|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: YaguYagu Date: May 25, 2008 17:57
|
| |
|
| | 72 Comments |
|
|
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: May 25, 2008 18:16
Yagu wrote:
In these situations, the passengers should demand to be let off, and if
necessary, call the police to say they're being unlawfully detained.
If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
Sylvia.
|
| |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: YaguYagu Date: May 25, 2008 18:47
> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
> opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>
> Sylvia.
Have not heard anything as stupid as this in my life!
Yagu
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: May 25, 2008 18:53
Yagu wrote:
>> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
>> opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Have not heard anything as stupid as this in my life!
>
> Yagu
>
>
Why? There's nothing particularly dangerous about going down an escape
slide, especially when there's no urgency. The airline would be
seriously annoyed of course, but only because of the cost and
disruption. Next time they'd learn to be more proactive about dealing
with these situations. People cannot lawfully be detained merely because
it's convenient.
|
| Show full article (0.74Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: May 25, 2008 19:18
Sylvia Else wrote:
> Yagu wrote:
>
> In these situations, the passengers should demand to be let off, and if
> necessary, call the police to say they're being unlawfully detained.
>
> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
> opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>
> Sylvia.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Atheist ChaplainAtheist Chaplain Date: May 25, 2008 20:04
> Yagu wrote:
>>> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
>>> opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> Have not heard anything as stupid as this in my life!
>>
>> Yagu
>
> Why? There's nothing particularly dangerous about going down an escape
> slide, especially when there's no urgency. The airline would be seriously
> annoyed of course, but only because of the cost and disruption. Next time
> they'd learn to be more proactive about dealing with these situations.
> People cannot lawfully be detained merely because it's convenient.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: May 25, 2008 21:04
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>> Yagu wrote:
>>>> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and then
>>>> opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>> Have not heard anything as stupid as this in my life!
>>>
>>> Yagu
>> Why? There's nothing particularly dangerous about going down an escape
>> slide, especially when there's no urgency. The airline would be seriously
>> annoyed of course, but only because of the cost and disruption. Next time
>> they'd learn to be more proactive about dealing with these situations.
>> People cannot lawfully be detained merely because it's convenient.
>>
>> Sylvia. ...
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Atheist ChaplainAtheist Chaplain Date: May 25, 2008 21:53
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>>> Yagu wrote:
>>>>> If you know how, arming the door (don't ask for a cross-check) and
>>>>> then opening it will provide a way of getting down to the ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>> Have not heard anything as stupid as this in my life!
>>>>
>>>> Yagu
>>> Why? There's nothing particularly dangerous about going down an escape
>>> slide, especially when there's no urgency. The airline would be
>>> seriously annoyed of course, but only because of the cost and
>>> disruption. Next time they'd learn to be more proactive about dealing
>>> with these situations. People cannot lawfully be detained merely because ...
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: May 25, 2008 23:34
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
> a call that is even more easily trumped by citing passenger safety, and
> keeping them out of a potentially harmful area. and Safety trumps all
>
Really? Where in any law does it say that you can constrain someone's
freedom to keep them safe?
Sylvia.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: YaguYagu Date: May 26, 2008 00:17
with apologies to the group, you are the weakest link.
"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:483a59f0$0$13947$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
>>
>> a call that is even more easily trumped by citing passenger safety, and
>> keeping them out of a potentially harmful area. and Safety trumps all
>>
>
> Really? Where in any law does it say that you can constrain someone's
> freedom to keep them safe?
>
> Sylvia.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
