>Some on this newsgroup with an intimate relationship with their GP and
>scant respect for reporters will appreciate this one... reported in
>last Thursday's Australian.

>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4293

>Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
>index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
>with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
>accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
>recall.

>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4385

>Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....

>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4313

>Coop

> Some on this newsgroup with an intimate relationship with their GP and
> scant respect for reporters will appreciate this one... reported in
> last Thursday's Australian.
>
> Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
> index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
> with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
> accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
> recall.
>
> Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....
>
>
> Coop

>Some on this newsgroup with an intimate relationship with their GP and
>scant respect for reporters will appreciate this one... reported in
>last Thursday's Australian.
>
>Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
>index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
>with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
>accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
>recall.
>
>Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....
>
>
>Coop

> Some on this newsgroup with an intimate relationship with their GP and
> scant respect for reporters will appreciate this one... reported in
> last Thursday's Australian.
>
> Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
> index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
> with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
> accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
> recall.
>
> Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....
>
>
> Coop

>
> Coop chariotnose.netwheel.au> writes:
>

>>Some on this newsgroup with an intimate relationship with their GP and
>>scant respect for reporters will appreciate this one... reported in
>>last Thursday's Australian.

>

>>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4293

>

>>Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
>>index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
>>with other than his preferred finger.

> Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
> index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
> with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
> accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
> recall.
>
> Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....

>Coop wrote...
>

>> Several papers reported a recall of patients whose GP had injured his
>> index finger and had been forced to carry out prostate examinations
>> with other than his preferred finger. This turned out to be less
>> accurate, and the examinations would have to be repeated- hence the
>> recall.
>>
>> Turns out the original news release was a complete fabrication.....

>
>I would have thought that something like that would've been published on or
>around the 1st April...