh about 500lbs each,
forcing planes to use more fuel to get around the country.

Gee says US Airways will cut the movie systems from about 200
aircraft. But it will keep movies in its widebody aircraft for
international flights and trips to Hawaii.

***
It makes sense
perhaps up the Eastern seaboard tracks ?
5 Comments
Re: Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Date: Jul 10, 2008 06:17

Pits wrote:
> US Airways pulls the plug on movies
>
> NEW YORK - In another blow to passengers, US Airways says it will
> start removing in-flight entertainment systems on domestic flights in
> November to save about US$10 million annually in fuel and other costs.
>
> Spokesman Phil Gee says the movie systems weigh about 500lbs each,
> forcing planes to use more fuel to get around the country.
>
> Gee says US Airways will cut the movie systems from about 200
> aircraft. But it will keep movies in its widebody aircraft for
> international flights and trips to Hawaii.
>
> ***
> It makes sense
> perhaps up the Eastern seaboard tracks ?
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
Re: Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Date: Jul 10, 2008 18:03

>Most of the safety instruction are played over the systems, plus other
>PR stuff.

Revert to the "good old days". Use the cabin PA system ( if thats the
term), and the cabin crew can mime the actions along with a cassete or
Audio CD commentary as they now do anyway. Worked in the past so
should fill the bill for those who actually take any notice of the
safety briefings.

Guess I'm biased! I would rather read than watch anyway.

Bob.
no comments
Re: Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Author: Rob
Date: Jul 10, 2008 22:37

GB wrote:
> "Rob." mine.com.> wrote in
> news:48760be4_4@news.peopletelecom.com.au:
>> You should feel the weight of the Personal Video units supplied to
>> passengers on Jetstar. Must be about 2/3 battery pack and weigh around
>> 4kgs each. Could add up to some serious weight saving leaving them at
>> home.
>> Most of the safety instruction are played over the systems, plus other
>> PR stuff.
>
> Does everyone get one, or is it first in, best dressed?
>

All star class are entitled to one. Then you can pre order or hope for
one on the aircraft. As their aircraft carry a bit over 300 pax they
would carry possibly well over 200 units.
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
Re: Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Author: Snapper
Date: Jul 14, 2008 02:46

Rob. wrote...
> You should feel the weight of the Personal Video units supplied to
> passengers on Jetstar. Must be about 2/3 battery pack and weigh around
> 4kgs each. Could add up to some serious weight saving leaving them at home.

How many pax, say 200? If so that's around a tonne in weight savings. What would
that be percentage-wise, and would the aircraft actually notice it (fuel usage,
etc.)?

I s'pose though, a tonne of extraneous stuff swapped for a tonne of payload
makes sense.

--
First things first, but neccesarily in that order
no comments
Re: Save fuel remove in flight entertainment         


Author: Rob
Date: Jul 14, 2008 05:09

Snapper wrote:
> Rob. wrote...
>
>> You should feel the weight of the Personal Video units supplied to
>> passengers on Jetstar. Must be about 2/3 battery pack and weigh around
>> 4kgs each. Could add up to some serious weight saving leaving them at home.
>
> How many pax, say 200? If so that's around a tonne in weight savings. What would
> that be percentage-wise, and would the aircraft actually notice it (fuel usage,
> etc.)?
>
> I s'pose though, a tonne of extraneous stuff swapped for a tonne of payload
> makes sense.
>

They are talking of the A380 being 7 tonne over weight and are hoping to
reduce that figure (typical volumetric payload 66.4 tonne. So 1 tonne on
a smaller a320 aircraft would be significant as well considering that
the typical volumetric payload is 16.6 tonne.
no comments