Interesting to note the silence of the NG on this subject!

Paul

"Paul Blair" pcug.org.au> wrote in message
news:46cfb9e5$0$10708$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

Meaning?

Paul Blair wrote:

I heard it on the news but there hasn't been anymore since.

So fill us all in with more details.

r

Rob wrote:

He wasn't qualified to do the work he was doing, but it wasn't
incompetence that lead to his exposure. One has to hope that means he
was competent, despite not having a tick in the relevant box, because
otherwise it means that Qantas cannot detect incompetence in its staff.

Sylvia.

"Mil80C" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46cfbe10@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

You're kidding ..right

Sylvia Else wrote:

Is this the news report?

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22281202-5006301,00.html

Graham

"Paul Blair" pcug.org.au> wrote in message
news:46cfb9e5$0$10708$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

TacAN wrote:

Has there been any progress?

From a 4th Year apprentice to nothing???? didn't he finish or what?

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:59:39 +1000, Rob mine.com> wrote:

dont you just love these throw away lines.

the reality is that under CASA's gaze anyone working on aircraft is an
AME and is described by that part of the regs.

It would be easy for the clueless to think that AME's in qantas
employment would be posing as LAME's if they worked on aircraft and
signed signoffs for work done by them. that's what makes them
clueless.

I think I'll still fly Qantas.

Stealth Pilot

"Sylvia Else" wrote in message
news:46cfc423$0$15276$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...