OT: Camera
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
OT: Camera         


Author: Brian
Date: Oct 8, 2007 09:01

I know this is off-topic but I would prefer to post here rather than in,
say, aus.photo since the purpose of my purchase is because I'm getting
plenty of opportunity for air-to-air photos lately in some pretty unique
aircraft. I know GB and Glenn are just a couple of many digi photo fans so
hoping they and the rest of the group can offer some advice to a newbie.

I'm in the market for a camera that I'll grow into as I get more
proficient. I was looking at the Canon 40D which I don't really know much
about other than what I've read online - but from what I have read and a
very brief intro at Bing Lee from a guy that didn't know much at all it
seems like a great little camera. All advice is much appreciated.

Thanks. Brian.

--
Posted at www.Usenet.com.au
12 Comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: YaguMac
Date: Oct 10, 2007 16:47

On Oct 9, 1:01 am, nos...@usenet.fake (Brian) wrote:
> I know this is off-topic but I would prefer to post here rather than in,
> say, aus.photo since the purpose of my purchase is because I'm getting
> plenty of opportunity for air-to-air photos lately in some pretty unique
> aircraft. I know GB and Glenn are just a couple of many digi photo fans so
> hoping they and the rest of the group can offer some advice to a newbie.
>
> I'm in the market for a camera that I'll grow into as I get more
> proficient. I was looking at the Canon 40D which I don't really know much
> about other than what I've read online - but from what I have read and a
> very brief intro at Bing Lee from a guy that didn't know much at all it
> seems like a great little camera. All advice is much appreciated.
>
> Thanks...
Show full article (1.11Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: Rob
Date: Oct 10, 2007 20:32

YaguMac wrote:
> On Oct 9, 1:01 am, nos...@usenet.fake (Brian) wrote:
>
>>I know this is off-topic but I would prefer to post here rather than in,
>>say, aus.photo since the purpose of my purchase is because I'm getting
>>plenty of opportunity for air-to-air photos lately in some pretty unique
>>aircraft. I know GB and Glenn are just a couple of many digi photo fans so
>>hoping they and the rest of the group can offer some advice to a newbie.
>>
>>I'm in the market for a camera that I'll grow into as I get more
>>proficient. I was looking at the Canon 40D which I don't really know much
>>about other than what I've read online - but from what I have read and a
>>very brief intro at Bing Lee from a guy that didn't know much at all it
>>seems like a great little camera. All advice is much appreciated.
>>
>>Thanks. Brian.
>>
>>--
>>Posted atwww.Usenet.com.au
> ...
Show full article (2.02Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: ned
Date: Oct 11, 2007 05:53

YaguMac wrote:
> On Oct 9, 1:01 am, nos...@usenet.fake (Brian) wrote:
>> I know this is off-topic but I would prefer to post here rather than in,
>> say, aus.photo since the purpose of my purchase is because I'm getting
>> plenty of opportunity for air-to-air photos lately in some pretty unique
>> aircraft. I know GB and Glenn are just a couple of many digi photo fans so
>> hoping they and the rest of the group can offer some advice to a newbie.
>>
>> I'm in the market for a camera that I'll grow into as I get more
>> proficient. I was looking at the Canon 40D which I don't really know much
>> about other than what I've read online - but from what I have read and a
>> very brief intro at Bing Lee from a guy that didn't know much at all it
>> seems like a great little camera. All advice is much appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks. Brian.
>>
>> --
>> Posted atwww.Usenet.com.au
>
> Personally, IMHO, the latest Nikon D200 is excellent, body only around ...
Show full article (1.44Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: ned
Date: Oct 11, 2007 07:44

Rob wrote:
> YaguMac wrote:
>> On Oct 9, 1:01 am, nos...@usenet.fake (Brian) wrote:
>>
>>> I know this is off-topic but I would prefer to post
here rather than in,
>>> say, aus.photo since the purpose of my purchase is
because I'm getting
>>> plenty of opportunity for air-to-air photos lately in
some pretty unique
>>> aircraft. I know GB and Glenn are just a couple of many
digi photo fans so
>>> hoping they and the rest of the group can offer some
advice to a newbie.
>>>
>>> I'm in the market for a camera that I'll grow into as I
get more
>>> proficient. I was looking at the Canon 40D which I
don't really know much
>>> about other than what I've read online - but from what ...
Show full article (2.99Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: Ed
Date: Oct 15, 2007 19:20

Rob wrote:
> ned wrote:
>
>> Yeah - I read it and remain unimpressed. What are you going to do with
>> all those extra megapixels
>> that camera salesman love to trot out? Print roadside billboards?
>>
>
> The cmos sensor
>
Huh? The CMOS sensor what?
>
>> And still no image stabilization! Unbelievable when even sub $200
>> cameras provide it.
>>
>>
>> Spend the money saved on the body on a nice piece of glass - this one
>> covers most situations and eliminates annoying lens changes in dusty
>> conditions -
> ...
Show full article (0.69Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: Rob
Date: Oct 15, 2007 20:48

Ed wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>
>> ned wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah - I read it and remain unimpressed. What are you going to do
>>> with all those extra megapixels
>>> that camera salesman love to trot out? Print roadside billboards?
>>>
>>
>> The cmos sensor
>>
> Huh? The CMOS sensor what?
>
You had better look up the specs od the D200 and the D300 to which it
refers.
Show full article (0.84Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: Brian
Date: Oct 15, 2007 22:56

GB wrote:
>
> OK, so that's a quick brain dump of what I know (the bits
> I remember anyway). I hope this lot helps. Please ask questions
> if there's more you need.
>
>
> GB

Thanks very much GB. I'm very much a beginner but want a camera that i'll
grow into without overtaking in terms of features or functions and i don't
think i'll be doing that with the Canon in too much of a hurry. Your kind
advice cements my decision, so thank you.

--
Posted at www.Usenet.com.au
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: The Old Bloke
Date: Oct 16, 2007 00:18

"Rob" mine.com> wrote in message
news:471434a3_1@news.peopletelecom.com.au...
> Ed wrote:
>> Rob wrote:
>>
>>> ned wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah - I read it and remain unimpressed. What are you going to do with
>>>> all those extra megapixels
>>>> that camera salesman love to trot out? Print roadside billboards?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The cmos sensor
>>>
>> Huh? The CMOS sensor what?
>>
> You had better look up the specs od the D200 and the D300 to which it
> refers.
>
>>> ...
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: OT: Camera         


Author: Rob
Date: Oct 16, 2007 01:11

The Old Bloke wrote:
> "
> I'm no expert, but I think the Sony Alpha700 has electronic image
> stabilisation
>
> "Like Sony's mainstream DSLR-A100 model, the new A700 unit incorporates
> Super SteadyShot® Inside image stabilization in the camera body and is
> compatible with most Minolta Maxxum® mount lenses in addition to Sony
> lenses." See http://www.dpreview.com/news/0709/07090601sonydslra700.asp
>
> Regards
> Doug

Yep found that, fair enough, was not aware - sony must have used a
compact sensor and shoved it into a slr.

Lens choice is not great - "• Sony Alpha lenses
(also compatible with Minolta A-type bayonet mount lenses)"

Would not go out looking for a long lens.
Show full article (0.87Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Olympus 3.34 Megapixel Digital Camera - excellent camera!tamu.forsale ·
1 2